No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
A Non-Iterative Direct Displacement-Based Design Procedure for SDOF Steel Columns: Using Substitute Structure
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 May 2011
Abstract
Traditionally, the yield displacement of a nonlinear structure was calculated by using the direct displacement-based seismic design method which usually requires a repeatedly iterative procedure no matter whether the substitute structure or inelastic design spectra has been adopted in the procedure. This will sometimes result in inefficiency if too many iterative cycles need to be produced in a design case for convergency. To avoid this disadvantage, this paper presents a non-iterative direct displacement-based design procedure for SDOF steel columns using the substitute structure approach. By combining the yielding property with the stiffness property of the designed steel columns, the procedure can immediately obtain the column's cross-section via the chosen target displacement and ductility ratio.
- Type
- Articles
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © The Society of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics, R.O.C. 2003
References
REFERENCES
[1] ATC-40, Seismic Evaluation and Retrofit of Concrete Building, Applied Technology Council, Redwood City, California (1996).Google Scholar
[2] FEMA 273, NEHRP Guidelines for the Seismic Rehabilitation of Buildings, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, D.C. (1997).Google Scholar
[3]Gulkan, P. and Sozen, M., “Inelastic Response of Reinforced Concrete Structures to Earthquake Motions,” ACI Journal, 71(12), pp. 604–610 (1974).Google Scholar
[4]Kowalsky, M. J., Priestley, M. J. N. and MacRae, G. A., “Displacement-Based Design, a Methodology for Seismic Design Applied to SDOF Reinforced Concrete Structures,” Report No. SSRP-94/16, Structural System Research Project, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California (1994).Google Scholar
[5]Moehle, J. P., “Displacement-Based Design of R/C Structures Subjected to Earthquakes,” Earthquake Spectra, 8(3), pp. 403–427 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[6]Calvi, G. M. and Kingsley, G. R., “Displacement-Based Seismic Design of MDOF Bridge Structures,” Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 24(9), pp. 1247–1266 (1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[7]Priestley, M. J. N., Kowasky, M. J. and Ranzo, G., “Preliminary Development of Direct Displacement-Based Design for MDOF Systems,” Proceedings of the 65th Annual Convention, SEAOC, Maui, Hawaii (1996).Google Scholar
[8]Priestley, M. J. N., “Displacement-Based Seismic Assessment of Reinforced Concrete Buildings,” Journal of Earthquake Engineering, 1(1), pp. 157–192 (1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[9]Priestley, M. J. N. and Kowasky, M. J., “Direct Displacement-Based Seismic of Concrete Buildings,” Bulletin of the New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering, 33(4), pp. 421–442 (2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[10]Lin, Y. Y., Tsai, M. H. and Chang, K. C., “Displacement-Based Seismic Design for Buildings,” Journal of the Chinese Institute of Engineers, 25(1), pp. 89–98 (2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[11]Wallace, J. W., “Seismic Design of RC Structural Walls, Part I: New Code Format,” Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, 121(1), pp. 75–100 (1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[12]Sasani, M. and Anderson, J. G., “Displacement-Based Design versus Force-Based Design for Structural Walls,” Proceedings of the 11th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Acapulco, Mexico (1976).Google Scholar
[13]Bachmann, H. and Dazio, A., “A Deformation-Based Seismic Design Procedure for Structural Wall Buildings,” Proceeding of the International Workshop on Seismic Design Methodologies for the Next Generation of Codes, pp. 159–170 (1965).Google Scholar
[14]Court, A. B. and Kowalsky, M. J., Performance-Based Engineering of Buildings—a Displacement Design Apporach, Structural Engineering World Wide, SEAOC, Paper No. T109–1 (1998).Google Scholar
[15]Chopra, A. K. and Goel, R. K., “Direct Displacement-Based Design: Use of Inelastic vs. Elastic Design Spectra,” Earthquake Spectra, 17(1), pp. 47–64 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[16]Fajfar, P., “Capacity Spectrum Method Based on Inelastic Demand Spectra,” Earthquake Engineering & Structure Dynamics, 28, pp. 979–993 (1999).3.0.CO;2-1>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[17]Shibata, A. and Sozen, M., “Substitute Structure Method for Seismic Design in Reinforced Concrete,” Journal of the Structural Division, ASCE, 102(ST1), pp. 1–18 (1976).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[18]Hudson, D. E., “Equivalent Viscous Friction for Hysteretic Systems with Earthquake-Like Excitations,” Pro., 3rd world Confi on Earthquake Engrg., Vol. II, pp. 185–202 (1965).Google Scholar
[19]Jennings, P. C., “Equivalent Viscous Damping for Yielding Structures,” Journal of the Engineering Mechanics Division, ASCE, 94(EM1), pp. 103–116(1968).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[20]Iwan, W. D. and Gates, N. C., “Estimating Earthquake Response of Simple Hysteretic Structures,” Journal of the Engineering Mechanics Division, ASCE, 105(EM3), pp. 391–405 (1979).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[21]Tsai, K. C. and Li, J. W., A General Purpose Computer Program for Static and Dynamic Analysis of Inelastic 2D Structures Supplemented with a Graphic Processor, Report No. CEER/R83–03, Center for Earthquake Engineering Research, National Taiwan University (1994).Google Scholar