Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T04:39:51.388Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Analysis of Newmark Explicit Integration Method for Nonlinear Systems

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 May 2011

S.-Y. Chang ,
Y.-C. Huang  and
C.-H. Wang
S.-Y. Chang*
Affiliation:
Department of Civil Engineering, National Taipei University of Technology, Taipei, Taiwan 10608, R.O.C.
Y.-C. Huang*
Affiliation:
Department of Construction Management, Hwa Hsia Institute of Technology, Taipei, Taiwan 23568, R.O.C.
C.-H. Wang*
Affiliation:
CSIRO Division of Sustainable Ecosystems, 37 Graham Road, Highett, Victoria 3190, Australia
*
*Professor
**Associate Professor
***Research Scientist
Get access

Abstract

Numerical properties of the Newmark explicit method in the solution of nonlinear systems are explored. It is found that the upper stability limit is no longer equal to 2 for the Newmark explicit method for nonlinear systems. In fact, it is enlarged for stiffness softening and is reduced for stiffness hardening. Furthermore, its relative period error increases with the increase of the step degree of nonlinearity for a given value of the product of the natural frequency and the time step. It is also verified that the viscous damping determined from an initial stiffness is effective to reduce displacement response in the solution of a nonlinear system as that for solving a linear elastic system. All the theoretical results are confirmed with numerical examples.

Keywords

Step degree of nonlinearityStabilityAccuracy
Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Mechanics , Volume 22 , Issue 4 , December 2006 , pp. 321 - 329
Copyright
Copyright © The Society of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics, R.O.C. 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Bathe, K. J., Finite Element Procedures in Engineering Analysis, Prentice-Hall, Inc. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey (1996).Google Scholar
2.Bathe, K. J. and Wilson, E. L., “Stability and Accuracy Analysis of Direct Integration Methods,” Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 1, pp. 283–291 (1973).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.Belytschko, T. and Hughes, T. J. R., Computational Methods for Transient Analysis, Elsevier Science Publishers B.V., North-Holland (1983).Google Scholar
4.Burden, R. L. and Faires, J. D., Numerical Analysis, PWS-KENT Publishing Company, Boston (1989).Google Scholar
5.Chang, S. Y., “A Series of Energy Conserving Algorithms for Structural Dynamics,” Journal of the Chinese Institute of Engineers, 19(2), pp. 219–230 (1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6.Chang, S. Y., “Improved Numerical Dissipation for Explicit Methods in Pseudodynamic Tests,” Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 26, pp. 917–929 (1997).3.0.CO;2-9>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7.Chang, S. Y., “Explicit Pseudodynamic Algorithm with Unconditional Stability,” Journal of Engineering Mechanics, ASCE, 128(9), pp. 935–947 (2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8.Chang, S. Y. and Liao, W. I., “An Unconditionally Stable Explicit Method for Structural Dynamics,” Journal of Earthquake Engineering, 9(3), pp. 349–370 (2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9.Chang, S. Y., “A Family of Explicit Dissipative Algorithms for Pseudodynamic Testing,” Journal of Mechanics, 22, pp. 145–154(2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10.Hilber, H. M., Hughes, T. J. R. and Taylor, R. L., “Improved Numerical Dissipation for Time Integration Algorithms in Structural Dynamics,” Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 5, pp. 283–292 (1977).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11.Hughes, T. J. R., The Finite Element Method, Prentice- Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, N.J., 1987.Google Scholar
12.Newmark, N. M., “A Method of Computation for Structural Dynamics,” Journal of Engineering Mechanics Division ASCE, 85, pp. 67–94 (1959).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13.Park, K. C., “An Improved Stiffly Stable Method for Direct Integration of Nonlinear Structural Dynamic Equations,” Journal of Applied Mechanics, 42, pp. 464–470 (1975).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14.Ting, T. C. T., “The Stationary Values of Young's Modulus for Monoclinic and Triclinic Materials,” Journal of Mechanics, 21, pp. 249–253 (2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar