Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-03T00:45:45.914Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Learning Theory and Behaviour Therapy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 February 2018

H. J. Eysenck
H. J. Eysenck*
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Institute of Psychiatry, University of London
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

It would probably be true to say that the present position in the psychiatric treatment of neurotic disorders is characterized by the following features. (1) With the exception of electroshock, the only method of treatment at all widely used is psychotherapy. (2) In practically all its manifestations, psychotherapy is based on Freudian theories. (3) With the exception of intelligence testing, psychological contributions consist almost entirely in the administration and interpretation of projective tests, usually along psycho-analytic lines. I have argued in the past, and quoted numerous experiments in support of these arguments, that (1) there is little evidence for the practical efficacy of psychotherapy, whether strictly Freudian or “eclectic” (8, 17); (2) that Freudian theories are outside the realm of science because of their failure to be consistent, or to generate testable deductions (10); and (3), that projective tests are so unreliable and lacking in validity that their use, except in research, cannot be defended (16). I shall not here argue these points again; the evidence on which these views are based is quite strong, and is growing in strength every year. I shall instead try to make a somewhat more constructive contribution by discussing an alternative theory of neurosis, an alternative method of treatment, and an alternative way of using the knowledge and competence of psychologists in the attempted cure of neurotic disorders. It need hardly be emphasized that the brief time at my disposal will make it inevitable that what I have to say will sound much more dogmatic than I would like it to be; I have to ask your indulgence in this respect, and request you to bear in mind all the obvious qualifying clauses which, if included in this paper, would swell it to three times its present size.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Journal of Mental Science , Volume 105 , Issue 438 , January 1959 , pp. 61 - 75
Copyright
Copyright © Royal College of Psychiatrists, 1959 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Anderson, O. P., and Parmenter, A., “A long-term study of the experimental neurosis in the sheep and dog”, Psychosom. Med. Monogr., 1941, 2, Nos. 3 and 4, 1–150.Google Scholar
2. Broadhurst, P. L., “The contribution of animal psychology to the concept of psychological normality-abnormality”. Proc. XIII Internal. Congr. Appl. Psychol., 1958.Google Scholar
3. Idem , “Abnormal animal behaviour”. In Eysenck, H. J. (Ed.) Handbook of Abnormal Psychology, 1959. London: Pitman.Google Scholar
4. Denker, P. G., “Results of treatment of psychoneuroses by the general practitioner. A follow-up study of 500 cases”, New York State J. Med., 1946, 46, 2164–2166.Google Scholar
5. Dollard, J. and Miller, V. G., Personality and Psychotherapy, 1950. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
6. Estes, W. K. et al., Modern Learning Theory, 1954. Appleton-Century.Google Scholar
7. Eysenck, H. J., Dimensions of Personality, 1947. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
8. Idem , “The effects of psychotherapy: an evaluation”, J. consult. Psychol., 1952, 16, 319–324.Google Scholar
9. Idem, The Scientific Study of Personality, 1952. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
10. Idem, Uses and Abuses of Psychology, 1953. London: Pelican.Google Scholar
11. Idem, The Structure of Human Personality, 1953. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
12. Idem , “Zur Theorie der Persönlichkeitsmessung”, Ztchr. f. diag. Psychol., u. Personlichkeitsforschung, 1954, 2, 87–101, 171–187.Google Scholar
13. Idem, Psychology and the Foundation of Psychiatry, 1955. London: H. K. Lewis.Google Scholar
14. Idem , “Los principios del condicionamiento y la teoria de la personalidad”. Riv. de Psycologica, 1957, 12, 655–667.Google Scholar
15. Idem, Dynamics of Anxiety and Hysteria, 1957. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
16. Idem , Personality tests: 1950–1955. In Recent Progress in Psychiatry, Fleming, G. W. T. H. (Ed.), 1959. London: J. and A. Churchill.Google Scholar
17. Idem , The effects of psychotherapy. In Eynsenck, H. J. (Ed.), Handbook of Abnormal Psychology, 1959. London: Pitman.Google Scholar
18. Fenichel, O., The Psychoanalytic Theory of Neurosis, 1945. London: Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
19. Franks, C. M., “Alcohol, alcoholics and conditioning: a review of the literature and some theoretical considerations”, J. ment. Sci., 1958, 104, 14–33.Google Scholar
20. Gantt, W. H., “Experimental basis for neurotic behaviour,” Psychosom. Med. Monogr., 1944, 3, 1–211.Google Scholar
21. Glover, E., The Technique of Psychoanalysis, 1955. London: Baillière.Google Scholar
22. Hebb, D. O., “Spontaneous neurosis in chimpanzees: theoretical relations with clinical and experimental phenomena”, Psychosom. Med., 1947, 9, 3–16.Google Scholar
23. Herzberg, A., “Short treatment of neuroses by graduated tasks”, Brit. J. Med. Psychol., 1941, 19, 36–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
24. Hilgard, G. A., Theories of Learning, 1956. New York: Appleton-Century.Google Scholar
25. Hilgard, E. A. and Marquis, D. G., Conditioning and Learning, 1940. New York: Appleton-Century.Google Scholar
26. Hudson, B. B., “One-trial learning in the domestic rat”, Genet. Psychol. Monogr., 1950, 41, 94–146.Google Scholar
27. Jersild, A. T. and Holmes, F. B., “Methods of overcoming children's fears”, J. Psychol., 1935, 1, 25–83.Google Scholar
28. Jones, H. G., “The application of conditioning and learning techniques to the treatment of a psychiatric patient”, J. abn. soc. Psychol., 1956, 52, 414–420.Google Scholar
29. Idem , “Neurosis and experimental psychology”, J. ment. Sci., 1958, 104, 55–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
30. Masserman, J. K., Behaviour and Neurosis, 1943. Chicago: Univ. Press.Google Scholar
31. McAllister, W. R., “Eyelid conditioning as a function of the CS-UCS interval”, J. exper. Psychol., 1953, 45, 412–422.Google Scholar
32. Idem , “The effect on eyelid conditioning of shifting the CS-UCS interval”, J. exper. Psychol., 1953, 45, 423–428.Google Scholar
33. Meyer, V., “The treatment of two phobic patients on the basis of learning principles”, J. abn. soc. Psychol., 1957, 55, 261–266.Google Scholar
34. Miller, V. G., “Learnable drives and rewards”, Spencer, S. S. (Ed.), Handbook of Experimental Psychology, 1951. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
35. Mowrer, O. H., Learning Theory and Personality Dynamics, 1950. New York: Ronald Press.Google Scholar
36. Mowrer, O. H. and Morer, W. A., “Enuresis. A method for its study and treatment”, Amer. J. Orth. Psychiatry, 1938, 8, 436–447.Google Scholar
37. Munroe, R. L., Schools of Psychoanalytic Thought, 1955. New York: Dryden Press.Google Scholar
38. Osgood, C. E., Method and Theory in Experimental Psychology, 1953. London: Oxford Univ. Press.Google Scholar
39. Pavlov, I. P., Conditioned Reflexes, 1927. London: Oxford Univ. Press.Google Scholar
40. Sherrington, C. S., The Integrative Action of the Central Nervous System, 1926. Oxford: Univ. Press.Google Scholar
41. Shoben, E. J., “Psychotherapy as a problem in learning theory”, Psychol. Bull., 1949, 46, 366–392.Google Scholar
42. Solomon, R. L., Kamin, L. J. and Wynne, L. C., “Traumatic avoidance learning”, J. abnorm. soc. Psychol., 1953, 48, 291–302.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
43. Spence, K. G., Haggard, P. F. and Ross, L. G., “UCS intensity and the associated (habit) strength of the eyelid CR”, J. exp. Psychol., 1958, 95, 404–411.Google Scholar
44. Watson, J. B. and Raynor, R., “Conditioned emotional reaction”, J. exper. Psychol., 1920, 3, 1–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
45. Wolpe, J., “Experimental neurosis as learned behaviour”, Brit. J. Psychol., 1952, 43, 243–268.Google Scholar
46. Idem, Psychotherapy by Reciprocal Inhibition, 1958. Stanford: Univ. Press.Google Scholar
47. Yates, A., “The application of learning theory to the treatment of tics”, J. abnorm. soc. Psychol., 1958, 56, 175–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.