Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T12:56:54.867Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Inability in Delirium to Name the Physician's Vocation on Command, with Retention of the Ability to Name it Spontaneously: An Illustration of Hughlings Jackson's Law of “Reduction to a More Automatic Condition”

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 February 2018

Max Levin*
Affiliation:
Baltimore, Maryland

Extract

In talking to delirious patients I have observed a curious and characteristic phenomenon: the patient, in spontaneous conversation, addresses me as “Doctor”, yet when the very next moment I ask him my vocation he cannot answer correctly. I propose to show that this is not merely a capricious phenomenon without meaning, but that it demonstrates the soundness of one of Hughlings Jackson's most important principles. I have observed the phenomenon in no less than nine cases of delirium, and more than once in several. Three cases will serve as examples.

Type
Part I.—Original Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Royal College of Psychiatrists, 1939 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bracketed figures refer to volume and page of the Selected Writings of John Hughlings Jackson, 1931-32 (Hodder & Stoughton, London).

“Automatic “and” voluntary “are inverse terms. See my paper,“Degrees of Automatic Action: Some Psychiatric Applications of Hughlings Jackson's Concept of 4 Reduction to a More Automatic Condition’”, Journ. Neurol. and Psychopathol., 1936, xvii, p. 153.

This is meant as an anatomical and not a morphological statement; see Jackson's distinction between these (I, 239, footnote; II, 155, 473).

Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.