Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T20:41:40.387Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Comparison of the Personality Changes After (1) Prefrontal Selective Surgery for the Relief of Intractable Pain and for the Treatment of Mental Cases; (2) Cingulectomy and Topectomy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 February 2018

Jacques Le Beau  and
Asenath Petrie
Jacques Le Beau
Affiliation:
Hôpital Lariboisière, Paris
Asenath Petrie
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Institute of Psychiatry, Maudsley Hospital, London
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Extensive lesions of the frontal lobes are followed by pronounced personality changes. This has been shown beyond doubt by the effect of neuro-surgery performed for the removal of brain tumours or for the relief of mental illness. To identify such changes and the lesions responsible for them at least four conditions seem necessary: (a) Knowledge of the limits, variations and connections of the main pre-frontal areas.—In this field the researches of Professor Alfred Meyer and his associates, Mrs. Beck and T. McLardy, are of primary importance (1950).

Type
Part I.—Original Articles
Information
Journal of Mental Science , Volume 99 , Issue 414 , January 1953 , pp. 53 - 61
Copyright
Copyright © Royal College of Psychiatrists, 1953 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Beck, E., McLardy, T., and Meyer, A., “Anatomical Comments on Psycho-surgical Procedures,” J. Ment. Sci., 1950, 96, 157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cattell, R. B., Description and Measurement of Personality, 1946. New York: Yonkerson-Hudson.Google Scholar
Chapman, W. P., Rose, A. S., and Solomon, H. C., “Measurement of Heat Stimulus producing Motor Withdrawal Reactions in Patients following Frontal Lobotomy,” Res. Nerv. Ment. Dis., 1948, 27, 754.Google Scholar
Crown, S., “Psychological Changes following Prefrontal Leucotomy,” J. Ment. Sci., 1951, 97, 49.Google Scholar
Eysenck, H. J., Dimensions of Personality, 1947. London: Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Idem, The Scientific Study of Personality, 1952. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Eysenck, Margaret Davies, “Neurotic Tendencies in Epilepsy,” J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiat., 1950, 13, 237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Idem , “Cognitive Factors in Epilepsy,” ibid., 1952, 15, 39.Google Scholar
Fleming, G. W. T. H., Recent Progress in Psychiatry, 1950, 2nd ed. London: J. & A. Churchill.Google Scholar
Gaches, J., Thesis, Paris, 1952. In the Press.Google Scholar
Le Beau, J., “Experience with Topectomy for the Relief of Intractable Pain,” J. of Neurosurg., 1950a, 6, 79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Idem , “Sur la resection du cortex frontal interne dans l'épilepsie généralisée,” Rev. Neurol., 1950b, 83, 401 and 592, and 1951, 84, 63.Google Scholar
Idem , “The Surgical Uncertainties of Prefrontal Topectomy and Leucotomy,” J. Ment. Sci., 1951, 97, 480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Idem , “Post-operative Syndromes in Selective Prefrontal Surgery,” ibid., 1952, 98, 12.Google Scholar
Idem and Pecker, J., “La topectomie péricalleuse anteriéure bilaterale,” Rev. Neurol., 1949, 81, 1039.Google Scholar
Idem , “Étude de certaines formes d'agitation psychomotrice au cours de l'épilepsie et de l'arrièration mentale, traitées par la topectomie pericalleuse antérieure bilaterale,” Semaine des Hôp. de Paris, 1950, 26, 1536.Google Scholar
Livingstone, R., personal communication, 1952.Google Scholar
Lord, E., “The Use of Range in Place of Standard Deviation in the t Test,” Biometrika, 1947, 34, 41–67.Google Scholar
Meyer, A., “Anatomical Lessons from Prefrontal Leucotomy,” Proc. Int. Cong. Psychiat., 1950, 3, 107. Paris: Hermann & Cie.Google Scholar
Petrie, A., “Personality Changes after Prefrontal Leucotomy,” Proc. 12th Int. Cong. Psychol., Edinburgh, 1948.Google Scholar
Idem , “Preliminary Report of Changes after Prefrontal Leucotomy,” J. Ment. Sci., 1949a, 95, 449.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Idem , “Personality Changes after Prefrontal Leucotomy,” Report II, Brit. J. Med. Psychol., 1949b, 22, 200.Google Scholar
Idem , Anglo-American Symposium, Proc. R. Soc. Med., 1949c, 42, Supp. p. 39.Google Scholar
Idem , “Psychological Investigations and Cerebral Anatomy,” Proc. First World Cong. Psychiat., Paris, 1950.Google Scholar
Idem , “A Comparison of the Psychological Changes following on Two Different Types of Incision on the Frontal Lobes,” Proc. 13th Int. Cong. Psychol., Stockholm, 1951.Google Scholar
Idem , “A Comparison of the Psychological Effects of Different Types of Operations on the Frontal Lobes,” J. Ment. Sci., 1952a, 98, 411.Google Scholar
Idem, Personality and the Frontal Lobes, 1952b. 188 pp. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul. Philadelphia: Blakiston, 1952b.Google Scholar
Pool, L., personal communication, 1947, 1952.Google Scholar
Ward, A., personal communication, 1948, 1952.Google Scholar
Whitty, C. W. M., Duffield, J. E., Tow, P. M., and Cairns, H., “Anterior Cingulectomy in the Treatment of Mental Disease,” Lancet, 1952, 262, 475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.