Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T13:21:25.781Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Efficacy of Drilling Degrees of Freedom in the Finite Element Modeling of P-and SV-Wave Scattering Problems

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 May 2011

Jaehwan Kim ,
Vasundara V. Varadan  and
Vijay K. Varadan
Jaehwan Kim*
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Inha University 253 Yonghyun-Dong, Nam-Ku, Incheon 402-751, Korea
Vasundara V. Varadan*
Affiliation:
Department of Engineering Science & Mechanics, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802, U.S.A.
Vijay K. Varadan*
Affiliation:
Department of Engineering Science & Mechanics, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802, U.S.A.
*
*Professor
*Professor
*Professor
Get access

Abstract

This paper deals with a hybrid finite element method for wave scattering problems in infinite domains. Scattering of waves involving complex geometries, in conjunction with infinite domains is modeled by introducing a mathematical boundary within which a finite element representation is employed. On the mathematical boundary, the finite element representation is matched with a known analytical solution in the infinite domain in terms of fields and their derivatives. The derivative continuity is implemented by using a slope constraint. Drilling degrees of freedom at each node of the finite element model are introduced to make the numerical model more sensitive to the transverse component of the elastodynamic field. To verify the effects of drilling degrees freedom and slope constraints individually, reflection of normally incident P and SV waves on a traction free half space is considered. For P-wave incidence, the results indicate that the use of a slope constraint is more effective because it suppresses artificial reflection at the mathematical boundary. For the SV-wave case, the use of drilling degrees of freedom is effective in reducing numerical error at the irregular frequencies.

Keywords

Finite element modeling of infinite domainsNonabsorbing boundary conditiondrilling degrees of freedomWave scattering problems
Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Mechanics , Volume 16 , Issue 2 , June 2000 , pp. 103 - 108
Copyright
Copyright © The Society of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics, R.O.C. 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1Brebbia, C. A., The Boundary Element Method for Engineers, Wiley, New York (1980).Google Scholar
2Wilton, D. T., “Acoustic Radiation and Scattering from Elastic Structures,” Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng., 13, pp. 123–138 (1978).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3Schenck, H. A., “Improved Integral Formulation for Acoustic Radiation Problems,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 44, pp. 41–58 (1968).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4Burton, A. J. and Miller, G. F., “The Application of Integral Equation Methods to the Numerical Solution of Some Exterior Boundary Value Problems,” Proc. R. Soc., London, Ser. A 323, pp. 201–210 (1971).Google Scholar
5Liapis, S., “Method for Suppressing the Irregular Frequencies from Integral Equations in Water-Structure Interaction Problems,” Comput. Mech., 12, pp. 59–68 (1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6Bettess, P., “Infinite Elements,” Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng., 11, pp. 53–64 (1977).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7Hunt, J. T., Knittel, M. R., Nichols, C. S. and Barach, D., “Finite-Element Approach to Acoustic Scattering from Elastic Structures,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am., 57(2), pp. 287–299 (1975).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8Su, J. H., Varadan, V. V. and Varadan, V. K., “Finite Element Eigenfunction Method (FFEM) for Elastic Wave Scattering by Arbitrary Three-Dimensional Axisymmetric Scatterers,” J. Appl. Mech., ASME, 51, pp. 1–8 (1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9Fix, G. J. and Marin, S. P., “Variational Methods for Underwater Acoustic Problems,” J. Comput. Phys., 28, pp. 253–270 (1978).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10Engquist, B. and Majda, A., “Radiation Boundary Conditions for Acoustic and Elastic Wave Calculations,” Comm. Pure Appl. Math., 32, pp. 313–357 (1979).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11Bayliss, A. and Turkel, Eli, “Radiation Boundary Conditions for Wave-Like Equations,” Comm, Pure Appl. Math., 33, pp. 707–725 (1980).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12Givoli, D. and Keller, J. B., “Non-Reflecting Boundary Conditions for Elastic Waves,” Wave Motion, 12, pp. 261–279 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13Harari, I. and Hughes, T. J., “Analysis of Continuous Formulations Underlying the Computation of Time-Harmonic Acoustics in Exterior Domains,” Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng., 97, pp. 103–124 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14Jiang, L. and Rogers, R. J., “Effects of Spatial Discretization on Dispersion and Spurious Oscillations in Elastic Wave Propagation,” Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng., 29, pp. 1205–1218 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15Bossavit, A. and Mayergoyz, I., “Edge-Elements for Scattering Problems,” IEEE Trans. Magnetics, 25(4), pp. 2816–2821 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16Kim, J., Varadan, V. V. and Varadan, V. K., “Finite Element Modeling of Scattering Problems Involving Infinite Domains Using Drilling Degrees of Freedom,” Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng., 134, pp. 57–70 (1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar