No CrossRef data available.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 19 February 2018
1 N.B.—The figures for May as given above differ somewhat from those given in the Report of Council, as the results of the examination of South African can didates were not known at the time the Report was written. These have since come to hand, and the above figures are correct, as supplied by the Registrar.—ED. Google Scholar
1 See foot-note to Report of Council, p. 504. Google Scholar
eLetters
No eLetters have been published for this article.