Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T19:12:15.987Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Numerical Analysis of the Sulcus Vocalis Disorder on the Function of the Vocal Folds

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 October 2016

A. Vazifehdoostsaleh ,
N. Fatouraee ,
M. Navidbakhsh  and
F. Izadi
A. Vazifehdoostsaleh
Affiliation:
Department of Biomedical EngineeringScience and Research BranchIslamic Azad UniversityTehran, Iran
N. Fatouraee*
Affiliation:
Biological Fluid Mechanics Research LaboratoryBiomechanics DepartmentAmirkabir University of TechnologyTehran, Iran
M. Navidbakhsh
Affiliation:
School of Mechanical EngineeringIran University of Science and TechnologyTehran, Iran
F. Izadi
Affiliation:
ENT-Head and Neck Research Center and DepartmentHazratrasoulakram HospitalUnivercity of Medical SciencesTehran, Iran
*
*Corresponding author ([email protected])
Get access

Abstract

Speaking is a very complex process resulting from the interaction between the air flow along the larynx and the vibrating structure of the vocal folds. Sulcus is a disease missing layers in the vocal folds result in cracks resulting in some disorders in producing sounds. Sulcus and its effects on the vocal cord vibrations are numerically studied for the first time in this paper. An ideal model of healthy vocal folds and Sulcus vocalis has been two-dimensionally defined and the finite element model of vocal folds is solved in a fully coupled form. The proposed calculative model was used in a fluid range of the computational fluid dynamics, arbitrary Lagrangian-Eulerian (ALE), incompressible continuity and Navier-Stokes equations and in a structure range of a three-layer elastic linear model. Self-excited oscillations were presented for vocal folds among type II patients and compared with healthy models. Responses were qualitatively and quantitatively studied. The healthy model was compared with numerical and empirical results. In addition, the effects of the disease on the flow parameters and the vibration frequency of the vocal folds were studied. According to the simulated model, the oscillation frequency decreased 25% and the average and instantaneous volume flux significantly increased compared to healthy samples. Results may help present a guideline for surgery and subsequently evaluate patients’ improvement.

Keywords

Vocal foldsFluid-solid interaction (FSI)Self-excited oscillationSulcus vocalis
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Mechanics , Volume 33 , Issue 4 , August 2017 , pp. 513 - 520
Copyright
Copyright © The Society of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Zörner, S., Kaltenbacher, M. and Döllinger, M., “Investigation of prescribed movement in fluid–structure interaction simulation for the human phonation process,” Computers & Fluids, 86, pp. 133–140 (2013).Google Scholar
2. Flanagan, J.L. and Landgraf, L., “Self-oscillating source for vocal-tract synthesizers,” Audio and Electroacoustics, IEEE Transactions on, 16, pp. 57–64 (1968).Google Scholar
3. Ishizaka, K. and Flanagan, J.L., “Synthesis of Voiced Sounds From a Two-Mass Model of the Vocal Cords,” Bell System Technical Journal, 51, pp. 1233–1268 (1972).Google Scholar
4. Yang, A., et al., “Biomechanicalmodeling of the three-dimensional aspects of human vocal fold dynamics,” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 127, pp. 1014–1031 (2010).Google Scholar
5. Rosa, M. de O., Pereira, J.C., Grellet, M. and Alwan, A., “A contribution to simulating a three- dimensional larynx model using the finite element method,” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 114, pp. 2893–2905 (2003).Google Scholar
6. Luo, H., Mittal, R. and Bielamowicz, S.A., “Analysis of flow-structure interaction in the larynx during phonation using an immersed-boundary method,” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 126, pp. 816–824 (2009).Google Scholar
7. Van den Berg, J., Zantema, J. and Doornenbal, P. Jr, “On the air resistance and the Bernoulli effect of the human larynx,” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 29, pp. 626–631 (1957).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. LaMar, M.D., Qi, Y. and Xin, J., “Modeling vocal fold motion with a hydrodynamic semi continuum model,” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 114, pp. 455–464 (2003).Google Scholar
9. Zheng, X., Mittal, R., Xue, Q. and Bielamowicz, S., “Direct-numerical simulation of the glottal jet and vocal-fold dynamics in a three-dimensional laryngeal model,” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 130, pp. 404–415 (2011).Google Scholar
10. de Luzan, C.F., Chen, J., Mihaescu, M., Khosla, S.M. and Gutmark, E., “Computational study of false vocal folds effects on unsteady airflows through static models of the human larynx,” Journal of Biomechanics, 48, pp. 1248–1257 (2015).Google Scholar
11. Feistauer, M., Hasnedlová-Prokopová, J., Horáček, J., Kosík, A. and Kučera, V., “DGFEM for dynamical systems describing interaction of compressible fluid and structures,” Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics, 254, pp. 17–30 (2013).Google Scholar
12. Smith, S. L. and Thomson, S. L., “Influence of subglottic stenosis on the flow-induced vibration of a computational vocal fold model,” Journal of Fluids and Structures, 38, pp. 77–91 (2013).Google Scholar
13. Dailey, S. H. and Ford, C. N., “Surgical management of sulcus vocalis and vocal fold scarring,” Otolaryngologic Clinics of North America, 39, pp. 23–42 (2006).Google Scholar
14. Ford, C. N., Inagi, K., Khidr, A., Bless, D. M. and Gilchrist, K. W., “Sulcus vocalis: a rational analytical approach to diagnosis and management,” Annals of Otology, Rhinology & Laryngology, 105, pp. 189–200 (1996).Google Scholar
15. Choi, S. H., Zhang, Y., Jiang, J. J., Bless, D. M. and Welham, N. V., “Nonlinear dynamic-based analysis of severe dysphonia in patients with vocal fold scar and sulcus vocalis,” Journal of Voice, 26, pp. 566–576 (2012).Google Scholar
16. Welham, N. V., Dailey, S. H., Ford, C. N. and Bless, D. M., “Voice handicap evaluation of patients with pathologic sulcus vocalis,” Annals of Otology, Rhinology & Laryngology, 116, pp. 411–417 (2007).Google Scholar
17. Vieira, R. T., et al., “Combining entropy measures and cepstral analysis for pathological voices assessment,” Journal of Medical and Biological Engineering, 32, pp. 429–435 (2012).Google Scholar
18. Cheng, D., Hung, C. and Pi, S., “Numerical simulation of near-field explosion,” Journal of Applied Science and Engineering, 16, pp. 61–67 (2013).Google Scholar
19. Furmanik, F., Szczepińska, J. and Biegaj, R., “Relation of some dimensions of the middle part of the laryngeal cavity to span of the greater horns of the hyoid bone,” Folia Morphologica, 5, pp. 123–131 (1976).Google Scholar
20. Scherer, R., Vail, V. and Rockwell, B., “Examination of the laryngeal adduction measure EGGW,” Producing Speech: Contemporary Issues: for Katherine Safford Harris, pp. 269–290 (1995).Google Scholar
21. Sakakibara, K. I., Imagawa, H., Niimi, S. and Tayama, N., “Physiological study of the supraglottal-structure,” Proceedings of the International Conference on Voice Physiology and Biomechanics, Marseille, France (2004).Google Scholar
22. Thomson, S.L., Mongeau, L. and Frankel, S.H., “Physical and numerical flow-excitedvocal fold models,” 3rd International Workshop MAVEBA,. Firenze University Press, Firenze, pp. 147–150 (2003).Google Scholar
23. Scherer, R. C., Torkaman, S., Kucinschi, B. R. and Afjeh, A. A., “Intraglottal pressures in a three-dimensional model with a non-rectangular glottal shape,” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 128, pp. 828–838 (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
24. Hallquist, J. O., LS-DYNA Theory Manual, Livermore Software Technology Corporation, Livermore 3, pp. 1–680 (2006).Google Scholar
25. Hirano, M., “Structure and vibratory behavior of the vocal folds,” Dynamic Aspects of Speech Production, pp. 13–27 (1977).Google Scholar
26. Tao, C., Zhang, Y., Hottinger, D.G. and Jiang, J.J., “Asymmetric airflow and vibration induced by the Coanda effect in a symmetric model of the vocal folds,” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 122, pp. 2270–2278 (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
27. Vorgelegt, V., “A Finite Element Scheme for Fluid–Solid–Acoustics Interactions and its Application to Human Phonation,” PhD Dissertation, University of Erlangen, Nurnberg, Germany (2008).Google Scholar
28. Zheng, X., “Biomechanical Modelling Of Glottal Aerodynamics and Vcal fold Vibration During,” PhD Dissertation, Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, George Washington University, Washington, U.S.A. (2009).Google Scholar
29. Alipour, F. and Scherer, R. C., “Characterizing glottal jet turbulence,” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 119, pp. 1063–1073 (2006).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed