Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T05:17:15.910Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Two-Dimensional FE Simulation of Impact Loading on Alumina Matrix Nanocomposite Reinforced by Dyneema® HB25 Laminates

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 April 2016

M. Alebooyeh ,
H. R. Baharvandi  and
C. Aghanajafi
M. Alebooyeh
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical EngineeringScience and Research BranchIslamic Azad UniversityTehran, Iran
H. R. Baharvandi*
Affiliation:
Composite Research CenterFaculty of Materials and Manufacturing ProcessesMalek-Ashtar University of TechnologyTehran, Iran
C. Aghanajafi
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical EngineeringK. N. Toosi University of TechnologyTehran, Iran
*
*Corresponding author ([email protected])
Get access

Abstract

Perforation process of a novel ceramic/composite panel including alumina-silicon carbide (Al2O3-SiC) nanocomposite as the front plate and ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene laminated composite (Dyneema® HB25) as the back-up impacted by a tip tapered penetrator has been analyzed based on LS-Dyna and HyperMesh codes. In order to balance the competing requirements posed by thickness, weight, cost and performance, a finite element (FE) simulation has been developed with well-developed material models. A two-dimensional, dynamic-explicit and Lagrangian model has been considered. The perforation process has been investigated for three different thicknesses of the ceramic plate. The Johnson-Cook, Johnson-Holmquist and Orthotropic-Elastic material models have been used for the penetrator, ceramic, and composite, respectively. The FE results, which have a good agreement with available experimental data, show that with the increase in the ceramic thickness, ceramic's fracture conoid as well as elasto-plastic deformation of fibers increase while fiber breakage and dishing of the composite layers diminish. In addition to saving cost and time, the FE simulation results can be useful as a fairly accurate prediction tool for the designing of lightweight body protective panels with desired impact resistance performance and eligible blunt trauma of the back-up.

Keywords

Composite laminatesImpact behaviorFinite element analysisCeramic-composite panel
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Mechanics , Volume 33 , Issue 1 , February 2017 , pp. 1 - 11
Copyright
Copyright © The Society of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Liaghat, G. H. and Feli, S., “Analysis of Penetration Process in the Ceramic/Metal Targets,” Proceedings of 8th Annual Conference of Mechanic of Iran, Iran (2001).Google Scholar
2. Nishioka, T., New Developments in Advanced Ceramics for the 90’s, Toray Research center Inc., Tokyo, pp. 121–124 (1992).Google Scholar
3. Karandikar, P. G., Evans, G., Wong, S. and Aghajanian, M. K., “A Review of Ceramics for Armour Applications,” 32th International Conference on Advanced Ceramics and Composites, USA (2008).Google Scholar
4. Mishra, R. S. and Mukherjee, A. K., “Processing of High Hardness-High Toughness Alumina Matrix Nanocomposites,” Materials Science and Engineering A, 301, pp. 97–101 (2001).Google Scholar
5. Greskovich, C. A. and Brewer, J., “Solubility of Magnesia in Polycrystalline Alumina at High Temperatures,” Journal of the American Ceramic Society, 84, pp. 420–425 (2004).Google Scholar
6. Awaji, H., Choi, S. M. and Yagi, E., “Mechanisms of Toughening and Strengthening in Ceramic-Based Nanocomposites,” Mechanics of Materials, 34, pp. 411–422 (2002).Google Scholar
7. Guan, Z. W., Cantwell, W. J. and Abdullah, R., “Numerical Modeling of the Impact Response of Fiber-Metal Laminates,” Polymer Composites, 30, pp. 603–611 (2009).Google Scholar
8. Zaera, R. and Galvez, V. S., “Analytical Modeling of Normal and Oblique Ballistic Impact on Ceramic/Metal Lightweight Armours,” International Journal of Impact Engineering, 21, pp. 133–148 (1998).Google Scholar
9. Azarafza, R., Arab, A., Mehdipoor, A. and Davar, A., “Impact Behavior of Ceramic-Metal Armour by Al2O3-Nano SiC Nano Composite,” International Journal of Advanced Design and Manufacturing Technology, 5, pp. 83–87 (2012).Google Scholar
10. Chelluru, S. K., “Finite Element Simulation of Ballistic Impact on Metal and Composite Plates,” M. S. Thesis, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Wichita State University, Wichita, U.S.A (2007).Google Scholar
11. Naik, N. K., Kumar, S., Ratnaveer, D., Joshi, M. and Akella, K., “An Energy-Based Model for Ballistic Impact Analysis of Ceramic-Composite Armors,” Journal of Damage Mechanics, 22, pp. 145–187 (2013).Google Scholar
12. Naebe, M., Sandlin, J., Crouch, I. and Fox, B., “Novel Polymer-Ceramic Composites for Protection Against Ballistic Fragments, Polymer Composites,” Polymer Composites, 34, pp. 180–186 (2013).Google Scholar
13. Tasdemirci, G. T. and Güden, M., “The Effect of the Interlayer on the Ballistic Performance of Ceramic/Composite Armors: Experimental and Numerical Study,” International Journal of Impact Engineering, 44, pp. 1–9 (2012).Google Scholar
14. Bürger, D., Faria, A. R., Almeida, S. F. M., Melo, F. C. L. and Donadon, M. V., “Ballistic Impact Simulation of an Armour-Piercing Projectile on Hybrid Ceramic/Fiber Reinforced Composite Armours,” International Journal of Impact Engineering, 43, pp. 63–77 (2012).Google Scholar
15. Jang, J., Park, R., Yun, Y., Park, J. and Kim, H., “Failure of Ceramic/Fiber-Reinforced Plastic Composites Under Hypervelocity Impact Loading,” Journal of Materials Sciences, 32, pp. 23–33 (1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16. Fawaz, Z., Zheng, W. and Behdinan, K., “Numerical Simulation of Normal and Oblique Ballistic Impact on Ceramic Composite Aumours,” Composite Structures, 63, pp.387–395 (2004).Google Scholar
17. Chocron, I. S. B. and Galvez, V. S., “A New Analytical Model to Simulate Impact Onto Ceramic/Composite Armours,” International Journal of Impact Engineering, 21, pp. 461–471 (1988).Google Scholar
18. Shokrieh, M. M. and Javadpour, G. H., “Penetration Analysis of a Projectile in Ceramic Composite Armour,” Composite Structures, 82, pp. 269–276 (2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19. Feli, S., Yas, M. H. and Asgari, M. R., “An Analytical Model for Perforation of Ceramic/Multi-Layered Planar Woven Fabric Targets by Blunt Projectiles,” Composite Structures, 93, pp. 548–556 (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
20. Krishnan, K., Sockalingam, S., Bansal, S. and Rajan, S. D., “Numerical Simulation of Ceramic Composite Armour Subjected to Ballistic Impact,” Composites: Part B, 41, pp. 583–593 (2010).Google Scholar
21. Feli, S. and Asgari, M. R., “Finite Element Simulation of Ceramic/Composite Armour Under Ballistic Impact,” Composites: Part B, 42, pp. 771–780 (2011).Google Scholar
22. Asadi, A., “Experimental Analysis of Penetration Into Ceramic-Composite Targets Under High Velocity Impact Loads,” Ph.D. Dissertation, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Amirkabir University of Technology, Tehran, Iran (2011).Google Scholar
23. Bogetti, T. A., “Finite Element Modeling of Transverse Impact on a Ballistic Fabric,” International Journal of Mechanical Sciences, 48, pp. 33–43 (2006).Google Scholar
24. Sabouri, H., Liaghat, G. H. and Ahmadi, H., “Ballistic Impact Perforation into GLARE Targets, Part I: Numerical Modeling and Experiments,” Proceedings of CCFA-2, Iran (2010).Google Scholar
25. Hetherington, J. G., “The Optimization of Two-Component Composite Armours,” International Journal of Impact Engineering, 12, pp. 229–259 (1992).Google Scholar
26. Tran, P., Ngo, T., Yang, E. C., Mendis, P. and Humphries, W., “Effects of Architecture on Ballistic Resistance of Textile Fabrics: Numerical Study,” International Journal of Damage Mechanics, 23, pp. 359–376 (2014).Google Scholar
27. Pandya, K. S., Kumar, C. h. V. S., Nair, N. S., Patil, P. S. and Naik, N. K., “Analytical and Experimental Studies on Ballistic Impact Behavior of 2D Woven Fabric Composites,” International Journal of Damage Mechanics, 24, pp. 471–511 (2015).Google Scholar
28. Nayak, N., et al., “Effect of Matrix on the Ballistic Impact of Aramid Fabric Composite Laminates by Armor Piercing Projectiles,” Polymer Composites, 33, pp. 443–450 (2012).Google Scholar
29. Malhotra, A. and Guild, F. J., “Impact Damage to Composite Laminates: Effect of Impact Location,” Applied Composite Materials, 21, pp. 165–177 (2014).Google Scholar
30. Hossein Pol, M. and Liaghat, G. H., “Investigation of the High Velocity Impact Behavior of Nanocomposites,” Polymer Composites, DOI: 10.1002/pc. 23281 (2014).Google Scholar
31. Ha-Minh, C., Boussu, F., Kanit, T., Crépin, D. and Imad, A., “Effect of Frictions on the Ballistic Performance of a 3D Warp Interlock Fabric: Numerical Analysis,” Applied Composite Materials, 19, pp. 333–347 (2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
32. Arronche, L., Martínez, I., Saponara, V. L. and Ledesma, E., “Finite Element Modeling and Experimental Characterization of Enhanced Hybrid Composite Structures for Improved Crashworthiness,” Journal of Applied Mechanics, 80, pp. 902–909 (2013).Google Scholar
33. Chocron, S., et al., “Impacts and Waves in Dyneema® HB80 Strips and Laminates,” Journal of Applied Mechanics, 80, pp. 806–810 (2013).Google Scholar
34. Lassig, T., et al., “A Non-Linear Orthotropic Hydrocode Model for Ultra-High Molecular Weight Polyethylene in Impact Simulations,” International Journal of Impact Engineering, 75, pp. 110–122 (2015).Google Scholar
35. Shaker, M. A. and Riad, A. M., “Impact of Ceramic/Composite Light-Weight Targets by High-Speed Projectiles,” 13th International Conference on Aerospace Sciences & Aviation Technology, Egypt (2009).Google Scholar
36. Hallquist, J., LS-DYNA Keyword User's Manual, Volume 1, Version 971 Rev 5, Livermore Software Technology Corporation (LSTC), California, U.S.A, pp. 71–293 (2014).Google Scholar
37. Schwer, L., “Optional Strain Rate Form for the Johnson-Cook Constitutive Model & The Role of the Parameter Epsilon_0,” 6th German LS-DYNA User Forum, Germany (2007).Google Scholar
38. Hallquist, J., LS-DYNA Theory Manual, Version 971, Livermore Software Technology Corporation (LSTC), California, U.S.A, pp. 152–373 (2014).Google Scholar
39. Ambati, R., “Simulation and Analysis of Orthogonal Cutting and Drilling Processes using LS-DYNA,” M. S. Thesis, Department of Mechanical Engineering, University Of Stuttgart, Stuttgart, Germany (2008).Google Scholar
40. Rahimnejad Yazdi, A., Baharvandi, H. R., Abdizadeh, H., Purasad, J. and Fathi, A., “Effect of Sintering Temperature and Siliconcarbide Fraction on Density, Mechanical Properties and Fracture Mode of Alumina-Silicon Carbide Micro/Nanocomposites,” Materials & Design, 37, pp. 251–255 (2012).Google Scholar
41. Nemati, A., Surani, F., Abdizadeh, H. and Baharvandi, H. R., “The Effects of Nano Mgo on Physical and Mechanical Properties of Al2O3-SiC Composites,” Journal of Ceramic Science and Technology, 3, pp. 29–34 (2012).Google Scholar
42. Ghadami, S., Baharvandi, H. R. and Ghadami, F., “Influence of the Vol% SiC on Properties of Pressureless Al2O3/SiC Nanocomposites,” Journal of Composite Materials, DOI:10.1177/0021998315591300 (2015).Google Scholar
43. Meyers, M. A., Dynamic Behavior of Materials, Wiley & Sons, New Jersey, pp. 78–82 (1994).Google Scholar
44. Roy, O. C. W., “Investigation of Advanced Personel Armour Using Layered Construction,” M. S. Thesis, Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Monterey, Seaside, California, U.S.A. (2009).Google Scholar
45. Cunniff, P. M., “Dimensionless Parameters for Optimization of Textile-Based Body Armour Systems,” 18th International Symposium on Ballistics, USA (1999).Google Scholar