Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T12:47:08.621Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Biomechanical Role of the Locomotor System in Controlling Body Center of Mass Motion in Older Adults During Obstructed Gait

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 May 2011

T.-M. Wang*
Affiliation:
Institute of Biomedical Engineering, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan 10617, R.O.C. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan 10002, R.O.C.
H.-L. Chen*
Affiliation:
School of Occupational Therapy, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan 10617, R.O.C.
W.-C. Hsu*
Affiliation:
Institute of Biomedical Engineering, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan 10617, R.O.C.
M.-W. Liu*
Affiliation:
Institute of Biomedical Engineering, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan 10617, R.O.C. Department of Surgery, Taiwan Adventist Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan 40143, R.O.C.
T.-W. Lu*
Affiliation:
Institute of Biomedical Engineering, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan 10617, R.O.C.
*
* M.D., Ph.D.
** Ph.D.
** Ph.D.
* M.D., Ph.D.
*** Professor, corresponding author
Get access

Abstract

Fifteen young and fifteen older healthy adults walked and crossed obstacles of three different heights while kinematic data and ground reaction forces were acquired to calculate the three-dimensional motion of the centre of mass (COM) and lower limb joint moments. The older group had greater normalized jerk score of the COM. When the leading limb was crossing, the older group kept the COM more posterior and on the trailing stance limb for longer with increased knee extensor crossing moments and thus decreased anterioposterior COM deceleration. When the trailing limb was crossing, the older group decreased vertical COM deceleration through increased hip extensor crossing moments. The older group maintained the same COM motion as the young in the frontal plane with greater hip and knee abductor crossing moments. The older group exhibited significant kinetic changes in their locomotor system with increased muscular demand, leading to a more jerky motion of the body COM. However, these changes helped to maintain the frontal COM motion and to achieve a sagittal COM motion pattern which is thought to be helpful for a safe and successful obstacle-crossing. Failure to meet the kinetic demands in the elderly may increase the risk of falls during obstacle-crossing.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © The Society of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics, R.O.C. 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Overstall, P. W.Exton-Smith, A. N., Imms, F. J. and Johnson, A. L., “Falls in the Elderly Related to Postural Imbalance,” British Medical Journal, 1, pp. 261264 (1977).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.Blake, A. J., Morgan, K., Bendall, M. J., Dallosso, H., Ebrahim, S. B., Arie, T. H., Fentem, P. H. and Bassey, E. J., “Falls by Elderly People at Home: Prevalence and Associated Factors,” Age and Ageing, 17, pp. 365372 (1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.Campbell, A. J., Borrie, M. J., Spears, G. F., Jackson, S. L., Brown, J. S. and Fitzgerald, J. L., “Circumstances and Consequences of Falls Experienced by a Community Population 70 Years and Over During a Prospective Study ” Age and Ageing, 19, pp. 136141 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.Tinetti, M. E., Speechley, M. and Ginter, S. F., “Risk Factors for Falls Among Elderly Persons Living in the Community,” New England Journal of Medicine, 319, pp. 17011707(1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5.Chou, L. S., Kaufman, K. R., Brey, R. H. and Draganich, L. F., “Motion of the Whole Body's of Mass When Stepping Over Obstacles of Different Heights,” Gait and Posture, 13, pp. 1726 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6.Chou, L. S., Kaufman, K. R., Hahn, M. E. and Brey, R. H., “Medio-Lateral Motion of the Center of Mass During Obstacle Crossing Distinguishes Elderly Individuals with Imbalance,” Gait and Posture, 18, pp. 125133 (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7.Hahn, M. E. and Chou, L. S., “Age-Related Reduction in Sagittal Plane Center of Mass Motion During Obstacle Crossing,” Journal of Biomechanics, 37, pp. 837844 (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8.Saunders, J. B., Inman, V. T. and EBerhart, H. D., “The Major Determinants in Normal and Pathological Gait,” Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 35A, pp. 543558 (1953).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9.Winter, D. A., “Human Balance and Posture Control During Standing and Walking,” Gait and Posture, 3, pp. 193214(1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10.McFadyen, B. J. and Winter, D. A., “Anticipatory Locomotor Adjustment During Obstructed Human Walking,” Neuroscience Research Communication, 9, pp. 3744 (1991).Google Scholar
11.Chou, L. S. and Draganich, L. F., “Stepping Over an Obstacle Increases the Motions and Moments of the Joints of the Trailing Limb in Young Adults,” Journal of Biomechanics, 30, pp. 331337 (1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12.Chou, L. S. and Draganich, L. F., “Increasing Obstacle Height and Decreasing Toe-Obstacle Distance Affect the Joint Moments of the Stance Limb Differently when Stepping Over an Obstacle.,” Gait and Posture, 8, pp. 186204 (1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13.Chen, H. L. and Lu, T. W., “Comparisons of the Joint Moments Between Leading and Trailing Limb in Young Adults when Stepping Over Obstacles,” Gait and Posture, 23, pp. 6977 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14.McFadyen, B. J. and Prince, F., “Avoidance and Accommodation of Surface Height Changes by Healthy, Community-Dwelling, Young, and Elderly Men,” Journals of Gerontology Series –Biological Sciences & Medical Sciences, 57, pp. B166174 (2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15.Draganich, L. F. and Kuo, C. E., “The Effects of Walking Speed on Obstacle Crossing in Healthy Young and Healthy Older Adults,“ Journal of Biomechanics, 37, pp. 889896 (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16.Lin, H. C., Lu, T. W. and Hsu, H. C., “Comparisons of Joint Kinetics in the Lower Extremity Between Stair Ascent and Descent,” Journal of Mechanics, 21, pp. 4150 (2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17.Bell, A. L., Pedersen, D. R. and Brand, R. A., “A Comparison of the Accuracy of Several Hip Center Location Prediction Methods,” Journal of Biomechanics, 23, pp. 617621 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18.Lu, T.-W., Chen, H.-L. and Wang, T.-M., “Obstacle Crossing in Older Adults with Medial Compartment Knee Osteoarthritis,” Gait and Posture, 26, pp. 553559 (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19.Winter, D. A., Biomechanics and Motor Control of Human Movement, 3rd Ed., New York (2005).Google Scholar
20.Woltring, H. J., “A FORTRAN Package for Generalized, Cross-Validatory Spline Smoothing and Differentiation,” Advances in Engineering Software, 8, pp. 104113(1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
21.Chang, J. J., Wu, T. I., Wu, W. L. and Su, F. C., “Kinematical Measure for Spastic Reaching in Children with Cerebral Palsy,” Clinical Biomechanics, 20, pp. 381388 (2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
22.Huang, S. C., Lu, T. W., Chen, H. L. and Wang, T. M., “Age and Height Effects on the Center of Mass and Center of Pressure Inclination Angles During Obstacle-Crossing,” Medical Engineering and Physics (2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
23.Lu, T. W., Chen, H. L. and Chen, S. C., “Comparisons of the Lower Limb Kinematics Between Young and Older Adults when Crossing Obstacles of Different Heights,” Gait and Posture, 23, pp. 471479 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
24. Anne, M. and Anita, A., Occupational Therapy and Older People, Blackwell, London (2005).Google Scholar
25.Lord, S. R. and Dayhew, J., “Visual Risk Factors for Falls in Older People.,” Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 49, pp. 508515 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
26.Hahn, M. E., Lee, H. J. and Chou, L. S., “Increasing Muscular Challenge in Older Adults During Obstructed Gait,” Gait and Posture, 22, pp. 356361 (2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
27.Wei, T. S., Hu, C. H., Wang, S. H. and Hwang, K. L., “Fall Characterictics, Fubctional Mobility and Bone Mineral Density as Risk Factors of Hip Fracture in the Community-Dwelling Ambulatory Elderly,” Osteoporosis International, 12, pp. 10501055 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar