Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T05:06:22.887Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

An Experimental Study of Schizophrenic Thought Disorder

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 February 2018

R. W. Payne ,
P. Mattussek  and
E. I. George
R. W. Payne
Affiliation:
Institute of Psychiatry, Maudsley Hospital, London, S.E.5
P. Mattussek
Affiliation:
Max Planck Institut fur Psychiatrie, Munich, Germany
E. I. George
Affiliation:
Psychology Department, University of Kerala, Trivandrum, Travancore, India
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

For many years, schizophrenic thought disorder has been regarded as being due to an abnormality of concept formation of some sort. However, there has not been general agreement about the nature of this abnormality. Kurt Goldstein and his followers (9, 32, 33) have argued that schizophrenics are abnormally “concrete”. That is to say, they are unable to perform inductive reasoning, since they are unable to make an abstract generalization. Norman Cameron (11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19) on the other hand argues that in one sense at least, schizophrenic concepts are over-generalized. He believes that the concepts formed by schizophrenics are “over-inclusive”. They are unable to maintain the normal conceptual boundaries, and incorporate into their concept elements (some of them personal) which are merely associated with the concept, but are not an essential part of it. This makes their thinking both over-general, and less precise than normal. A large number of studies have been carried out to test both these hypotheses.

Type
Original Articles
Information
Journal of Mental Science , Volume 105 , Issue 440 , July 1959 , pp. 627 - 652
Copyright
Copyright © Royal College of Psychiatrists, 1959 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Angyal, A., “Disturbances in thinking in schizophrenia’∗. In J. S. Kasanin (Ed.), Language and Thought in Schizophrenia, 1946. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
2. Babcock, , Harriet, , “An experiment in the measurement of mental deterioration”, Arch. Psychol., 1930, 18, No. 117.Google Scholar
3. Idem , Dementia Praecox a Psychological Study, 1933. The Science Press.Google Scholar
4. Idem , Time and the Mind, 1941. Cambridge, Mass.: Sci-Art Publishers.Google Scholar
5. Idem and Levy, , Lydia, , Manual of Directions for the Revised Examination of the Measurement of Efficiency of Mental Functioning, 1940. Chicago: Stoelting.Google Scholar
6. Becker, W. C., “A genetic approach to the interpretation and evaluation of the process-reactive distinction in schizophrenia”, J. abnorm. soc. Psychol., 1956, 53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Benjamin, J. D., “A method for distinguishing and evaluating formal thinking disorders in schizophrenia”. In J. S. Kasanin (Ed.), Language and Thought in Schizophrenia, 1946. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
8. Berg, , Esta, , “A simple objective technique for measuring flexibility in thinking”, J. gen. Psychol., 1948, 39, 15–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. Bolles, , Marjorie, and Goldstein, K., “A study of impairment of ‘abstract behaviour’ in schizophrenic patients”, Psychiat. Quart., 1938, 12, 42–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10. Bychowski, G., “Physiology of schizophrenic thinking”, J. nerv. ment. Dis., 1943, 98, 368–386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11. Cameron, N., “Reasoning, regression and communication in schizophrenics”, Psychol. Monogr., 1938, 50, No. 221, 1–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12. Idem , “A study of thinking in senile deterioration and schizophrenic disorganization”, Amer. J. Psychol., 1938, 51, 650–664.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13. Idem , “Deterioration and regression in schizophrenic thinking”, J. abnorm. soc. Psychol., 1939, 34, 265–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14. Idem , “Schizophrenic thinking in a problem-solving situation”, J. Ment. Sci., 1939, 85, 1012–1035.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15. Idem , “The Functional Psychoses.” In Hunt, J. McV. (Ed.), Personality and the Behaviour Disorders. Vol. II. 1944. New York: Ronald Press Co.Google Scholar
16. Idem , The Psychology of Behaviour Disorders, 1947. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
17. Idem and Magaret, , Ann, , “Experimental studies in thinking: I. Scattered speech in the responses of normal subjects to incomplete sentences”, J. exp. Psychol., 1949, 39, 617–627.Google Scholar
18. Iidem , “Correlates of scattered speech in the responses of normal subjects to incomplete sentences”, J. gen. Psychol., 1950, 43, 77–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19. Iidem, Behaviour Pathology, 1951. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
20. Campbell, D., A Study of Some Sensory-motor Functions in Psychiatric Patients. Unpublished Ph.D. Thesis, 1957. University of London Library.Google Scholar
21. Chapman, L. J., “Distractibility in the conceptual performance of schizophrenics”, J. abnorm. soc. Psychol., 1956, 53, 286–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
22. Idem and Taylor, Janet A., “Breadth of deviate concepts used by schizophrenics”, J. abnorm. soc. Psychol., 1957, 54, 118–123.Google Scholar
23. Daston, P. G., King, G. F., and Armitage, S. G., “Distortion in paranoid schizophrenia”, J. consult. Psychol., 1953, 17, 50–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
24. Epstein, S., “Overinclusive thinking in a schizophrenic and a control group”, J. consult. Psychol., 1953, 17, 384–388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
25. Eysenck, H. J., “Cortical inhibition, figural after-effect, and theory of personality”, J. abnorm. soc. Psychol., 1955, 51, 94–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
26. Feldman, M. J., and Drasgow, J., “A visual-verbal test for schizophrenia”, Psychiat. Quart. Suppl., 1951, part 1, 1–10.Google Scholar
27. Fey, Elizabeth T., “The performance of young schizophrenics and young normals on the Wisconsin card sorting test”, J. consult. Psychol., 1951, 15, 311–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
28. Fisher, S., “Patterns of personality rigidity and some of their determinants”, Psychol. Monogr., 1950, 64, No. 1, (whole No. 307).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
29. Flavell, J. H., “Abstract thinking and social behavior in schizophrenia”, J. abnorm. soc. Psychol., 1956, 52, 208–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
30. Furneaux, W. D., Manual of Nufferno Speed Tests, 1956. London: Nat. Foundation of Educational Research.Google Scholar
31. Idem , Manual of Nufferno Level Tests, 1956. London: Nat. Foundation of Educational Research.Google Scholar
32. Goldstein, K., “The significance of special mental tests for diagnosis and prognosis in schizophrenia”, Amer. J. Psychiat., 1939, 96, 575–578.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
33. Idem , “Methodological approach to the study of schizophrenia.” In: J. S. Kasanin (Ed.), Language and Thought in Schizophrenia, 1946. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
34. Idem and Scheerer, M., “Abstract and concrete behaviour, an experimental study with special tests”, Psychol. Monogr., 1941, 53, No. 2.Google Scholar
35. Gorham, D. R., “Use of the proverbs test for differentiating schizophrenics from normals”, J. consult. Psychol., 1956, 20, 435–440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
36. Grant, D. A., “Perceptual versus analytic responses to the number concept of a Weigl-type card sorting test”, J. exp. Psychol., 1951, 41, 23–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
37. Idem , Jones, O. R., and Tallantis, , Billie, , “The relative difficulty of the number, form and color concepts of a Weigl-type thinking and reasoning problem”, ibid., 1949, 39, 552–557.Google Scholar
38. Hanfmann, , Eugenia, and Kasanin, J., “A method for the study of concept formation”, J. Psychol., 1937, 3, 521–540.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
39. Iidem , “Conceptual thinking in schizophrenia”, Nerv. ment. dis. Monogr., 1942, 67.Google Scholar
40. Harris, A., and Metcalfe, , Maryse, , “Inappropriate affect”, J. Neurol. Neurosurg., and Psychiat., 1956, 19, 308–313.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
41. Heidbreder, , Edna, , “The attainment of concepts. I. Terminology and methodology”, J. gen. Psychol., 1946, 35, 173–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
42. Idem , “The attainment of concepts. II. The problem”, ibid., 1946, 35, 191–223.Google Scholar
43. Idem , “The attainment of concepts. III. The process”, J. Psychol., 1947, 24, 93–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
44. Idem , “The attainment of concepts. VI. Exploratory experiments on conceptualization at perceptual levels”, ibid., 1948, 26, 193–216.Google Scholar
45. Idem , “The attainment of concepts. VII. Conceptual achievements during card sorting”, ibid., 1949, 27, 3–39.Google Scholar
46. Idem , “The attainment of concepts. VIII. The conceptualization of verbally indicated instances”, ibid., 1949, 27, 263–309.Google Scholar
47. Idem , Bensley, Mary L., and Ivy, , Margaret, , “The attainment of concepts. IV. Regularities and levels”, ibid., 1948, 25, 299–329.Google Scholar
48. Idem and Overstreet, , Phoebe, , “The attainment of concepts. V. Critical features and contexts”, ibid., 1948, 26, 45–69.Google Scholar
49. Kasanin, J. S., “The disturbance of conceptual thinking in schizophrenia.” In: J. S. Kasanin (Ed.), Language and Thought in Schizophrenia, 1946. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
50. Idem and Hanfmann, , Eugenia, , “Disturbances in concept formation in schizophrenia”, Arch. Neurol. and Psychiat., 1938, 40, 1276–1282.Google Scholar
51. Iidem , “An experimental study of concept formation in schizophrenia”, Amer. J. Psychiat., 1938, 95, 35–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
52. Kessel, , Rose, , An Investigation into Some of the Factors Affecting Speed of Response in Psychiatric Patients with Special Reference to Distraction, 1955. Unpublished Ph.D. Thesis. University of London Library.Google Scholar
53. Klein, G. S., and Krech, D., “Cortical conductivity in the brain-injured”, J. Pers., 1952, 21, 118–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
54. Kugelmass, S., and Fondeur, M. R., “Zaslow's test of concept formation: reliability and validity”, J. consult. Psychol., 1955, 19, 227–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
55. Leiter, R. G., and Partington, J., Examination Manual for the Leiter-Partington Adult Scale, 1950. Psychological Service Center Press.Google Scholar
56. Lovibond, S. H., “The object sorting test and conceptual thinking in schizophrenia”, Austr. J. Psychol., 1954, 6, 52–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
57. Luchins, A. S., “Mechanization in problem solving: the effect of Einstellung”, Psychol. Monogr., 1942, 54, No. 6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
58. McGaughran, L. S., “Predicting language behaviour from object sorting”, J. abnorm. soc. Psychol., 1954, 49, 183–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
59. Idem , “Differences between schizophrenic and brain-damaged groups in conceptual aspects of object sorting”, ibid., 1957, 54, 44–49.Google Scholar
60. Idem and Moran, L. J., “ ‘Conceptual level’ vs. ‘conceptual area’ analysis of object-sorting behavior of schizophrenic and non-psychiatric groups”, ibid., 1956, 52, 43–50.Google Scholar
61. Moran, L. J., “Vocabulary knowledge and usage among normal and schizophrenic subjects”, Psychol. Monogr., 1953, 63, No. 20 (whole No. 370).Google Scholar
62. Ogilvie, B. C., A Study of Intellectual Slowness in Schizophrenia, 1954. Unpublished Ph.D. Thesis. University of London Library.Google Scholar
63. Pavlov, I. P., Conditioned Reflexes, 1927. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
64. Payne, R. W., An Investigation into the Possibility of Defining “Dissociation” as a Personality Trait by Means of Objective Tests, 1954. Unpublished Ph.D. Thesis. University of London Library.Google Scholar
65. Rapaport, D., Gill, M., and Schafer, R., Diagnostic Psychological Testing, 1945. Chicago: Year Book Publishers, Vol. I.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
66. Rashkis, H. A., “Three types of thinking disorder”, J. nerv. ment. Dis., 1947, 106, 650–670.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
67. Idem , Cushman, T. F., and Landis, C., “A new method for studying disorders of conceptual thinking”, J. abnorm. soc. Psychol., 1946, 41, 70–74.Google Scholar
68. Raven, J. C., The Mill Hill Vocabulary Scale, 1948. London: Lewis.Google Scholar
69. Rodnick, E. H., and Shakow, D., “Set in the schizophrenic as measured by a composite reaction time index”, Amer. J. Psychiat., 1940, 97, 214–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
70. Schilder, P., “On the development of thought.” In: Mayer-Gross, W., Slater, E., and Roth, M., Clinical Psychiatry, 1954. London: Cassell, p. 233.Google Scholar
71. Senf, , Rita, , Huston, P. E., and Cohen, B. D., “Thinking deficit in schizophrenia and changes with amytal”, J. abnorm. soc. Psychol., 1955, 50, No. 3, 383–387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
72. Shapiro, M. B., and Nelson, E. H., “An investigation of the nature of cognitive impairment in co-operative psychiatric patients”, Brit. J. Med. Psychol., 1955, 28, 239–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
73. Shneidman, E. S., “Schizophrenia and the MAPS test: a study of certain formal psychosocial aspects of fantasy production in schizophrenia as revealed by performance on the Make-a-Picture-Story (MAPS) test”, Genet. Psychol. Monogr., 1948, 38, 145–223.Google Scholar
74. Vigotsky, L. S., “Thought in schizophrenia”, Arch. neurol. Psychiat., 1934, 31, 1063–1077.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
75. Wechsler, D., The Measurement of Adult Intelligence, 1944. Baltimore: William and Williams Co.Google Scholar
76. Wegrocki, H., “Generalizing ability in schizophrenia: an inquiry into the disorders of problem thinking in schizophrenia”, Arch. Psychol., 1940, 36, No. 254.Google Scholar
77. White, Mary A., “A study of schizophrenic language”, J. abnorm. soc. Psychol., 1949, 44, 61–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
78. Zaslow, R. W., “A new approach to the problem of conceptual thinking in schizophrenia”, J. consult. Psychol., 1950, 14, 335–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.