Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T12:01:31.324Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Dynamic Analysis and Ride Quality Evaluation of Railway Vehicles – Numerical Simulation and Field Test Verification

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 May 2011

Y.-T. Fan  and
W.-F. Wu
Y.-T. Fan*
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan 10617, R.O.C.
W.-F. Wu*
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan 10617, R.O.C.
*
*Graduate student
**Professor
Get access

Abstract

A rather complete dynamic model with special emphases on nonlinear conicity and creep force and in consideration of random irregularity of rail profile is proposed to simulate the response and investigate the ride quality of railway vehicles. The CP341 vehicle that will soon be used in Taipei Rapid Transit System is considered in particular as the studied role model. Some of the field test data carried out for this type of vehicle are revealed as well and used for the verification of the proposed model. Both simulation and test results show that the resonant frequency of the studied vehicle is in the range of 0.6∼1 Hz, and the one-third octave root-mean-square acceleration curves of the vehicle in all studied cases meet the ride quality criteria set for the mass rapid transit vehicle systems. It is observed that the secondary suspension of the vehicle has the low frequency filtering property and the primary suspension has high frequency characteristics. A poorer ride quality in vertical direction rather than in lateral direction is also confirmed in the study. It is concluded that the proposed model can be used to simulate the dynamic response and evaluate the ride quality of any railway vehicle.

Keywords

Ride qualityRailway vehicleTrack irregularity.
Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Mechanics , Volume 22 , Issue 1 , March 2006 , pp. 1 - 11
Copyright
Copyright © The Society of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics, R.O.C. 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1.Garg, V. K. and Dukkipati, R. V., Dynamics of Railway Vehicle System, Academic Press (1984).Google Scholar
2.ISO 2631–4 Mechanical Vibration and Shock- Evaluation of Human Exposure to Whole-body Vibration, Part 4: Guidelines for the Evaluation of the Effects of Vibration and Rotational Motion on Passenger and Crew Comfort in Fixed Guideway Transport System (2001).Google Scholar
3.ISO 2631/1 Mechanical Vibration and Shock- Evaluation of Human Exposure to Whole-body Vibration, Part 1: General Requirements (1985).Google Scholar
4.ISO 2631–1 Mechanical Vibration and Shock- Evaluation of Human Exposure to Whole-Body Vibration, Part 1: General Requirements (1997).Google Scholar
5.Kim, Y. G., Kwon, H. B., Kim, S. W., Park, C. K. and Park, T. W., “Correlation of Ride Comfort Evaluation Methods for Railway Vehicles,” Proc. Inst. Mech. Engrs., Part F: Journal of Rail and Rapid Transit, 217, pp. 73–88 (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6.Suzuki, H., “Research Trends on Riding Comfort Evaluation in Japan,” Proc. Inst. Mech. Engrs., Part F: Journal of Rail and Rapid Transit, 212, pp. 61–72 (1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7.Law, E. H. and Brand, R. S., “Analysis of the Nonlinear Dynamics of a Railway Vehicle Wheelset,” Journal of Dynamic Systems, Measurement, and Control, ASME, 95, pp. 28–35 (1973).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8.Law, E. H. and Cooperrider, N. K., “A Survey of Railway Vehicle Dynamics Research,” Journal of Dynamic Systems, Measurement, and Control, ASME, 96, pp. 132–146 (1974).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9.Horak, D. and Wormley, D. N., “Nonlinear Stability and Tracking of Rail Passenger Trucks,” Journal of Dynamic Systems, Measurement, and Control, ASME, 104, pp. 256–263 (1982).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10.True, H., “Dynamics of a Rolling Wheelset,” Applied Mechanics Review, ASME, 46(7), pp. 438–444 (1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11.Andersson, C. and Abrahamsson, T., “Simulation of Interaction between a Train in General Motion and a Track,” Vehicle System Dynamics, 38(6), pp. 433–455 (2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12.Shan, M., Thirumalai, M., Cui, K. and Mcgirt, P., “Symbolic Methods for Modeling Rail Vehicle Systems,” International Journal of Vehicle Design, 18(5), pp. 487–517 (1997).Google Scholar
13.Cox, J. J., Herdrick, J. K. and Cooperrider, N. K., “Optimization of Rail Vehicle Operating Speed with Practical Constraints,” Journal of Dynamic Systems, Measurement, and Control, ASME, 100, pp. 260–269 (1978).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14.Chang, E. H., Garg, V. K., Goodspeed, C. H. and Singh, S. P., “Comparative Study of the Linear and Non-linear Locomotive Response,” Journal of Dynamic Systems, Measurement, and Control, ASME, 101, pp. 263–271 (1979).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15.Fermer, M. and Niesen, J. C. O., “Vertical Interaction between Train and Track with Soft and Stiff Railpads -Full-Scale Experiments and Theory,” Proc. Inst. Mech. Engrs., Part F: Journal of Rail and Rapid Transit, 209, pp. 39–47 (1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16.Bracciali, A., Cascini, G. and Ciuffi, R., “Time Domain Model of the Vertical Dynamics of a Railway Track up to 5kHz,” Vehicle System Dynamics, 30, pp. 1–15 (1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17.Diana, G., Cheli, F., Collina, A., Corradi, R. and Melzi, S., “The Development of a Numerical Model for Railway Vehicles Comfort Assessment through Comparison with Experimental Measurements,” Vehicle System Dynamics, 38(3), pp. 165–183 (2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18.Zhao, C. F. and Zhai, W. M., “Maglev Vehicle/Guideway Vertical Random Response and Ride Quality,” Vehicle System Dynamics, 38(3), pp. 185–210 (2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19.Kalker, J. J., “Wheel-Rail Rolling Contact Theory,” Wear, 144, pp. 243–261 (1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
20.He, Y. and Mcphee, J., “Optimization of the Lateral Stability of Rail Vehicles,” Vehicle System Dynamics, 38(5), pp. 361–390 (2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
21.Lei, X. and Noda, N. A., “Analyses of Dynamic Response of Vehicle and Track Coupling System with Random Irregularity of Track Vertical Profile,” Journal of Sound and Vibration, 258(1), pp. 147–165 (2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar