Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T15:08:14.608Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Behaviors of Drained Lateral Extension for Saturated Sand and Their Applications

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 May 2011

C.-P. Yang
C.-P. Yang*
Affiliation:
Department of Civil Engineering and Engineering Informatics, Chung Hua University, Hsinchu, Taiwan 30067, R.O.C.
*
*Associate Professor
Get access

Abstract

Practically all retaining walls may rotate, yet movements of the wall could be restricted, particularly under working conditions. Since the earth pressure on the retaining wall often deviates from the fully active state, there is a need for predicting the earth pressure at any wall movement. The shearing behavior of backfill behind the wall plays an essential role for predicting the redistributions of earth pressure for different wall movements. This paper studies 25 sets of test for analyzing the drained lateral extension behaviors of saturated Ottawa sand. Three methods are used to interpret the active state of specimens and it is found that the monotonic increasing property of the σ'cs – εrp plot obtained by using the (q')max method is more obvious than those obtained by the other two methods. Where σ'cs is an initial confining stress of specimen for lateral extension test, and εrp is a radial strain of specimen developed at the active state. The specimens, with the relative density between 15% ∼ 90% and with the confining stress between 80kPa ∼ 280kPa, range their values of εrp from −1.18% to −2.99%. The magnitude of εrp can be used to judge the secure level of deformation for a retaining structure. Subsequently, this study derives a formula to predict the redistribution of earth pressure on a retaining wall when the wall moving outwards based on the results of those lateral extension tests. This prediction method is a new approach to study the problems of earth pressure. Comparisons of predicted results from numerical solutions technique and observations from model tests show that the performance of this method is reasonable.

Keywords

Lateral extension behaviorsEarth pressure distributionRetaining wallSaturated sand.
Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Mechanics , Volume 23 , Issue 1 , March 2007 , pp. 51 - 62
Copyright
Copyright © The Society of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics, R.O.C. 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Sivakumar, V., Doran, I. G., Graham, J. and Navaneethan, T., “Relationship Between K o and Over-Consolidation Ratio: A Theoretical Approach,” Geotechnique, 52(3), pp. 225–230 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.Greco, V. R., “Active Earth Thrust by Backfills Subject to a Line Surcharge,” Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 42, pp. 1255–1263 (2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.Ghoudhury, D. and Singh, S., “New Approach for Estimation of Static and Seismic Active Earth Pressure,” Geotechnical and Geological Engineering, 24, pp. 117–1273 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.Moormann, C, “Analysis of Wall and Ground Movements Due to Deep Excavations in Soft Soil Based on a New Worldwide Database,” Soils and Foundations, Japanese Geotechnical Society, 44(1), pp. 87–98 (2004).Google Scholar
5.Ichihara, M. and Matsuzawa, H., “Correlations between Properties of Earth Pressure on Tilting Wall and the Shearing Characteristics of Dry Backfill Sand,” Journal of the Japanese Society of Civil Engineers, 176, pp. 61–74 (1970).Google Scholar
6.Bransby, P. L. and Milligan, G. W. E., “Soil Deformations near Cantilever Sheet Pile Walls,” Geotechnique, 25(2), pp. 175–195(1975).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7.Wang, Y. Z., “Distribution of Earth Pressure on a Retaining Wall,” Geotechnique, 50(1), pp. 83–88 (2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8.Paik, K. H. and Galgado, R., “Estimation of Active Earth Pressure against Rigid Retaining Walls Considering Arching Effects,” Geotechnique, 53(7), pp. 643–653 (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9.Wu, L. Y. and Tsai, Y. F., “Analysis of Earth Pressure for Retaining Wall and Ultimate Bearing Capacity for Shallow Foundation by Variational Method,” Journal of Mechanics, 20, pp. 43–56 (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10.Abdi, G. and Garga, V. K., “Laboratory Evaluation of Horizontal Stress in Overconsolidated Sands,” Geotechnical Testing Journal, 19(1), pp. 85–94 (1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11.Macky, R. D. and Kirk, D. P., “At Rest, Active and Passive Earth Pressures,” Proceedings, 4th Asian Conference on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, Bangkok, pp. 187–199(1967).Google Scholar
12.Sherif, M. A., Ishibashi, I. and Lee, C. D., “Earth Pressures against Rigid Retaining Walls,” Journal of the Geotechnical Engineering Division, ASCE, 108(GT5), pp. 679–695 (1982).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13.Sherif, M. A., Fang, Y. S. and Sherif, R. I., “K o and K o behind Rotating and Non-yielding Walls,” Journal of the Geotechnical Engineering Division, ASCE, 110(GT1), pp. 41–56(1984).Google Scholar
14.Banno, M., Nakai, T., Murata, K., Sakurai, T. and Hasimoto, T., “Model Tests on Excavation Problems with Different Wall Friction and Wall Stiffness,” Proceedings, 32 th Conference of Japanese Society of Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, Japan, Kumamoto, pp. 1679–1680 (1997).Google Scholar
15.Take, W. A. and Valsangkar, A. J., “Earth Pressures on Unyielding Retaining Walls of Narrow Backfill Width,” Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 38, pp. 1220–1230 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16.Benmebarek, N., Benmebarek, S., Kastner, R. and Soubra, A. H., “Passive and Active Earth Pressures in the Presence of Groundwater Flow,” Geotechnique, 56(3), pp. 149–158 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17.Barros, P. L. A., “A Coulomb-Type Solution for Active Earth Thrust with Seepage,” Geotechnique, 56(3), pp. 159–164 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18.Clough, G. W. and Duncan, J. M., “Finite Element Analyses of Retaining Wall Behavior,” Journal of the Soil Mechanics and Foundation Division, ASCE, 97(SM12), pp. 1657–1673 (1971).Google Scholar
19.Sugimoto, T., “Prediction for the Maximum Settlements of Ground Surface by Open Cut,” Journal of the Japanese Society of Civil Engineers, 373, pp. 113–120 (1986).Google Scholar
20.Lame, T. W. and Whitman, R. V., Soil Mechanics, SI Version, John Wiley & Sons Publishing Company, Ch.4, New York (1979).Google Scholar
21.Lade, P. V. and Duncan, J. M., “Stress-Path Dependent Behavior of Cohesionless Soil,” Journal of the Geotechnical Engineering Division, ASCE, 102(GT1), pp. 51–68(1976).Google Scholar
22.Suzuki, H., Tatsui, T. and Ishida, T., “Application of Triaxial Test Considering Earth Stress Path,” Proceedings, 32th Conference of Japanese Society of Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, Japan, Kumamoto, pp. 1301–1302(1997).Google Scholar
23.Katsura, Y. and Mitachi, T., “Simplified Estimation of Lateral Earth Pressure in Sandy Deposits during Excavation,” Proceedings, 32th Conference of Japanese Society of Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, Japan, Kumamoto, pp. 1687–1688 (1997).Google Scholar
24.Campanella, R and Vaid, Y., “A Simple K o Triaxial Cell,” Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 9(3), pp. 249–260 (1972).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
25.Hanzawa, H., “Field and Laboratory Behavior of Khor-Al Zubair Clay, Iraq,” Soils and Foundations, Japanese Society of Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, 17(4), pp. 17–30 (1977).Google Scholar
26.Daramola, O., “On Estimating K o for Overconsolidated Granular Soils,” Geotechnique, 30(3), pp. 310–313 (1980).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
27.Ampuda, S. and Tatsuoka, F., “An Automated Stress Path Controll Triaxial System,” Geotechnical Testing Journal, 12(3), pp. 238–243 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
28.Fukusima, S., Satoh, K. and Kagawa, K. J., “Measurement of K o-Values of Deep Ground Using Triaxial Cell,” Soils and Foundations, Japanese Society of Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, 31(4), pp. 218–225(1991).Google Scholar
29.Chen, W. J., “Micro-System Displacement and Profile Measurement by an Integrated Photon Tunneling and Confocal Microscope,” Chinese Journal of Mechanics, Series A, 18, pp. 173–183 (2002).Google Scholar
30.Okochi, Y. and Tatsuoka, F., “Some Factors Affecting K o-Values of Sand Measured in Triaxial Cell,” Soils and Foundations, Japanese Society of Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, 24(3), pp. 52–68 (1984).Google Scholar
31.Kasuno, Y. and Masumi, F., “The Influence of Lateral Strain Controlled Method on K o Consoidation Tests,” Proceedings, 17th Conference of Japanese Society of Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, pp. 229–232 (1982) (Japanese).Google Scholar
32.Pao, Y. H., “Applied Mechanics in Science and Engineering,” Chinese Journal of Mechanics, Series A, 16, pp. 53–66 (2000).Google Scholar
33.Kuo, M. K. and Lee, H T., “Inversion of Residual Stress,” Chinese Journal of Mechanics, Series A, 17, pp. 103–108(2001).Google Scholar
34.Bolton, M. D., “The Strength and Dilatancy of Sands,” Geotechnique, 36(1), pp. 65–78 (1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
35.Fang, Y. S. and Ishibashi, I., “Static Earth Pressure with Various Wall Movement,” Journal of the Geotechnical Engineering Division, ASCE, 120(GT8), pp. 1307–1323 (1986).Google Scholar
36.Chang, M. F., “Lateral Earth Pressures behind Rotating Walls,” Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 34, pp. 498–509 (1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
37.Ng, T. T., “Behavior of Gravity Deposited Granular Material under Different Stress Paths,” Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 42, pp. 1644–1655 (2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
38.Wanatowski, D. and Chu, J., “Stress-Strain Behavior of a Granular Fill Measured by a New Plain-Strain Apparatus,” Geotechnical Testing Journal, 29(2), pp. 149–157(2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar