Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-04T00:54:49.619Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Theoretical and Experimental of Tube Drawing With Floating Plug for Micro Heat-Pipes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 May 2011

C.-S. Wang  and
Y.-C. Wang
C.-S. Wang*
Affiliation:
College of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, National Taipei University of Technology, Taipei, Taiwan 10608, R.O.C.
Y.-C. Wang*
Affiliation:
College of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, National Taipei University of Technology, Taipei, Taiwan 10608, R.O.C.
*
*Associate Professor
**Ph.D. student
Get access

Abstract

This work presents a novel mathematical model, formed by modifying the conventional Slab Model, to predict the behaviors of tube drawing with a floating plug in the hollow copper tubes. FEM and experimentation are employed to verify the analytical solution. The model incorporates some parameters, including as die semi-angle, plug semi-angle, friction coefficient and wall thickness reduction ratio. The Self Lock Effect is simulated using FEM, and the effect is useful in estimating the critical drawing force. The results of this work reveal that the new model is more accurate than the conventional Slab Model especially at reduction ratios of up to 40%.

Keywords

Floating plugSlab modelSelf-lock effect.
Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Mechanics , Volume 24 , Issue 2 , June 2008 , pp. 111 - 117
Copyright
Copyright © The Society of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics, R.O.C. 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Swiatkowski, K. and Hatalak, R., “Study of the New Floating-Plug Drawing Process of Thin-Walled Tubes,” Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 151, pp. 105–114(2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.Karnezis, P. and Farrugia, D. C. J., “Study of Cold Tube Drawing by Finite-Element Modeling,” Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 80–81, pp. 690–694 (1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.Yeh, H. Y. and Cheng, J. H., “Forming Limits Prediction of the Sheet Metal Forming Process by the Energy- Based Damage Model,” Journal of Mechanics, 22, pp. 43–50 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.Sawamiphakdi, K., Lahoti, G. D. and Kropp, P. K., “Simulation of a Tube Drawing Process by the Finite Element Method,” Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 27, pp. 179–190 (1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5.Sandru, N. and Camenschi, G., “A Mathematical Model of the Theory of Tube Drawing with Floating Plug,” International Journal of Engineering Science, 26, pp. 569–585 (1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6.Rubio, E. M., Gonzalez, C., Marcos, M. and Sebastian, M. A., “Energetic Analysis of Tube Drawing Processes with Fixed Plug by Upper Bound Method,” Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 177, pp. 175–178 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7.Um, K. K. and Lec, D. N., “An Upper Bound Solution of Tube Drawing,” Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 63, pp. 43–48 (1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8.Neves, F. O., Button, S. T., Caminaga, C. and Gentile, F. C., “Numerical and Experimental Analysis of Tube Drawing with Fixed Plug,” Journal of the Brazilian Society of Mechanical Sciences and Engineering, 27, pp. 426–431(2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9.Rubio, E. M., “Analytical Methods Application to the Study of Tube Drawing Process with Fixed Conical Inner Plug: Slab and Upper Bound Methods,” Journal of Achievements in Materials and Manufacturing Engineering, 14, pp. 119–130 (2006).Google Scholar
10.Rabinowicz, E., Friction and Wear of Materials, 2nd Ed., John Wiley and Sons, pp. 112–120 (1995).Google Scholar