Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T04:28:59.532Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The nature and measurement of schizophrenic thought disorder

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 February 2018

D. Bannister
D. Bannister*
Affiliation:
Medical Research Council Direct Grant Holder, Bexley Hospital, Dartford Heath, Bexley, Kent
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The work to be reported is a replication and refinement of a previous study (Bannister, 1960). As preface to the previous study, four traditional approaches to the problem of schizophrenic thought disorder were briefly reviewed, namely “dissociation” (Kretschmer 1936), “deterioration in mental efficiency” (Babcock, 1933), “concretism” (Kasanin 1946) and “overinclusion” (Payne, Matussek and George, 1959). These explanations and the experimental work arising from them were not utilized in the current research since it is argued that they suffer from three major defects.

Type
Psychological
Information
Journal of Mental Science , Volume 108 , Issue 457 , November 1962 , pp. 825 - 842
Copyright
Copyright © Royal College of Psychiatrists, 1962 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Babcock, H. (1933). Dementia Praecox. A Psychological Study. New York.Google Scholar
Bannister, D. (1959). “An Application of Personal Construct Theory (Kelly) to Schizoid Thinking”. Unpublished Ph.D. Thesis, University of London Library.Google Scholar
Idem (1960). “Conceptual structure in Thought-Disordered Schizophrenics”, J. Ment. Sc. 106, 1230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bruner, J. S. (1956). “A Cognitive Theory of Personality”, Contemporary Psycholhgy, 1, No. 12.Google Scholar
Fiske, D. W., and Maddi, S. (Eds.) (1961). Functions of Varied Experience. (Contribution by Bieri, J.). Homewood, Ill.: Dorsey Press.Google Scholar
Franks, C. (1954). Unpublished Ph.D. Thesis, University of London Library.Google Scholar
Kasanin, J. S. (Ed.) (1946). Language and Thought in Schizophrenia. Berkeley, Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Kelly, G. A. (1955). The Psychology of Personal Constructs, Vols. 1 and 2. New York, Norton.Google Scholar
Idem. (1960). “Personal Construct Theory as a line of inference”, Harvard University Lecture, published by Ohio State University.Google Scholar
Idem. (1961). Paper in The Cry for Help, Farberow, N. L., Shneidman, E. S. (Eds.). New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Kretschmer, E. (1936). Physique and Character. London.Google Scholar
Langfield, A. W. (1955). “Self-predictive orientation and the movement interpretation of threat”, J. Abn. soc. Psychol., 51, No. 3.Google Scholar
Mayer-Gross, W., Slater, E., and Roth, M. (1954). Clinical Psychiatry. London: Cassell ' Co., Ltd. Google Scholar
Payne, R. W., Mattussek, P., and George, E. I. (1959), J. Ment. Sci., 104, 437.Google Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.