Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T19:14:37.443Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Development of a Numerical Based Correlation for Performance Losses due to Surface Roughness in Axial Turbines

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 March 2014

S. A. Moshizi ,
M. H. Nakhaei ,
M. J. Kermani  and
A. Madadi
S. A. Moshizi*
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Amirkabir University of Technology (Tehran Polytechnic), Tehran, Iran, 15875-4413
M. H. Nakhaei
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Amirkabir University of Technology (Tehran Polytechnic), Tehran, Iran, 15875-4413
M. J. Kermani
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Amirkabir University of Technology (Tehran Polytechnic), Tehran, Iran, 15875-4413
A. Madadi
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Amirkabir University of Technology (Tehran Polytechnic), Tehran, Iran, 15875-4413
*
*[email protected]
Get access

Abstract

In the present work, a recently developed in-house 2D CFD code is used to study the effect of gas turbine stator blade roughness on various performance parameters of a two-dimensional blade cascade. The 2D CFD model is based on a high resolution flux difference splitting scheme of Roe (1981). The Reynolds Averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) equations are closed using the zero-equation turbulence model of Baldwin-Lomax (1978) and two-equation Shear Stress Transport (SST) turbulence model. For the smooth blade, results are compared with experimental data to validate the model. Finally, a correlation between roughness Reynolds number and loss coefficient for both turbulence models is presented and tested for three other roughness heights. The results of 2D turbine blade cascades can be used for one-dimensional models such as mean line analysis or quasi-three-dimensional models e.g. streamline curvature method.

Keywords

Surface roughnessGas turbine cascadeRoe schemeShear stress transportBaldwin-Lomax model
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Mechanics , Volume 30 , Issue 6 , December 2014 , pp. 631 - 642
Copyright
Copyright © The Society of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics, R.O.C. 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Lakshminarasimha, A. N., Boyce, M. P. and Meher-Homji, C. B., “Modeling and Analysis of Gas Turbine Performance Deterioration,” Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power, 116, pp. 46–52 (1994).Google Scholar
2.Yun, Y. I., Park, I. Y. and Song, S. J., “Performance Degradation Due to Blade Surface Roughness in a Single-Stage Axial Turbine,” Journal of Turbomachinery, 127, pp. 137–143 (2005).Google Scholar
3.Bammert, K. and Sandstede, H., “Measurements of the Boundary Layer Development Along a Turbine Blade with Rough Surfaces,” Journal for Engineering for Power, 102, pp. 978–983 (1980).Google Scholar
4.El-Batsh, H. and Haselbacher, H., “Numerical Investigation of the Effect of Ash Particle Deposition on the Flow Field Through Turbine Cascades,” ASME Proceedings, 5, pp. 1035–1043 (2002).Google Scholar
5.Hummel, F., Cardamone, P., Fottner, L. and Lötzerich, M., “Surface Roughness Effects on Turbine Blade Aero-dynamics,” Journal of Turbomachinery, 127, pp. 453–461 (2004).Google Scholar
6.Arts, T., De Rouvroit, L. and Rutherford, A. W., “Aero-thermal Investigation of a Highly Loaded Transonic Linear Turbine Guide Vane Cascade: A Test Case for Inviscid and Viscous Flow Computations,” Technical note Von Karman Institute for Fluid Dynamics Voulume 174, von Karman Institute for Fluid Dynamics, Belgium (1990).Google Scholar
7.Cebeci, T. and Chang, K. C., “Calculation of Incompressible Rough-Wall Boundary-Layer Flows,” AIAA Journal, 16, pp. 730–735 (1978).Google Scholar
8.Boyle, R. J., “Prediction of Surface Roughness and Incidence Effects on Turbine Performance,” Journal of Turbomachinery, 116, pp. 745–751 (1994).Google Scholar
9.Boyle, R. J. and Civinskas, K. C., “Two-Dimensional Navier-Stokes Heat Transfer Analysis for Rough Turbine Blades,” 27th Joint Propulsion Conference, Sacramento, California (1991).Google Scholar
10.Kang, Y. S., Yoo, J. C. and Kang, S. H., “Numerical Study of Roughness Effects on a Turbine Stage Performance,” ASME Proceedings Turbomachinery, 5, pp. 1267–1274 (2004).Google Scholar
11.Morini, M., Pinelli, M., Spina, P. R. and Venturini, M., “Influence of Blade Deterioration on Compressor and Turbine Performance,” Journal of Engineering for Gas Turbines and Power, 132, pp. 032401–032411 (2009).Google Scholar
12.Boyle, R. J. and Senyitko, R. G., “Measurements and Predictions of Surface Roughness Effects on Turbine Vane Aerodynamics,” Proceedings of the ASME Turbo Expo, Nevada, U.S.A (2003).Google Scholar
13.Baldwin, B. and Lomax, H., “Thin-Layer Approximation and Algebraic Model for Separated Turbulentflows,” 16th Aerospace Sciences Meeting, American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Huntsville (1978).Google Scholar
14.Chima, R. V., “Application of the K-Omega Turbulence Model to Quasi-Three-Dimensional Turbomachinery Flows,” AIAA Journal of Propulsion and Power, 12, pp. 1176–1179 (1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15.Lampart, P., Swirydczuk, J. and Gardzilewicz, A., “On the Prediction of Flow Patterns and Losses in HP Axial Turbine Stages Using 3D RANS Solve with Two Turbulence Models,” TASK Quarterly, 5, (2001).Google Scholar
16.Yershov, S. V., Rusanov, A. V. and Shapochka, A. Y., “3D Viscous Transonic Turbomachine Flows: Numerical Simulation and Optimisation Using Code FlowER,” 5th Internat. Symp. Aerothermo-dynamics of Internal Flows, Gdansk, Poland (2001).Google Scholar
17.Roe, P. L., “Approximate Riemann Solvers, Parameter Vectors, and Difference Schemes,” Journal of Computational Physics, 43, pp. 357–372 (1981).Google Scholar
18.Hoffmann, K. A. and Chiang, S. T., Computational Fluid Dynamics, Engineering Education System, U.S. (2000).Google Scholar
19.van Albada, G. D., van Leer, B. and Roberts, W. W. J., “A Comparative Study of Computational Methods in Cosmic Gas Dynamics,” Astronomy and Astrophysics, 108, pp. 76–84 (1982).Google Scholar
20.Kermani, M. and Plett, E., “Roe Scheme in Generalized Coordinates. I — Formulations,” 39th Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics (2001).Google Scholar
21.Kermani, M. and Plett, E., “Roe Scheme in Generalized Coordinates. II — Application to Inviscid and Viscous Flows,” 39th Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics (2001).Google Scholar
22.Menter, F. R., “Two-Equation Eddy-Viscosity Turbulence Models for Engineering Applications,” AIAA Journal, 32, pp. 1598–1605 (1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
23.Smith, A. M. O. and Cebeci, T., “Numerical Solution of the Turbulent Boundary Layer Equations,” Douglas Aircraft Division Report DAC 33735 (1967).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
24.Schlichting, H., Boundary-Layer Theory, 8th Edition, McGraw-Hill, New York, USA (1979).Google Scholar
25.Wilcox, D. C., Turbulence Modeling for CFD, 3rd edition, DCW Industries, Inc., La Canada, CA (2006).Google Scholar
26.Streiner, S., Krämer, E., Eulitz, A. and Armbruster, P., “Aeroelastic Analysis of Wind Turbines Applying 3D CFD Computational Results,” Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 75 (2007).Google Scholar
27.Srinivasan, G. R., Ekaterinaris, J. A. and McCroskey, W. J., “Evaluation of Turbulence Models for Unsteady Flows of an Oscillating Airfoil,” Computers & Fluids, 24, pp. 833–861 (1995).Google Scholar
28.Emery, J. C., Herrig, L. J., Erwin, J. R. and Felix, A. R., “Systematic Two-Dimensional Cascade Tests of NACA 65-Series Compressor Blades at Low Speeds,” NACA-Report-1368 (1958).Google Scholar
29.Apsley, D., “CFD Calculation of Turbulent Flow with Arbitrary Wall Roughness,” Flow Turbulence Combust, 78, pp. 153–175 (2007).Google Scholar
30.Singoria, V. K., “Samsher, Mechanism, Characterization, Pattern and Effect of Roughness over Turbine Blade: A Review,” International Journal of Engineering and Innovative, 2, pp. 190–200 (2013).Google Scholar
31.Taylor, R. P., “Surface Roughness Measurements on Gas Turbine Blades,” Journal of Turbomach, 112, pp. 175–180 (1990).Google Scholar
32.Koch, C. C. and Smith, J. L. H., “Loss Sources and Magnitudes in Axial-Flow Compressors,” Journal for Engineering for Power, 98, pp. 411–424 (1976).Google Scholar