Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T18:13:43.348Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Korsakov Syndrome in Spontaneous Subarachnoid Haemorrhage

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 February 2018

John N. Walton
John N. Walton*
Affiliation:
From the Department of Medicine, King's College, University of Durham, and the Royal Victoria Infirmary, Newcastle upon Tyne
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The amnestic-confabulatory symptom-complex to which the eponymous title of Korsakov's syndrome is usually given was probably first described by the Swedish physician Magnus Huss (1807–90), who spent the greater part of his lifetime in the study of alcoholism. There is, however, no doubt that Korsakov's (1890) paper on the subject gave an excellent description of the syndrome, and stressed the fact that whereas it often developed in patients with alcoholism and polyneuritis, numerous other metabolic and neurological disorders could be complicated by the characteristic mental changes. Indeed, in Korsakov's (1890) own series of cases alcoholics were in the minority. One of the neurological conditions in which the syndrome has been described significantly often is spontaneous subarachnoid haemorrhage. The first reports of the association were probably those of Flatau (1918 and 1921), and it was discussed in some detail by Goldflam (1923) and Herman (1925 and 1926). Each of these authors described the mental symptoms exhaustively but gave no actual case-histories; the first fully documented cases in the literature were the two reported by Hall (1929). Single cases have since been described by Cubitt (1930), Popow (1930) and Kulkow (1935), and in 1939 Tarachow gave an extensive review of the literature and reported an additional 3 cases. It is remarkable that since 1939 the association has received little attention, although it has been mentioned by Sands (1941) and Meadows (1951).

Type
Part I.—Original Articles
Information
Journal of Mental Science , Volume 99 , Issue 416 , July 1953 , pp. 521 - 530
Copyright
Copyright © Royal College of Psychiatrists, 1953 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aronov, D. N., Klinichsky J. Saratov, 1928, 5, 561 (abstracted in J. Amer. med. Ass., 1929, 92, 189.Google Scholar
Ask-Upmark, E., and Ingvar, D., Acta med. Scand., 1950, 138, 15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barrett, A. M., Amer. J. Insan., 1913, 69, 1063.Google Scholar
Bleuler, M., Brit. Med. J., 1951. ii, 1233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brocklehurst, T., Lancet, 1934, ii, 654.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carmichael, E. A., and Stern, R. O. Brain, 1931, 54, 189.Google Scholar
Climenko, H., N.Y. med. J., 1920. 111, 531.Google Scholar
Cubitt, A. W., Brit. Med. J., 1930, ii, 212.Google Scholar
Davis, C. C., Lancet, 1929, i, 670.Google Scholar
Ely, F. A., J. Nerv. Ment. Dis., 1922, 56, 115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flatau, E., 1918, personal communication to Goldflam (1923).Google Scholar
Idem, Gaz. Hôp., Paris, 1921, 94, 1077.Google Scholar
Foerster, O., and Gagel, O., Z. ges. Neurol. Psychiat., 1933, 149, 312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Froin, G., Thèse de Paris, 1904. Paris: Steinheil.Google Scholar
Gamper, E., Dtsch. Z. Nervenheilk., 1928, 102, 122.Google Scholar
Goldflam, S., ibid., 1923, 76, 158.Google Scholar
Hall, A. J., Brit. Med. J., 1929, i, 1025.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herman, E., Rev. neurol., 1925, 1, 993.Google Scholar
Idem, Z. ges. Neurol. Psychiat., 1926, 105, 667.Google Scholar
Kelly, R., Brain, 1951, 74, 23.Google Scholar
Kirby, G. H., and Davis, T. K., Arch. Neurol. Psychiat., Chicago, 1921, 5, 491.Google Scholar
Klemperer, E., and Weissman, M., Nervenarzt, 1930, 3, 291.Google Scholar
Korsakov, S., Allg. Z. Psychiat., 1890, 46, 475.Google Scholar
Krayenbuhl, H., and Luthy, F., Schweiz. Arch. Neurol. Psychiat., 1948, 61, 7.Google Scholar
Kulkow, A. E., Mschr. Psychiat. Neurol., 1935, 90, 227.Google Scholar
Magee, C. G., Lancet, 1943. ii, 497.Google Scholar
Meadows, S. P., in Modern Trends in Neurology, 1951, ed by Feiling, A. London: Butterworth.Google Scholar
Meyer, A., J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychtat., 1944. 7, 66.Google Scholar
Meyer, E., Arch. Psychiat. Nervenkr, 1899, 32, 320.Google Scholar
Idem, Neurol. Zbl., 1904, 23, 710.Google Scholar
Parfitt, D. N., J. Neurol. Psychopath., 1934, 15, 12.Google Scholar
Pickett, W., Amer. J. Med. Sci., 1904, 127, 1032.Google Scholar
Pluvinage, R., Sem. Hôp., Paris, 1949, 25, 2672.Google Scholar
Roemheld, L., Arch. Psychiat. Nervenkr., 1906, 41, 703.Google Scholar
Roth, M., Proc. R. Soc. Med., 1952, 45, 369.Google Scholar
Sands, I. J., Arch. Neurol. Psychiat., Chicago, 1941, 46, 973.Google Scholar
Silverman, S., J. Ment. Sci., 1949, 95, 706.Google Scholar
Sittig, O., Mschr. Psychiat. Neurol., 1912, 32, 241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tarachow, S., Amer. J. Psychiat., 1939, 95, 887.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vermelin, H., and Louijot, J., Bull. Soc. Obstét. Gynéc. Paris, 1936, 25, 91.Google Scholar
Walton, J. N., M.D. Thesis, University of Durham, 1952.Google Scholar
Wolf, G. A., Goodell, H., and Wolff, H. G., J. Amer. med. Ass., 1945, 129, 715.Google Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.