Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-4rdpn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T06:40:29.943Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

“Not more than Seven Clear Days”

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 February 2018

Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Occasional Notes of the Quarter
Information
Journal of Mental Science , Volume 33 , Issue 144 , January 1888 , pp. 547 - 550
Copyright
Copyright © Royal College of Psychiatrists, 1888 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

* To avoid burdening the main argument with a minor point, we relegate to a note the fact that Mr. Fry thinks the word “clear” is scarcely necessary here, the days so referred to being natural or ordinary days. The word is wanted in a negative or exclusive proposition, but not in an affirmative or inclusive one.Google Scholar

† Vide “Dowling's Reports on Points of Practice,” Vol. i., N.S., p. 767.Google Scholar

‡ In connection with this question, “Rex v. Justices of Herefordshire,” 3 B. and Aid. 581, should also be referred to. We have already noted “Reg. v Justices of Shropshire,” 8 Ad. and El. 173.Google Scholar

Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.