Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T03:32:01.175Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Juvenile Amaurotic Idiocy: A Case Report

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 February 2018

John Johnson
John Johnson*
Affiliation:
The Maudsley Hospital, London
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The first clinical histories of this condition were reported in Norway by Stengel (1826). Batten (1903) described changes in the macula in two members of a family who had undergone progressive mental deterioration with loss of visual and motor functions. Vogt (1906) published similar cases and attempted to delimit them as a juvenile form of Tay Sachs disease. It differed from the infantile form in that it occurred in childhood after a period of normal development; the rate of progression was slower; it was not limited to Jewish children and the ophthalmological appearances were those of optic atrophy. The following year Spielmeyer described the pathological changes in juvenile Tay Sachs disease as essentially similar to the infantile form. Further detailed pathological studies were made by Greenfield and Holmes (1925).

Type
Original Articles
Information
Journal of Mental Science , Volume 107 , Issue 450 , September 1961 , pp. 931 - 935
Copyright
Copyright © Royal College of Psychiatrists, 1961 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

van Bagh, K., and Hortung, H., Nord. Med., 1948, 38, 1072.Google Scholar
Batten, E., Trans Ophthal. Soc. U.K., 1903, 23, 390.Google Scholar
Cobb, W. A., Martin, F., and Pampiglione, G., Brain, 1952, 75, 343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crawley, J. W., J. Paediat., 1957, 51, 571.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crocker, A. C., Medicine, 1958, 37, 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ford, C., et al., Lancet, 1959, i, 709.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenfield, J. G., and Holmes, G., Brain, 1925, 48, 183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jelgersma, H. C., Psychiat. Neurol. Neurochir., 1960, 63, 198.Google Scholar
Lejeune, L., Gauthier, M., and Turpin, R., C.R. Acad. Sci., 1959, 248, 602. Paris.Google Scholar
Mittwoch, U., Brit. J. Haemat., 1959, 5, 365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morrell, F., and Torres, F., Brain, 1960, 83, 213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mott, F. W., Arch. Neurol. (L.C.C.), 1907, 3, 218.Google Scholar
Nissen, A. I., Nord. Med., 1954, 52, 1542.Google Scholar
Penrose, L. S., Recent Advances in Human Genetics, 1961. London: Churchill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Polani, P. E., Lancet, 1960, i, 721.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rayner, S., Acta Genet., Basel, 1952, 3, 1.Google Scholar
Sjögren, T., Hereditas, 1931, 14, 197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spiegel-Adolf, M., Amer. J. Dis. Child., 1959, 97, 679.Google Scholar
Stengel, C., Beretning om et Maerkeligt Sygdomstilfaelde hos fire S⊘dskende i Naerheden af R⊘raas, 1826. Eyr. 347.Google Scholar
Teglbjaerg, H. P. S., and Plum, C. M., Acta Psychiat. Scand., 1955, 30, 327.Google Scholar
Vogt, H., Mschr. Psychiat. Neurol., 1906, 18, 161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.