Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T07:20:18.479Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Measurement of Motivation through the use of Objective Indices

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 February 2018

H. J. Eysenck  and
R. A. Willett
H. J. Eysenck
Affiliation:
Institute of Psychiatry (Maudsley Hospital), University of London
R. A. Willett
Affiliation:
Institute of Psychiatry (Maudsley Hospital), University of London
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

While abilities and attitudes are frequently subjected to measurement, motivation has largely escaped the attention of experimental psychologists and psycho-metrists. Attempts to use subjective and interpretive techniques have not met with any notable success, and it would seem that this whole area represents one of the most neglected fields of psychology, in spite of its obvious major importance both from the fundamental and from the applied points of view. We would argue that the objective measurement of motivation or drive in human beings is an essential requirement for clinical psychology, and we would further suggest that such objective measurement can only be accomplished in terms of some theoretical system in which drive has a recognized place and mode of interaction with measurable variables. It has been suggested by Eysenck and Maxwell (1961) that only the Hullian system provides such an account, and some evidence is to hand (Kimble, 1950; Wasserman, 1951; Claridge, 1960; Eysenck and Maxwell, 1961) to reinforce the view that deductions can be made from this system which will generate testable hypotheses relating to the measurement of motivation.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Journal of Mental Science , Volume 107 , Issue 450 , September 1961 , pp. 961 - 968
Copyright
Copyright © Royal College of Psychiatrists, 1961 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Claridge, G., “The excitation-inhibition balance in neurotics”, in: Eysenck, H. J. (Ed.), Experiments in Personality, 1960. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Claridge, G. S., “Arousal and inhibition as determinants of the performance of neurotics”, Brit. J. Psychol., 1961. To appear.Google Scholar
Idem and Herrington, R. N., “Sedation threshold, personality, and the theory of neurosis”, J. Ment. Sci., 1960, 106, 1568—1583.Google Scholar
Eysenck, H. J., Dynamics of Anxiety and Hysteria, 1957. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Idem , Experiments in Personality (2 vols.), 1960a. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul Google Scholar
Idem , The Structure of Human Personality, 1960b. 2nd edition. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
Idem and Maxwell, A. E., “Reminiscence as a function of drive”, Brit. J. Psychol., 1961. To appear.Google Scholar
Kimble, G. A., “Evidence for the role of motivation in determining the amount of reminiscence in pursuit rotor learning”, J. exp. Psychol., 1950, 40, 248—253.Google Scholar
Venables, P. H., “Factors in the motor behaviour of functional psychotics”, J. abnorm. soc. Psychol., 1959, 58, 153—156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wasserman, H. N., “The effect of motivation and amount of pre-rest practice upon inhibitory potential in motor learning”, J. exp. Psychol, 1951, 42, 162—172.Google Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.