Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T17:13:46.196Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Misidentification and Non-Recognition

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 February 2018

Stanley M. Coleman
Stanley M. Coleman*
Affiliation:
Dorset County Mental Hospital, Dorchester
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In 1923, under the title, “The Illusion of Doubles in a Case of Systematized Delusional Insanity” (1), J. Capgras and J. Reboul-Lachaux described for the first time an interesting syndrome of non-recognition. The case was that of a persecuted and megalomanic woman in whom there existed a condition of agnostic identification without disturbance of sensory or memory images. The patient postulated a series of “doubles” replacing the various persons of her environment, even her husband and daughter being included. During the course of a few months she complained that she had been shown one thousand doubles of her daughter. The person confronted was appreciated to resemble exactly the known individual, but on account of some subjective disorder, the ability to identify her was lost and the belief in “doubles” brought forward in order to explain this state of non-recognition.

Type
Part I.—Original Articles
Information
Journal of Mental Science , Volume 79 , Issue 324 , January 1933 , pp. 42 - 51
Copyright
Copyright © Royal College of Psychiatrists, 1933 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

(1) Capgras et Reboul-Lachaux, “Illusion des sosies dans un délire systématisé chronique,” Bull. Soc. Clin, de Méd. Ment., January, 1923.Google Scholar
(2) Halberstadt, , “Syndrome d”illusion des sosies,” Journ. de Psychol., October, 1923.Google Scholar
(3) Capgras et Carrettc, “Illusion des sosies et complexe d”dipe,” Ann. Méd.-psych., June, 1924.Google Scholar
(4) Larrive, et Jasienski, , “L”illusion des sosies,” ibid., December, 1931.Google Scholar
(5) Courbon, et Tusques, , “Identification délirante et fausse reconnaissance, ibid., June, 1932.Google Scholar
(6) Vié, , “Un trouble de l'identification des personnes,” ibid., March, 1930.Google Scholar
(7) Courbon et Fail, “Illusion de Frégoli,” Soc. Clin, de Méd. Ment., July, 1927.Google Scholar
(8) Courbon et Turques, “Illusion d'intermétamorphose,” Soc. Méd-psych., April, 1932.Google Scholar
(9) Devine, H., Recent Advances in Psychiatry.Google Scholar
(10) Freud, Sigm., “Female Sexuality,” Internat. Journ. Psycho-Analysis, July, 1932.Google Scholar
(11) Reich, Wilhelm, “The Characterological Mastery of the Odipus Complex,” ibid., October, 1931.Google Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.