Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T13:08:36.805Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Artificial Psychoses Produced by Mescaline

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 February 2018

Erich Guttmann
Erich Guttmann*
Affiliation:
The Maudsley Hospital, London
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Progress in general medicine is brought about by clinical observation or carefully controlled experimental research. In psychiatry there is little opportunity for the latter approach. One of the few methods available at the present time is the use of intoxicating drugs. It was Kraepelin who first emphasized the importance of studying psychological changes produced by drugs. Following his lead many observers have tested their action on various psychic faculties. Copious data have been collected about such agents as alcohol, caffeine, hyoscine and cocaine. But the value of these observations in bringing about an understanding of the psycho-pathology of the major psychoses is limited, since it is rarely possible to produce the picture of a true psychosis without giving the drug in amounts sufficient to bring about dangerous or chronic intoxication.

Type
Part I.—Original Articles
Information
Journal of Mental Science , Volume 82 , Issue 338 , May 1936 , pp. 203 - 221
Copyright
Copyright © Royal College of Psychiatrists, 1936 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Beringer, K., Der Meskalinrausch, Berlin, 1927.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bensheim, H., “Typenunterscheide bei Meskalinversuchen”, Z. Neur., 1929, cxxi, p. 531.Google Scholar
Ellis, Havelock, “A Note on the Phenomena of Mescal-Intoxication”, Lancet, 1897, i, p. 1540.Google Scholar
Fernberger, S. F., “Further Observations in Peyote Intoxication”, Journ. Abnor. and Soc. Psychol., 1932, xxvi, p. 367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guirdham, A., “On the Value of the Rorschach Test”, Journ. Ment. Sci., 1935, lxxxi, p. 878.Google Scholar
Guttmann, E., and Maclay, W. S., “Mescalin and Depersonalization”, Journ. of Neur. and Psychopath., 1936, xvii 63, p. 193.Google Scholar
Kant, F., “Über Reaktionsformen im Giftrausch”, Arch. f. Psychiat., 1930, xci, p. 694.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knauer, A. W., and Maloney, , “A Preliminary Note on the Psychic Action of Mescalin, with Special Reference to the Mechanism of Visual Hallucination”, Journ. of Nerv, and Ment. Dis., 1913, xl, p. 425.Google Scholar
Lewin, L., Phantastica, Berlin, 1924 (English translation, London, 1931).Google Scholar
Lewis, A., and Hubert, , personal communication.Google Scholar
Lindemann, E., and Malamud, W., “Experimental Analysis of the Psychopathological Effects of Intoxicating Drugs”, Amer. Journ. Psychiat., 1933, xiii, p. 853.Google Scholar
Mayer-Gross, W., “Über Synæsthesien im Meskalinrausch”, Farbe-Ton-Forschungen, herausg. v. Georg. Anschütz, 1931, iii, Hamburg.Google Scholar
Mayer-Gross, W. and Stein, H., “Über einige Abänderungen der Sinnestätigkeit im Mescalinrausch”, Z. Neur., 1926, ci, p. 354.Google Scholar
Mayer-Gross, W., “Veränderte Sinnestätigkeit im Meskalinrausch”, D. Z. f. Nervenheilk., 1926, lxxxix, p. 112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitchell, S. Weir, “The Effects of Anhalonium Lewinii“, Brit. Med. Journ., 1896, ii.Google Scholar
Möller, Ag., “Einige Meskalinversuche”, Arch. Psychiatr. u. Neurol., 1935, x 405.Google Scholar
Prentiss, D. W., and Morgan, , Anhalonium Lewinii, Therapeut. Gaz., 1895, ix.Google Scholar
Quastel, J. H., and Wheatley, , Biochem. Journ., 1933, xxvii, p. 1609.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rouhier, A., “La plante qui fait les yeux émerveillés, le peyote”, Paris, 1927.Google Scholar
Slotta, K. H., and Szyszka, G., “Neue Darstellung von Mescalin”, Journ. f. prakt. Chemie, 1933, cxxxvii, p. 339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vernon, P. E., “The Significance of the Rorschach Test”, Brit. Journ. Med. Psychol., 1935, xv 3, p. 199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vernon, P. E., “Recent Work on the Rorschach Test”, Journ. Ment. Sci., 1935, lxxxi, p. 894.Google Scholar
Wertham, F., and Bleuler, M., “Experimental Study of the Influence of Mescalin on the Rorschach Test”, Arch. Neurol, and Psychiat., 1932, xxviii, p. 52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolf, H. G., and Curran, D., “Nature of Delirium and Allied States”, Arch. Neurol, and Psychiat., 1935, xxxiii, p. 1175.Google Scholar
Zador, J., “Meskalinwirkung bei Störung des optischen Systems”, Z. Neur., 1930, cxxvii, p. 108.Google Scholar
Zucker, K., “Versuche mit Meskalin an Halluzinanten”, Z. Neur., 1930, cxxvii, p. 108.Google Scholar
Zucker, K. and Zador, J., “Zur Analyse der Meskalin-Wirkung an Normalen”, Z. Neur., 1930, cxxvii, p. 15.Google Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.