Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T08:13:00.962Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Adaptive Trajectory Control and Dynamic Friction Compensation for a Flexible-Link Robot

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 May 2011

Vahid Erfanian*
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Amirkabir University of Technology, 424 Hafez Ave., Tehran, Iran
Mansour Kabganian*
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Amirkabir University of Technology, 424 Hafez Ave., Tehran, Iran
*
* Ph.D., corresponding author
** Professor
Get access

Abstract

Friction compensation techniques are studied for control of a flexible-link robot based on the LuGre friction model. To overcome the problem of uncertain parameters in the friction model, adaptive control schemes are used for two different types of parametric uncertainties. A novel dual-observer technique is proposed to estimate the internal state inside the friction model. A distributed-parameter dynamic model is used for the flexible arm to design the controllers. The Lyapunov stability theorem is used to guarantee the global asymptotic stability of the controllers. The performance of position tracking and link vibration attenuation is verified through experimental results. The results also confirm the effectiveness of the proposed friction compensation schemes.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © The Society of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics, R.O.C. 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Olsson, H. and Åström, J. K., “Friction Generated Limit Cycles,” IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology, 9, pp. 629636 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.Lee, H. H., “A New Trajectory Control of a Flexible link Robot Based on a Distributed-Parameter Dynamic Model,” International Journal of Control, 77, pp. 546553 (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.Tso, S. K., Yang, T .W., Xu, W. L. and Sunb, Z. Q., “Vibration Control for a Flexible link Robot Arm with Deflection Feedback,” International Journal of Non-Linear Mechanics, 38, pp. 5162 (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.Zhang, X., Xu, W., Nair, S. S. and Chellaboina, V., “PDE Modeling and Control of a Flexible Two-Link Manipulator,” IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology, 13, pp. 301312 (2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5.Lee, H. H. and Prevost, J., “A Coupled Sliding-SurfaceApproach for the Trajectory Control of a Flexible link Robot Based on a Distributed Dynamic Model,” International Journal of Control, 78, pp. 629637 (2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6.Lee, H. H. and Liang, Y., “A Coupled-Sliding-Surface Approach for the Robust Trajectory Control of a Horizontal Two-Link Rigid-Flexible Robot,” International Journal of Control, 80, pp. 18801892 (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7.Erfanian, V. and Kabganian, M., “Adaptive Trajectory Control and Friction Compensation of a Flexible-link Robot,” Scientific Research and Essays, 4, pp. 239248 (2009).Google Scholar
8.Canudas de, Wit, Olsson, C. H., Åstrom, K. J. and Lischinsky, P., “A New Model for Control of Systems with Friction,” IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 40, pp. 419425 (1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9.Canudas de Wit, C. and Ge, S. S., “Adaptive Friction Compensation for Systems with Generalized Velocity/Position Friction Dependency,” Proceedings of the 36th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control1999.Google Scholar
10.Xie, W. F., “Sliding-Mode-Observer-Based Adaptive Control for Servo Actuator with Friction,” IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 54, pp. 15171527(2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11.Canudas de Wit, C. and Lischinsky, P., “Adaptive Friction Compensation with Partially Known Dynamic Friction Model,” International Journal of Adaptive Control and Signal Processing, 11, pp. 6580 (1997).3.0.CO;2-3>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12.Tan, Y. and Kanellakopoulos, I., “Adaptive Nonlinear Friction Compensation with Parametric Uncertainties,” Proceedings of American Control Conference1999.Google Scholar
13.Zhu, Y. and Pagilla, P., “Static and Dynamic Friction Compensation in Trajectory Control of Robots,” Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation2002.Google Scholar
14.Xu, L. and Yao, B., “Adaptive Robust Control of Mechanical Systems with Non-linear Dynamic Friction Compensation,” International Journal of Control, 81, pp. 167176 (2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15.Chalhoub, N. G. and Kfoury, G. A., “Development of a Robust Nonlinear Observer for a Single-Link Flexible Manipulator,” Nonlinear Dynamics, 39, pp. 217233 (2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16.Knani, J., “Dynamic Modelling of Flexible Robotic Mechanisms and Adaptive Robust Control of Trajectory Computer Simulation–Part I,” Applied Mathematical Modelling, 26, pp. 11131124 (2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17.Moallem, M., Patel, R. V. and Khorasani, K., “Nonlinear Tip-Position Tracking Control of a Flexible link Manipulator: Theory and Experiments,” Automatica, 37, pp. 18251834(2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18.de Queiroz, M. S., Dawson, D. M., Agarwal, M. and Zhang, F., “Adaptive Nonlinear Boundary Control of a Flexible Link Robot Arm,” IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation, 15, pp. 779787 (1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19.Slotine, J. J. E. and Li, W. P., Applied Nonlinear Control, Prentice-Hall, New Jersey, pp. 124125 (1991).Google Scholar