Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-03T01:14:55.807Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Intravenous Acetylcholine Therapy in Neurosis

A Controlled Clinical Trial

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 February 2018

J. R. Hawkings  and
R. W. Tibbetts
J. R. Hawkings
Affiliation:
From the Midland Hospital for Nervous Diseases, United Birmingham Hospitals
R. W. Tibbetts
Affiliation:
From the Midland Hospital for Nervous Diseases, United Birmingham Hospitals
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

It is now several years since acetylcholine was first administered intramuscularly in the symptomatic treatment of anxiety, on the theory that anxiety was sympathicotonic in nature and could be counteracted by the vagotonic action of acetylcholine. Unfortunately decomposition of acetylcholine is so rapid that there is little time for this action to be effective, and the majority of investigators believe that it has no effect, or at least a momentary one, when given either subcutaneously or intramuscularly. Maxwell Jones (1936) used carbachol, a drug with a similar but more prolonged action than acetylcholine to treat six patients with anxiety neurosis. He was able to report relief from the psychic and somatic symptoms of anxiety in all cases but unfortunately, following withdrawal of the drug, they tended to relapse. An entirely different rationale led Tomasson (1936) to claim both alleviation and shortening of the duration of attacks of mania in manic depressive psychotics using a combined ephedrine and acetylcholine treatment.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Journal of Mental Science , Volume 102 , Issue 426 , January 1956 , pp. 43 - 51
Copyright
Copyright © Royal College of Psychiatrists, 1956 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alexandre, H., and Almeida, VY. de Se, J. brasil, psiquiat., 1951, 1, 344.Google Scholar
Au, V., Cervello, 1940, 19, 121.Google Scholar
Borgarello, G., Schizofrenie (Supp.), 1939, 7, 83.Google Scholar
Cohen, L. H., Thale, N. J., and Tissenbaum, M. J., Arch. Neurol. Psychiat., 1944, 51, 171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Demetrio, F., Arch. Neuropsiq., S. Paulo, 1945, 3, 34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferrio, C., Allg. Z. Psychiat., 1942, 119, 268.Google Scholar
Fiamberti, A. M., G. Psichiat. Neuropat., 1939, 67, 270.Google Scholar
Idem , Méd. int., 1947, 55, 60.Google Scholar
Idem , Cong. Int. Psychiat. (Paris), 1950, 4, 70.Google Scholar
Harris, M. M., and Pacella, B. L., Arch. Neurol. Psychiat., 1943, 50, 304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ibor, J. Lopez, Cong. Int. Psychiat. (Paris), 1950, 4, 85.Google Scholar
Jones, M. S., J. Ment. Sci., 1936, 82, 785.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kulcsar, I., and Lajtavari, L., Orv. Hétil., 1940, 84, 33.Google Scholar
Idem , Proc. R. Soc. Med., 1952, 45, 511.Google Scholar
Maclay, D. T., J. Ment. Sci., 1953, 99, 809.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Phillips, R. M., and Hutchinson, J. T., Brit. med. J., 1954, i, 1468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poort, R., and Stigaard, A., Nord. med., 1944, 21, 55.Google Scholar
Sacristan Hernandes de Tejada, J. M., Farmacoter. act., 1947, 4, 673.Google Scholar
Sandri, P., Cervello, 1940, 19, 67.Google Scholar
Sargant, W., Proc. R. Soc. Med., 1952, 45, 515.Google Scholar
Schaeffer, H., Pr. méd., 1947, 55, 505.Google Scholar
Sogliani, G., Rass. Studi psichiat., 1951, 40, 291.Google Scholar
Stigaard, A., Acta med. scand., 1944, 118, 313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tibbetts, R. W., and Hawkings, J. R., J. Ment. Sci., 1956, 102, 60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tomasson, H., J. Ment. Sci., 1936, 82, 595.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.