Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T19:18:21.389Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Study of Sewing Ring Geometry on Wall Shear Stress of Implanting Bi-Leaflet Aortic Valves, Using Computational Fluid Dynamics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 May 2011

C.-H. Hsu
C.-H. Hsu*
Affiliation:
Department of Mold and Die Engineering, National Kaohsiung University of Applied Sciences, Kaohsiung, Taiwan 81148, R.O.C.
*
* Associate Professor
Get access

Abstract

This paper concentrates on the wall shear stress discussion of implanting bi-leaflet aortic valve and concludes a better valve design. To simulate the haemodynamic characteristics of the blood flow, ANSYS CFX10.0 software was utilized to analyze the three-dimensional Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes equations. With a quasi-steady analysis model, we predict values of the blood velocity and the wall shear stress both over the valve leaflets and the endothelial lining. Analysis results highlight that leaflet opening angle and valve geometry affect the shear stress distribution and vortex flow regime. An analysis of haemodynamic study for the St. Jude valve with various openingangles is presented first and the sewing ring geometry change is then recommended. It is found that the wall shear stress decreases significantly after modifying the sewing ring geometry. Maximum shear stress reduces 18.5% compared to that of the original St. Jude model at peak systole. This would ease possible damage of endothelial lining of the aorta.

Keywords

Shear stressAortic valveHaemodynamic characteristics
Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Mechanics , Volume 25 , Issue 3 , September 2009 , pp. 323 - 333
Copyright
Copyright © The Society of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics, R.O.C. 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Yasir, A. O. and Chandana, P. R., “Prosthetic Heart Valves,” Surgery, 25, pp. 224–227 (2007).Google Scholar
2.Fry, D. L., “Certain Histological and Chemical Responses of the Vascular Interface to Acutely Induced Mechanical Stress in the Aorta of the Dog,” Circulation Research, 23, pp. 24–93 (1969).Google Scholar
3.King, M., David, T. and Fisher, J., “An Initial Parametric Study on Fluid Flow Through Bileaflet Mechanical Heart Valves, Using Computational Fluid Dynamics,” Journal of Engineering in Medicine, 208, pp. 63–72 (1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.Ge, L., Jones, S. C., Sotiropoulos, F., Healy, T. M. and Yoganathan, A. P., “Numerical Simulation of Flow in Mechanical Heart Valves: Grid Resolution and the Assumption of Flow Symmetry,” ASME Transaction: Journal of Biomechanical Engineering, 125, pp. 709–718 (2003).Google Scholar
5.Akutsu, T. and Saito, J., “Dynamic Particle Image Velocimetry Flow Analysis of the Flow Field Immediately Downstream of Bileaflet Mechanical Mitral Prostheses,” Journal of Artificial Organs, 9, pp. 165–178 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6.Lee, H., Tatsumi, E., Homma, A., Tsukiya, T. and Taenaka, Y., “Mechanism for Cavitation of Monoleaflet and Bileaflet Valves in an Artificial Heart,” Journal of Artificial Organs, 9, pp. 154–160 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7.Knoch, M., Reul, H., Kroger, R. and Rau, G., “Model Studies at Mechanical Aortic Heart Valve Prostheses — Part I: Steady State Flow Field and Pressure Loss Coefficients,” ASME Transaction: Journal of Biomechanical Engineering, 110, pp. 334–343 (1988).Google Scholar
8.Hsu, C. H., “A Visualization Design Environment for Quick Designs of Prosthetic Mechanical Heart Valves,” Ph.D. Dissertation, Dept. of Mechanical Engineering, Leeds University, U.K. (1995).Google Scholar
9.Walker, P. G. and Yoganathan, A. P., “In Vitro Pulsatile Flow Hemodynamics of Five Mechanical Aortic Heart Valve Prostheses,” Eur. J. Cardio-thorac. Surg., 6, pp. 13–123 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10.Launder, B. E. and Spalding, D. B., “The Numerical Computation of Turbulent Flows,” Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 3, pp. 269–289 (1974).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11.Patankar, S. V., Numerical Heat Transfer, Hemisphere, Washington, D.C. (1980).Google Scholar
12.Prakash, C. and Patankar, S. V., “A Control Volume Based Finite Element Method for Solving the Navier Stokes Equations Using Equal Order Velocity-Pressure Interpolation,” Numerical Heat Transfer, 8, pp. 259–280 (1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13.Yoganathan, A. P., Woo, Y. R. and Hsing, W. S., “Turbulent Shear Stress Measurements in the Vicinity of Aortic Valve Prostheses,” J. Biomechanics, 19, pp. 433–442 (1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14.Fry, D. L., “Acute Vascular Endothelial Changes Associated with Increased Blood Velocity Gradients,” Circ. Res., 12, pp. 165–197 (1968).CrossRefGoogle Scholar