Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T05:07:24.506Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Anatomical Comments on Psychosurgical Procedures

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 February 2018

E. Beck ,
T. McLardy  and
A. Meyer
E. Beck
Affiliation:
Department of Neuropathology, Maudsley Hospital, London
T. McLardy
Affiliation:
Department of Neuropathology, Maudsley Hospital, London
A. Meyer
Affiliation:
Department of Neuropathology, Maudsley Hospital, London
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

There has recently been a plethora of new methods of psychosurgery. This has, we believe, created considerable bewilderment in the minds both of the clinical psychiatrists who have to decide which of the methods to choose and of the neurosurgeons who have to practise them. The aim of the present paper is to clarify and disentangle the situation as far as this can be done from the anatomical angle.

Type
Part I.—Original Articles
Information
Journal of Mental Science , Volume 96 , Issue 402 , January 1950 , pp. 157 - 167
Copyright
Copyright © Royal College of Psychiatrists, 1950 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Dax, E. C., and Radley-Smith, E. J. (1948), Brit. J. Surg., 36, 74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feld, M., and Messimy, R. (1949), Presse med., 26, 358.Google Scholar
Freeman, W. (1948), Med. Ann. Dist. Columb., 17, 257.Google Scholar
Freeman, W. and Watts, J. W. (1942) Psychosurgery, Springfield.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heath, R. G., and Pool, J. L. (1948a), J. nerv. ment. Dis., 107, 411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heath, R. G., and Pool, J. L. (1948b), Psychosomat. Med., 10, 254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lashley, K. S., and Clark, G. (1946), J. Comp. Neurol., 85, 223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Le Beau, J. (1948), La Semaine Méd., 60, 1937.Google Scholar
Le Beau, J., Feld, M., and Bouvet, M. (1948a), Rev. Neurol., 80, 481.Google Scholar
Le Beau, J., Feld, M., and Bouvet, M. (1948b), La Semaine Méd., 60, 1942.Google Scholar
Lyerly, J. G. (1939), South. Surg., 8, 426.Google Scholar
McKissock, W. (1949), Brit. med. J., 2, 84.Google Scholar
McLardy, T., and Davies, D. L. (1949), J. Neurol., Neurosurg. Psychiat., 12, 231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McLardy, T., and Meyer, A. (1949), J. ment. Sci., 95, 182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meyer, A., and McLardy, T. (1948), J. ment. Sci., 94, 555.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meyer, A., and McLardy, T. (1949), J. ment. Sci., 95, 403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Penfield, W. (1948), Res. Pub. Ass. Res. nerv. ment. Dis., 27, 519.Google Scholar
Peyton, W. T., Noran, H. H., and Miller, E. W. (1948). Amer. J. Psychiat., 104, 513.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pool, J. L. (1949), Digest Neurol. Psychiat., 17, 432.Google Scholar
Poppen, J. L. (1948a), J. Neurosurg., 5, 514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poppen, J. L. (1948b), Digest Neurol. Psychiat., 16, 403.Google Scholar
Puech, P. (1949), Presse méd., 8, 115.Google Scholar
Rowland, L. P., and Mettler, F. A. (1948), J. comp. Neurol., 89, 21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scoville, W. B. (1949), Digest Neurol. Psychiat., 17, 431.Google Scholar
Spiegel, E. A., Wycis, H. T., Marks, M., and Lee, A. J. (1947), Science, 106, 349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, J. M. (1949), Digest Neurol. Psychiat., 17, 415.Google Scholar
Wycis, H., and Spiegel, E. A. (1949), Digest Neurol. Psychiat., 17, 435.Google Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.