Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T00:28:20.075Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Investigation of Tunnel Stress Path During Face Advancement

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 May 2011

C.-N. Chen  and
W.-Y. Huang
C.-N. Chen*
Affiliation:
Department of Construction Engineering, National Taiwan University of Science & Technology, Taipei, Taiwan 10607, R.O.C.
W.-Y. Huang*
Affiliation:
Department of Construction Engineering, National Taiwan University of Science & Technology, Taipei, Taiwan 10607, R.O.C.
*
*Associate Professor
**Ph.D. student
Get access

Abstract

Tunnel stress path during excavation was investigated in the study scope. The triple-center section is commonly designated for highway tunnels, but the analytical solution of the stress state for a non-circular tunnel section with multiple bench excavations is difficult to obtain. Our investigation provides an algorithmic procedure which reliably evaluates stress adjustment of a bench excavation with respect to the three-dimensional state of stress. Evaluation of a safety factor at the tunnel face during advancement is performed following the stress path and principal stress space.

Keywords

Bench cut tunnelingRoundStress path methodPrincipal stress space.
Type
Technical Note
Information
Journal of Mechanics , Volume 23 , Issue 4 , December 2007 , pp. 451 - 458
Copyright
Copyright © The Society of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics, R.O.C. 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Kirsch, G., “Die Theorie der Elastizitat und Die Budurfnisse der Festigkeitslehre,” Veit. Ver. Deut. Ing., 42(28), pp. 797–807 (1898).Google Scholar
2.Széchy, Károly, The Art of Tunneling, Akadémiai kiadó, Budapest, pp. 176–181 (1973).Google Scholar
3.Brady, B. H. G. and Brown, E. T., Rock Mechanics for Underground Mining, Chapman & Hall, London, pp. 288–293 (1985).Google Scholar
4.Brown, E. T., Bray, J. W., Ladanyi, B. and Hoek, E., “Ground Response Curves for Rock Tunnels,” Journal of the Geotechnical Engineering, ASCE, 109(1), pp. 15–39 (1983).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5.Brady, B. H. G. and Brown, E. T., Rock Mechanics for Underground Mining, Chapman & Hall, London, pp. 204–208 (1985).Google Scholar
6.Ellis, H. L., Feldman, A. I. and Buechel, G. J., “Numerical Analysis of the Bosten Red Line Tunnel, FLAC and Numerical Modeling in Geomechanics,” Proc. of the Int. FLAC Symp. In Geomechanics, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA, pp. 323–328 (1999).Google Scholar
7.Itasca Consulting Group, Inc., Fast Lagrangian Analysis of Continua in 3 Dimensions, User's Manual, Version 2.1, Minneapolis, Minnesota, U.S.A. (2002).Google Scholar
8.Hon, C. J., “Three-dimensional Numerical Analysis for Ground Reaction Curve and Fracture Zone During Tunnel Excavation,” Master Thesis, Dep. of Construction Engineering, Nation Taiwan University of Science and Technology, Taipei, Taiwan (1995).Google Scholar
9.Hoek, E., and Brown, E. T., “Practical Estimates of Rock Mass Strength,” Int. J. Rock Mech. Min. Sci. & Geomech. Abster., 34, pp. 1165–1186 (1997).Google Scholar
10.Hoek, E., “Rock Engineering,” Course Note for Rock Engineering in the Department of Civil Engineering at the University of Toronto, pp. 179–181 (1989).Google Scholar
11.Lambe, T. W., “Methods of Estimating Settlement, Journal of the Soil Mechanics and Foundations Division,” ASCE, 90 SM5, pp. 47–74 (1964).Google Scholar
12.Chen, W. F. and Han, D. J., Plasiticity for Structural Engineers, Springer-Verlag New York Inc. (1988).Google Scholar