Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T21:55:14.815Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Numerical Study of Conventional and Biomimetic Marine Current Turbines in Tandem by Using Openfoam®

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 June 2017

Y. J. Chu  and
W. T. Chong
Y. J. Chu
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical EngineeringFaculty of EngineeringUniversity of MalayaKuala Lumpur, Malaysia
W. T. Chong*
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical EngineeringFaculty of EngineeringUniversity of MalayaKuala Lumpur, Malaysia
*
*Corresponding author ([email protected])
Get access

Abstract

The increasing demands on renewable energy nowadays caused the development of marine current turbine industry. In order to improve the current design of marine current turbines, studies were conducted to analyse their hydrodynamic performances during operation. Since most of the time marine current turbines operate in arrays, it is important to understand the interactions between the turbines in order to design the optimum turbine farm. OpenFOAM® was used to simulate the turbine interactions of conventional and biomimetic marine current turbines in tandem configuration. The conventional marine current turbines were referred to Pinon et al. (2012) and Mycek et al. (2013) while the biomimetic marine current turbine was adopted from Chu (2016). The numerical simulations were conducted with turbines in different inter-device distances, A/D. The percentage differences of ‘‘efficiency’’, η between the IFREMER-LOMC and the biomimetic turbine case of inter-device distances, A/D = 4, 6, 8 and 10 are 14.3%, 6.4%, 3% and 1.92% respectively. The results show that the power produced by the biomimetic turbines in tandem is comparable with the IFREMER-LOMC turbines when A/D > 4. The biomimetic marine current turbines can be a fair choice due to their potential to have alternative fabrication method of their sheet-like turbine blades.

Keywords

BiomimeticDryobalanops aromaticaMarine current turbineCFD
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Mechanics , Volume 34 , Issue 5 , October 2018 , pp. 679 - 693
Copyright
Copyright © The Society of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Maître, T., Amet, E. and Pellone, C., “Modeling of the Flow in A Darrieus Water Turbine: Wall Grid Refinement Analysis and Comparison with Experiments,” Renewable Energy, 51, pp. 497–512 (2013).Google Scholar
2. Gaurier, B., Davies, P., Deuff, A. and Germain, G., “Flume Tank Characterization of Marine Current Turbine Blade Behaviour under Current and Wave Loading,” Renewable Energy, 59, pp. 1–12 (2013).Google Scholar
3. Bahaj, A. S., Molland, A. F., Chaplin, J. R. and Batten, W. M. J., “Power and Thrust Measurements of Marine Current Turbines under Various Hydrodynamic Flow Conditions in A Cavitation Tunnel and A Towing Tank,” Renewable Energy, 32, pp. 407–426 (2007).Google Scholar
4. Bahaj, A. S., Batten, W. M. J. and McCann, G., “Experimental Verifications of Numerical Predictions for the Hydrodynamic Performance of Horizontal Axis Marine Current Turbines,” Renewable Energy, 32, pp. 2479–2490 (2007).Google Scholar
5. Luznik, L., Flack, K. A., Lust, E. E. and Taylor, K., “The Effect of Surface Waves on the Performance Characteristics of a Model Tidal Turbine,” Renewable Energy, 58, pp. 108–114 (2013).Google Scholar
6. Pinon, G., Mycek, P., Germain, G. and Rivoalen, E., “Numerical Simulation of the Wake of Marine Current Turbines with A Particle Method,” Renewable Energy, 46, pp. 111–126 (2012).Google Scholar
7. Mason-Jones, A., O’Doherty, D. M., Morris, C. E. and O’Doherty, T., “Influence of a Velocity Profile & Support Structure on Tidal Stream Turbine Performance,” Renewable Energy, 52, pp. 23–30 (2013).Google Scholar
8. Zhang, X., Wang, S., Wang, F., Zhang, L. and Sheng, Q., “The Hydrodynamic Characteristics of Free Variable-Pitch Vertical Axis Tidal Turbine,” Journal of Hydrodynamics, 25, pp. 834–839 (2012).Google Scholar
9. Malki, R., Masters, I., Williams, A. J. and Croft, T. N., “Planning Tidal Stream Turbine Array Layouts Using a Coupled Blade Element Momentum - Computational Fluid Dynamics Model,” Renewable Energy, 63, pp. 46–54 (2014).Google Scholar
10. Bai, G., Li, J., Fan, P. and Li, G., “Numerical Investigations of the Effects of Different Arrays on Power Extractions of Horizontal Axis Tidal Current Turbines,” Renewable Energy, 53, pp. 180–186 (2013).Google Scholar
11. Mycek, P., Gaurier, B., Germain, G., Pinon, G. and Rivoalen, E., “Numerical and Experimental Study of the Interaction between Two Marine Current Turbines,” International Journal of Marine Energy, 1, pp. 70–83 (2013).Google Scholar
12. Chu, Y.-J., “A New Biomimicry Marine Current Turbine: Study of Hydrodynamic Performance and Wake Using Software OpenFOAM*,” Journal of Hydrodynamics, 28, pp. 125–141 (2016).Google Scholar
13. GetData Graph Digitizer, GetData http://getdata-graph-digitizer.com/ (2015).Google Scholar
14. Hepperle, M., JavaFoil - Analysis of Airfoils, http://www.mh-aerotools.de/airfoils/javafoil.htm/ (2015).Google Scholar
15. SALOME – The Open Source Integration Platform for Numerical Simulation, Open CASCADE, http://www.salome-platform.org/ (2015).Google Scholar
16. OpenFOAM – The Open Source CFD Toolbox, OpenCFD Ltd (ESI Group), http://www.openfoam.com/ (2015).Google Scholar
17. ParaView, Kitware, http://www.paraview.org/ (2015).Google Scholar
18. Standard Solvers, OpenCFD Ltd, http://www.openfoam.com/features/standard-solvers.php/ (2015).Google Scholar
19. Standard Libraries, OpenCFD Ltd, http://www.openfoam.org/docs/user/standard-libraries.php#x15-91001r7/ (2015).Google Scholar
20. Kolekar, N. and Banerjee, A., “Performance Characterization and Placement of a Marine Hhydrokinetic Turbine in a Tidal Channel under Boundary Proximity and Blockage Effects,” Applied Energy, 148, pp. 121–133 (2015).Google Scholar
21. Wilcox, D. C., Turbulence Modeling for CFD, Griffin Printing, Glendale (1993).Google Scholar
22. McGraw-Hill Dictionary of Scientific & Technical Terms, 6E, The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., http://encyclopedia2.thefreedictionary.com/Reynolds+stress (2017).Google Scholar