Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T06:10:21.987Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Numerical Study of Turbulent Flows Over Vibrating Blades with Positive Interblade Phase Angle

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 May 2011

S.-Y. Yang  and
K.-H. Chen
S.-Y. Yang*
Affiliation:
Department of Aeronautical Engineering, National Formosa University, Yunlin, Taiwan 63201, R.O.C.
K.-H. Chen*
Affiliation:
Department of Aeronautical Engineering, National Formosa University, Yunlin, Taiwan 63201, R.O.C.
*
*Professor
**Lecturer
Get access

Abstract

In this paper, a locally implicit scheme on unstructured dynamic meshes is presented to study transonic turbulent flows over vibrating blades with positive interblade phase angle. The unsteady Favre-averaged Navier-Stokes equations with moving domain effects and a low- Reynolds-number k-ε turbulence model are solved in the Cartesian coordinate system. To treat the viscous flux on quadrilateral-triangular meshes, the first-order derivatives of velocity components and temperature are calculated by constructing auxiliary cells and Green's theorem for surface integration is applied. The assessment of accuracy of the present scheme on quadrilateral-triangular meshes is conducted through the calculation of the turbulent flow around an NACA 0012 airfoil. Based on the comparison with the experimental data, the accuracy of the present approach is confirmed. From the distributions of magnitude of the first harmonic dynamic pressure difference coefficient which include the present solution and the related experimental and numerical results, it is found that the present solution approach is reliable and acceptable. The unsteady pressure wave, shock wave and vortex-shedding phenomena are demonstrated and discussed.

Keywords

TurbulentVibrating bladesInterblade phase angleLocally implicit
Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Mechanics , Volume 23 , Issue 2 , June 2007 , pp. 149 - 158
Copyright
Copyright © The Society of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics, R.O.C. 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Usab, W. J. Jr. and Verdon, J. M., “Advances in the Numerical Analysis of Linearized Unsteady Cascade Flows,” J. of Turbomachinery, 113(4), pp. 633–643 (1991).Google Scholar
2.Hall, K. C. and William, S. C., “Linearized Euler Predictions of Unsteady Aerodynamic Loads in Cascades,” AIAA Journal, 31(3), pp. 540–550 (1993).Google Scholar
3.Wolff, J. M. and Fleeter, S., “Single-Passage Euler Analysis of Oscillating Cascade Aerodynamics for Arbitrary Interblade Phase,” J. of Propulsion and Power, 10(5), pp. 690–697(1994).Google Scholar
4.Hwang, C. J. and Yang, S. Y., “Inviscid Analysis of Transonic Oscillating Cascade Flows Using a Dynamic Mesh Algorithm,” J. of propulsion and Power, 11(3), pp. 433–440(1995).Google Scholar
5.Ayer, T. C. and Verdon, J. M., “Validation of a Nonlinear Unsteady Aerodynamic Simulator for Vibrating Blade Rows,” J. of Turbomachinery, 120(1), pp. 112–121 (1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6.Abhari, R. S. and Giles, M., “A Navier-Stokes Analysis of Airfoils in Oscillating Transonic Cascades for the Prediction of Aerodynamic Damping,” J. of Turbomachinery, 119(1), pp. 77–84(1997).Google Scholar
7.Frey, K. K. and Fleeter, S., “Oscillating Airfoil Aerodynamics of a Rotating Compressor Blade Row,” J. of Propulsion and Power, 17(2), pp. 232–239 (2001).Google Scholar
8.Frey, K. K. and Fleeter, S., “Combined/Simultaneous Gust and Oscillating Compressor Blade Unsteady Aerodynamics,” J. of Propulsion and Power, 19(1), pp. 125–134(2003).Google Scholar
9.Yang, H. and He, L., “Experimental Study on Linear Compressor Cascade with Three-Dimensional Blade Oscillating,” J. of Propulsion and Power, 20(1), pp. 180–188(2004).Google Scholar
10.Mavriplis, D. J., “Viscous Flow Analysis Using a Parallel Unstructured Multigrid Solver,” AIAA Journal, 38(11), pp. 1243–1251(2000).Google Scholar
11.Yang, S. Y., “Remeshing Strategy of the Supersonic Flow over a Backward-Facing Step,” Journal of Mechanics, 18, pp. 127–138 (2002).Google Scholar
12.Yang, S. Y., “Refining Strategy of the Supersonic Turbulent Flow over a Backward-Facing Step,” Journal of Mechanics, 19, pp. 397–407 (2003).Google Scholar
13.Park, Y. M. and Kwon, O. J., “A Parallel Unstructured Dynamic Mesh Adaptation Algorithm for 3-D Unsteady Flows,” Int. J. for Numerical Methods in Fluids, 48(6), pp. 671–690(2005).Google Scholar
14.Yang, S. Y., “Adaptive Strategy of Transonic Flows over Vibrating Blades with Interblade Phase Angles,” Int. J. for Numerical Methods in Fluids, 42(8). pp. 885–908 (2003).Google Scholar
15.Reddy, K. C. and Jacock, J. L., “A Locally Implicit Scheme for the Euler Equations,” AIAA Paper, 87–1144 (1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16.Hwang, C. J. and Liu, J. L., “Inviscid and Viscous Solutions for Airfoil/Cascade Flows Using a Locally Implicit Algorithm on Adaptive Meshes,” J. of Turbomachinery, 113(4), pp. 553–560(1991).Google Scholar
17.Abe, K. and Kondoh, T., “A New Turbulence Model for Predicting Fluid Flow and Heat Transfer in Separating and Reattaching Flows-I. Flowfield Calculations,” Int. J. of Heat andMass Transfer, 37(1), pp. 139–151 (1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18.Nagano, Y. and Tagawa, M., “An Improved k-ε Model for Boundary Layer Flows,” J. of Fluids Engineering, 112(2), pp. 33–39 (1990).Google Scholar
19.Jameson, A., Schmidt, W. and Turkel, E., “Numerical Solutions of the Euler Equations by Finite Volume Methods Using Runge-Kutta Time-Stepping Schemes,” AIAA Paper, 81–1259 (1981).Google Scholar
20.Mavriplis, D. J., “Accurate Multigrid Solution of the Euler Equations on Unstructured and Adaptive Meshes,” AIAA Journal, 28(2), pp. 213–221 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
21.Yang, S. Y., “A Locally Implicit Scheme for Turbulent Flows on Dynamic Meshes,” Numerical Heat Transfer, Part B: Fundamentals, 46(6), pp. 581–601 (2004).Google Scholar
22.Giles, M. B., “Nonreflecting Boundary Conditions for Euler Equation Calculations,” AIAA Journal, 28(12), pp. 2050–2058 (1990).Google Scholar
23.Thomas, P. D. and Lombard, C. K., “Geometric Conservation Law and Its Application to Flow Computations on Moving Grids,” AIAA Journal, 17(10), pp. 1030–1037 (1979).Google Scholar
24.Marcel, V., “Analysis of Finite-Difference and Finite- Volume Formulations of Conservation Laws,” J. of Computational Physics, 81(1), pp. 1–52 (1989).Google Scholar
25.Thibert, J. J., Granjacques, M. and Ohman, L. H., “NACA0012 Airfoil AGARD Advisory Report No. 138,” Experimental Data Base for Computer Program Assessment, pp. A1–9 (1979).Google Scholar
26.Buffum, D. H. and Fleeter, S., “The Aerodynamics of an Oscillating Cascade in a Compressible Flowfield,” J. of Turbomachinery, 112(4), pp. 759–767 (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar