Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-03T18:10:27.909Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Contribution of the Rorschach Method to Clinical Diagnosis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 February 2018

W. Donald Ross
W. Donald Ross*
Affiliation:
Montreal, Canada
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The Rorschach method is valuable in the study of personality and claims have been made for its application to clinical diagnosis. Clinicians would welcome any method which would help to distinguish “psychoneurotic” from “organic” disease. There is a tendency, however, to demand from a new and unfamiliar method a complete diagnosis, rather than that the technique should provide standardized information which can be used towards a diagnosis by the clinician along with other methods. Psychologists using the Rorschach method have played into this expectation to some extent and have sought to present sets of signs and types of Rorschach records which could be considered as suggesting certain definite diagnoses. This paper is concerned with the study in a wide range of patients of some of the signs obtainable by the Rorschach technique in an effort to determine what degree of specificity can be attributed to them, and what likelihood of success and failure is attached to their use.

Type
Part I.—Original Articles
Information
Journal of Mental Science , Volume 87 , Issue 368 , July 1941 , pp. 331 - 348
Copyright
Copyright © Royal College of Psychiatrists, 1941 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

(1) Booth, C. G. (1939), “Objective Technics in Personality Testing,” Arch. Neurol. and Psychiat., 42, 514–530 (September).Google Scholar
(2) Harrower-Erickson, M. R. (1940), “Personality Changes Accompanying Cerebral Lesions. I. Rorschach Studies of Patients with Cerebral Tumours,” ibid., 43, 859–890 (May).Google Scholar
(3) Piotrowski, Z. (1936), “On the Rorschach Method and its Application in Organic Disturbances of the Central Nervous System,” Rorschach Research Exchange, 1, No. 2, 23–37 (November).Google Scholar
(4) Idem (1937), “The Rorschach Ink-blot Method in Organic Disturbances of the Central Nervous System,” J. Nerv. Ment. Dis., 86, 525–537 (November).Google Scholar
(5) Miale, and Harrower-Erickson, (1940), “Personality Structure in the Psychoneuroses,” Rorschach Research Exchange, 4, No. 2, 71–74 (April).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(6) Harrower-Erickson, M. R. (1940), “Personality Changes Accompanying Cerebral Lesions. II. Rorschach Studies of Patients with Focal Epilepsy,” Arch. Neurol. and Psychiat., 48, 1081–1107 (June).Google Scholar
(7) Piotrowski, Z. (1940), personal communication (October).Google Scholar
(8) Rorschach, H. (1932), Psychodiagnostik, ed. 2. Bern: Hans Huber.Google Scholar
(9) Oberholtzer, E. (1931), “Zur Differential diagnosepsychischer Folgezustande nach Schädeltraumen mittels des Rorschachsen Formdeutversuchs,” Z. Neur., 136, 596–629, cited by Piotrowski.Google Scholar
(10) Klopfer, and Sender, (1936), “A System of Refined Scoring Symbols,” Rorschach Research Exchange, 1, No. 2, 19–22 (November).Google Scholar
(11) Piotrowski, Z. (1937), “The M, FM and m Responses as Indicators of Changes in Personality,” ibid., 1, No. 5, 148–156 (July).Google Scholar
(12) Idem (1940), “Positive and Negative Rorschach Organic Reactions,” ibid., 4, No. 4, 147–151 (October).Google Scholar
(13) Klopfer, Bruno (1939), personal instruction (December).Google Scholar
(14) Ross, W. D. (1940), “Anatomical Perseveration in Rorschach Records” (presented to the first annual meeting of the Rorschach Institute, New York, June, 1940), Rorschach Research Exchange, 4, No. 4, 138–145 (October).Google Scholar
(15) Mainland, (1938), The Treatment of Clinical and Laboratory Data. Edinburgh and London: Oliver & Boyd.Google Scholar
(16) Benjamin, and Ebaugh, (1938), “The Diagnostic Validity of the Rorschach Test,” Amer. J. Psychiat., 94, 163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(17) Brosin, and Fromm, (1940), “Rorschach and Colour Blindness,” Rorschach Research Exchange, 4, No. 2, 39–70 (April).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
(18) Miale, F. (1940), personal communication (October).Google Scholar
(19) Ross, W. D. (1940), “The ‘Anxiety Neurosis’ Rorschach Record compared with the Typical Basically Neurotic Record,” Rorschach Research Exchange, 4, No. 3, 134–137 (July).Google Scholar
(20) Sargant, and Slater, (1940), “Acute War Neuroses,” Lancet, ii, No. 1, 1–2 (July).Google Scholar
(21) Penfield, and Erickson, , Epilepsy and Cerebral Localization. Springfield: Charles Thomas (to be published).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.