Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T12:22:57.149Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Further Experimental Study of Using Perceptual Errors As an Aid to Diagnosis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 February 2018

D. Walton
D. Walton*
Affiliation:
Rainhill Hospital, Near Liverpool, and Winwick Hospital, Warrington
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Some neurotic patients exhibit such a complex symptomatology that it is often difficult to determine, by present methods, which problems or areas of difficulty are fundamental. Much time may therefore be lost through the treatment of superficial rather than basic sources of difficulty.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Journal of Mental Science , Volume 103 , Issue 432 , July 1957 , pp. 556 - 580
Copyright
Copyright © Royal College of Psychiatrists, 1957 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alper, T. G., “Memory for completed and incompleted tasks as a function of personality”, J. abnorm. and soc. Psychol., 1946, 41, 403—421.Google Scholar
Beier, E. G., and Cowen, E. L., “A further investigation of the influence of ‘Threat-Expectancy’ on Perception”, J. Person., 1953, 22, 254—57.Google Scholar
Belmont, L., and Birch, H. G., “Re-individualizing the repression hypothesis”, J. abnorm. and soc. Psychol., 1951, 46, 226—35.Google Scholar
Birch, H. G., “The role of motivational factors in insightful problem-solving”, J. Comp. Psychol., 1945, 38, 295—317.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bitterman, M. E., and Kniffen, C. W., “Manifest anxiety and ‘perceptual defense’,” J. abnorm. and soc. Psychol., 1953, 48. 248–52.Google Scholar
Blum, G. S., “An experimental reunion of psychoanalytic theory with perceptual vigilance and defense”, J. abnorm. and soc. Psychol., 1954, 49, 94—98.Google Scholar
Idem , “Perceptual defense revisited. Abstract of paper presented to the American Psychological Association meeting, 5 September, 1954”, Amer. J. Psychol, 1954, 9, 335.Google Scholar
Brickner, P. D., and Chapanis, A., “Do incorrectly perceived tachistoscopic stimuli convey some information?”, Psychol. Rev., 1953, 60, 181—88.Google Scholar
Bruner, J. S., and Postman, L., “Emotional selectivity in perception and reaction”, J. Pers., 1947, 16, 69—77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bruner, J. S., and Goodman, C. C., “Value and need as organizing factors in perception”, J. abnorm. and soc. Psychol., 1947, 42, 33—44.Google Scholar
Bruner, J. S., and Postman, L., “On the perception of incongruity; a paradigm”, J. Pers., 1949, 18, 206—23.Google Scholar
Idem , “Perception, cognition and behavior”, J. Pers., 1949, 18, 14—31.Google Scholar
Bruner, J. S., “Personality dynamics and the process of perceiving”. In Blake, R. R. and Ramsey, G. V. (eds.) Perception: an Approach to Personality, 1951. New York: Ronald.Google Scholar
Chodorkoff, B., “Self-perception, perceptual defense and adjustment”, J. abnorm. and soc. Psychol, 1954, 49, 508—12.Google Scholar
Cowen, E. L., and Beier, E. G., “The influence of ‘Threat-expectancy’ on Perception”, J. Person., 1950, 19, 85—94.Google Scholar
Idem , “Threat-expectancy, word frequencies, and perceptual pre-recognition hypotheses”, J. abnorm. and soc. Psychol., 1954, 49, 178—82.Google Scholar
Dembo, T., “Anger as a dynamic problem”, Psychol. Forsch., 1931, 15, 1—144.Google Scholar
Eriksen, C. W., “Perceptual defense as a function of unacceptable needs”, J. abnorm. and soc. Psychol., 1951, 46, 557—64.Google Scholar
Idem , “Defense against ego-threat in memory and perception”, J. abnorm. and soc. Psychol., 1952, 47, 230—36.Google Scholar
Idem , “Individual differences in defensive forgetting”, J. Exper. Psychol., 1952, 44, 442—47.Google Scholar
Idem , “The case for perceptual defense”, Psychol. Rev., 1954, 61, 175—82.Google Scholar
Eriksen, C. W., “Psychological defenses and ‘ego-strength’ in the recall of completed and incompleted tasks”, J. abnorm. and soc. Psychol., 1954, 49, 45—50.Google Scholar
Eysenck, H. J., Dimensions of Personality, 1947. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul, Ltd.Google Scholar
Idem , “A dynamic theory of anxiety and hysteria”, J. Ment. Sci., 1955, 101, 422.Google Scholar
Freeman, J. J., “Set or perceptual defense”, J. Exper. Psychol., 1954, 48, 283—88.Google Scholar
Freud, S., New Introductory Lectures on Psycho-Analysis, 1949. London: The International Psycho-Analytic Library, Hogarth Press and Institute of Psycho-Analysis. Reprint of 1933 edition.Google Scholar
Glixman, A. F., “Recall of completed and incompleted activities under varying degrees of stress”, J. exp. Psychol., 1949, 39, 281—95.Google Scholar
Goldstein, S., “A projective study of psychoanalytic mechanisms of defense”, Paper read at Amer. Psychol. Assoc., Washington, D.C., September, 1952.Google Scholar
Hathaway, S. R., and McKinley, J. C., Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory, 1951. New York: The Psychological Corporation.Google ScholarPubMed
Hochberg, J. E., and Gleitman, H., “Towards a reformulation of the perception-motivation dichotomy”, J. Person., 1949, 18, 180—91.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Howes, D. H., and Solomon, R. L., “A note on McGinnies' emotionality and perceptual defense”, Psychol. Rev., 1950, 57, 229—34.Google Scholar
Idem , “Visual duration thresholds as a function of word probability”, J. exp. Psychol., 1951, 41, 401—10.Google Scholar
Howes, D. H., “On the interpretation of word frequency as a variable affecting speed of recognition”, J. exper. Psychol., 1954, 48, 106—112.Google Scholar
Howie, D., “Perceptual defense”, Psychol. Rev., 1952, 59, 308—15.Google Scholar
Kleinman, M. L., “Psychogenic deafness and perceptual defense”. Abstract of paper presented to the American Psychological Association Meeting, 5 September, 1954, Amer. J. Psychol., 1954, 9, 406.Google Scholar
Krech, D., and Crutchfield, R. S., Theory and Problems of Social Psychology, 1948. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Kurland, S. H., “The lack of generality in defense mechanisms as indicated in auditory perception”, J. abnorm. and soc. Psychol., 1954, 49, 173—77.Google Scholar
Lacey, O. W., Levinger, N., and Adamson, J. F., “Foreknowledge as a factor affecting perceptual defense and alertness”, J. Exp. Psychol., 1953, 45, 169—74.Google Scholar
Lazarus, R. S., and McCleary, R. A., “Autonomic discrimination without awareness: a study of subception”, Psychol. Rev., 1951, 58, 113—22.Google Scholar
Lazarus, R. S., and Longo, N., “The consistency of psychological defenses against threat”, J. abnorm. and soc. Psychol., 1953, 48, 495 99.Google Scholar
Lazarus, R. S., “Is there a mechanism of perceptual defense? A reply to Postman, Bronson and Gropper”, J. abnorm. and soc. Psychol., 1954, 49, 396—98.Google Scholar
Levine, R., Chein, I., and Murphy, G., “The relation of intensity of a need to the amount of perceptual distortion”, J. Psychol., 1942, 13, 283—93.Google Scholar
Luchins, A. S., “On an approach to social perception”, J. Person., 1950, 19, 64—85.Google Scholar
Idem , “An evaluation of some current criticisms of Gestalt psychological work on perception”, Psychol. Rev., 1951, 58, 69—95.Google Scholar
Lysak, W., “The effects of punishment upon syllable recognition thresholds”, J. Exp. Psychol., 1954, 47, 343—50.Google Scholar
McCleary, R. A., and Lazarus, R. S., “Autonomic discrimination without awareness”, J. Person., 1949, 18, 171—79.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McGinnies, E., “Emotionality and perceptual defense”, Psychol. Rev., 1949, 56, 244—51.Google Scholar
Murdock, B. B. Jr., “Perceptual defense and threshold measurements”, J. Person., 1954, 22, 565—71.Google Scholar
Murray, H. A., Explorations in Personality, 1938. New York: Oxford.Google Scholar
Postman, L., Bruner, J. S., and McGinnies, E., “Personal values as selective factors in perception”, abnorm. and soc. Psychol., 1948, 43, 142—54.Google Scholar
Postman, L., and Bruner, J. S., “Multiplicity of set as a determinant of perceptual behavior”, J. Exp. Psychol., 1949, 39, 369—77.Google Scholar
Postman, L., “Toward a general theory of cognition”. In Rohrer, J. H. and Sherif, M. (eds.): Social Psychology at the Crossroads, 1951. 242–72. New York: Harper.Google Scholar
Idem , “On the problem of perceptual defense”, Psychol. Rev., 1953, 60, 298—306.Google Scholar
Idem , “Perception, motivation and behavior”, J. Person., 1953, 22, 17—31.Google Scholar
Idem , Bronson, W. C., and Gropper, G. L., “Is there a mechanism of perceptual defense”, J. abnorm. and soc. Psychol., 1953, 48, 2.Google Scholar
Rosenstock, I. M., “Perceptual aspects of repression”, J. abnorm. and soc. Psychol., 1951, 46, 304—15.Google Scholar
Rosenzweig, S., and Sarason, S., “An experimental study of the triadic hypothesis: Reaction to frustration, ego-defense, and hypnotizability. I. Correlational approach”, Charact. and Pers., 1942, 11, 1—20.Google Scholar
Rosenzweig, S., “An experimental study of ‘repression’ with special reference to need- persistive and ego-defensive reactions to frustration”, J. Exp. Psychol., 1943, 32, 64—74.Google Scholar
Sanford, R. N., “The effect of abstinence from food upon imaginal processes, a preliminary experiment”, J. Psychol., 1936, 2, 129—36.Google Scholar
Sanford, R. N., “The effects of abstinence from food upon imaginal processes: a further experiment”, J. Psychol., 1937, 3, 145—59.Google Scholar
Schafer, R., and Murphy, G., “The role of autism in a visual figure-ground relationship”, J. Exp. Psychol., 1943, 32, 335—43.Google Scholar
Shapiro, M. B., “An experimental approach to diagnostic psychological testing”, J. Ment. Sci., 1951, 97, 409.Google Scholar
Idem , “Experimental studies of a perceptual anomaly. I. Initial experiments”, J. Ment. Sci., 1951, 97, 90.Google Scholar
Solomon, R. L., and Howes, D. H., “Word frequency, personal values, and visual duration thresholds”, Psychol. Rev., 1951, 58, 256—70.Google Scholar
Solomon, R. L., and Postman, L., “Frequency of usage as a determinant of recognition thresholds for words”, J. exp. Psychol., 1952, 43, 195—201.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Taylor, Janet A., “The relationship of anxiety to the conditioned eyelid response”, J. Exp. Psychol., 1951, 41, 81—92.Google Scholar
Idem , “A personality scale of manifest anxiety”, J. abnorm. and soc. Psychol, 1953, 48, 285—90.Google Scholar
Thorndike, E. L., and Lorge, I., Teacher's Word Book of 30,000 Words, 1944. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Walton, D., “An experimental study of a method of using perceptual errors as an aid to diagnosis”, J. Ment. Sci., 1954, 100, 420.Google Scholar
Zubin, J., “Objective studies of disordered persons”, from Methods of Psychology, by Andrews, T. G., pp. 595—623. London: Chapman and Hall.Google Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.