Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T10:37:28.707Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Experimental Error in Enumeration of Leucocytes and Its Application to the Hæmoclastic Crisis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 February 2018

Irene Yates
Affiliation:
From the Central Pathological Laboratory of the London County Mental Hospitals
John C. Batt
Affiliation:
From the Central Pathological Laboratory of the London County Mental Hospitals

Extract

The object of this paper is to show that certain errors are inevitable when white blood-cells are enumerated, and to demonstrate that results from such enumerations must be interpreted with mathematical considerations. In the past the mathematical applications have, to a large extent, been ignored, and only the actual experimental figures considered. Here an endeavour is made to correlate the two, and to refer to various fallacies that may be present when conclusions from such results are under consideration.

Type
Part I.—Original Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Royal College of Psychiatrists, 1932 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Brandt, , Folia Hæm., 1925-26, xxxii, p. 175.Google Scholar
2 Reichel, and Monasterio, , Klin. Woch., 1929, p. 1712.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3 Reichel, , Folia Hæm., 1930, xli, p. 307.Google Scholar
4 Alport, , Lancet, 1922, ii, p. 758.Google Scholar
5 Shaw, , Brit. Med. Journ., 1925, i, p. 914.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6 Robertson, , Journ. Ment. Sci., 1925, lxxi, p. 386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7 Idem , ibid., 1926, lxxii, p. 356.Google Scholar
8 Michailow, , Folia Ham., 1925-26, xxxii, p. 196.Google Scholar
9 Widal, , Presse Méd., 1920, p. 893.Google Scholar
10 Idem., ibid., 1921, p. 121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11 Holzer, and Schilling, , Zeitschr. f. klin. Med., 1922, p. 302.Google Scholar
12 Bauer, , Deut. Med. Woch., 1921, p. 1519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13 Erdman, , Med. Klin., Berlin, 1922, p. 14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14 Rausche, , Münch. med. Woch., 1926, i, p. 441.Google Scholar
15 Matzdorff, , Zeitschr. f. d. ges. Neur. u. Psychiat., 1923, lxxxi, p. 181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16 Glaser, , Med. Klin., Berlin, 1922, ii, p. 331.Google Scholar
17 Feinblatt, , Journ. Amer. Med. Assoc., 1923, lviii, p. 613.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18 Eisenstädt, , Klin. Woch., 1922, xxxvi, p. 1796.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19 Wilson, , Brit. Med. Journ., 1922, ii, p. 1061.Google Scholar
20 Tinel, and Santenoise, , Presse Méd., 1922, p. 321.Google Scholar
21 Tinel, , Journ. de Méd. et de Chir. Prat., 1922, xciii, p. 84.Google Scholar
22 Pagniez, and Lieutaud, , Presse Méd., 1919, p. 693.Google Scholar
23 Martin, F. R., Journ. Ment. Sci., 1924, lxx, p. 554.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
24 Thomas, Rees and Lascelles, , ibid., 1927, lxxiii, p. 246.Google Scholar
25 Fuchs, , Zeitschr. f. d. ges. Neur. u. Psychiat., 1927, cxiii, p. 426.Google Scholar
26 Leher, , Rajki, and Torok, , Arch. f. Derm., 1927, cliii, p. 375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
27 Didier, and Philippe, , Presse Méd., 1921, p. 473.Google Scholar
28 Crainicianu, and Popper, , ibid., 1921, p. 424.Google Scholar
29 Fisher, , Statistical Methods for Research Workers, p. 56.Google Scholar
30 Student, , Biometrika, 1906–07, v, p. 351.Google Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.