Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T22:14:34.987Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Unintended consequences: Why carbonation can dominate in microscale hydration of calcium silicates

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 August 2015

Nicola Ferralis ,
Deepak Jagannathan ,
Jeffrey C. Grossman  and
Krystyn J. Van Vliet
Nicola Ferralis*
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, USA
Deepak Jagannathan
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, USA
Jeffrey C. Grossman
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, USA
Krystyn J. Van Vliet*
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, USA
*
a)Address all correspondence to these authors. e-mail: [email protected]
b)e-mail: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

The initial microscale mechanisms and materials interfacial process responsible for hydration of calcium silicates are poorly understood even in model systems. The lack of a measured microscale chemical signature has confounded understanding of growth mechanisms and kinetics for microreaction volumes. Here, we use Raman and optical spectroscopies to quantify hydration and environmental carbonation of tricalcium silicates across length and time scales. We show via spatially resolved chemical analysis that carbonate formation during the initial byproduct in microscale reaction volumes is significant, even for subambient CO2 levels. We propose that the competition between carbonation and hydration is enhanced strongly in microscale reaction volumes by increased surface-to-volume ratio relative to macroscale volumes, and by increased concentration of dissolved Ca2+ ions under poor hydration conditions that promote evaporation. This in situ analysis provides the first direct correlation between microscale interfacial hydration and carbonation environments and chemically defined reaction products in cementitious materials.

Keywords

nucleation & growthRaman spectroscopysurface reaction
Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Materials Research , Volume 30 , Issue 16 , 28 August 2015 , pp. 2425 - 2433
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Van Vliet, K.J., Pellenq, R., Buehler, M., Grossman, J.C., Jennings, H., Ulm, F-J., and Yip, S.: Set in stone? A perspective on the concrete sustainability challenge. MRS Bull. 37, 395–402 (2012).Google Scholar
Amato, I.: Green cement: Concrete solutions. Nature 494, 300–301 (2013).Google Scholar
Allen, A., Thomas, J., and Jennings, H.: Composition and density of nanoscale calcium–silicate–hydrate in cement. Nat. Mater. 6, 311–316 (2007).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gartner, E., Young, J., Dadot, D., and Jawed, I.: Structure and Performance of Cement, 2nd ed. (Spoon, London, UK, 2002); pp. 57–113.Google Scholar
Bullard, J., Jennings, H., Livingston, R., Nonat, A., Scherer, G., Schweitzer, J., Scrivener, K., and Thomas, J.: Mechanisms of cement hydration. Cem. Concr. Res. 41, 1208–1223 (2011).Google Scholar
Yip, S. and Short, M.: Multiscale materials modeling at the mesoscale. Nat. Mater. 12, 774 (2013).Google Scholar
Gauffinet, S., Finot, E., Lesniewska, E., and Nonat, A.: Direct observation of the growth of calcium silicate hydrate on alite and silica surfaces by atomic force microscopy. Comptes Rendus de l’Academie des Sciences Series IIA Earth and Planetary Science 327, 231–236 (1998).Google Scholar
Garrault, S., Finot, E., Lesniewska, E., and Nonat, A.: Study of CSH growth on C3S surface during its early hydration. Mater. Struct. 38, 435–442 (2005).Google Scholar
Gartner, E., Kurtis, K., and Monteiro, P.: Proposed mechanism of CSH growth tested by soft X-ray microscopy. Cem. Concr. Res. 30, 817–822 (2000).Google Scholar
Juenger, M., Monteiro, P., Gartner, E., and Denbeaux, G.: A soft X-ray microscope investigation into the effects of calcium chloride on tricalcium silicate hydration. Cem. Concr. Res. 35, 19–25 (2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Juenger, M., Monteiro, P., and Gartner, E.: In situ imaging of ground granulated blast furnace slag hydration. J. Mater. Sci. 41, 7074–7081 (2006).Google Scholar
Haselbach, L.: Potential for carbon dioxide absorption in concrete. J. Environ. Eng. 135, 465–472 (2009).Google Scholar
Young, J., Berger, R., and Breese, J.: Accelerated curing of compacted calcium silicate mortars on exposure to CO2. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 57, 394–397 (1974).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rostami, V., Shao, Y., Boyd, A., and He, Z.: Microstructure of cement paste subject to early carbonation curing. Cem. Concr. Res. 42, 186 (2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garbev, K., Stemmermann, P., Black, L., Breen, C., Yarwood, J., and Gasharova, B.: Structural features of C–S–H(I) and its carbonation in air–A Raman spectroscopic study. Part I: Fresh phases. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 90, 900 (2007).Google Scholar
Black, L., Breen, C., Yarwood, J., Garbev, K., Stemmermann, P., and Gasharova, B.: Structural features of C–S–H(I) and its carbonation in air–A Raman spectroscopic study. Part II: Carbonated phases. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 90, 908–917 (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dubina, E., Korat, L., Black, L., Strupi-Suput, J., and Plank, J.: Influence of water vapour and carbon dioxide on free lime during storage at 80 °C, studied by Raman spectroscopy. Spectrochim. Acta, Part A 111, 299 (2013).Google Scholar
Severinghaus, J., Broecker, W., Dempster, W., MacCallum, T., and Wahlen, M.: Oxygen loss in biosphere 2. EOS Trans.: AGU 75, 33–40 (1994).Google Scholar
Pade, C. and Guimaraes, M.: The CO2 uptake of concrete in 100 year perspective. Cem. Concr. Res. 37, 1348–1356 (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andersson, R., Fridh, K., Stripple, H., and Haglund, M.: Calculating CO2 uptake for existing concrete structures during and after service life. Environ. Sci. Technol. 47, 11625 (2013).Google Scholar
Grossier, R., Hammadi, Z., Morin, R., Magnaldo, A., and Vessler, S.: Generating nanoliter to femtoliter microdroplets with ease. Appl. Phys. Lett. 98, 091916 (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
International Code Council: International Building Code, (2012).Google Scholar
Grossier, R. and Van Vliet, K.J.: Visualizing hydration products. Concrete Sustainability Hub Research Profile Letter. (MIT, Cambridge, MA, 2012).Google Scholar
Reuter, D., Gerth, G., and Kirschner, J.: Surface Diffusion, Vol. 360. (Plenum Press, New York, NY, 1997); p. 489.Google Scholar
Ferralis, N., El Gabaly, F., Schmid, A., Maboudian, R., and Carraro, C.: Real-time observation of reactive spreading of gold on silicon. Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 256102 (2009).Google Scholar
Black, L.: Raman spectroscopy of cementitious materials. Spectrosc. Prop. Inorg. Organomet. Compd. 40, 72–127 (2009).Google Scholar
Martınez-Ramırez, S. and Fernandez-Carrasco, L.: Construction and Building: Design, Materials, and Techniques, Chapter 10 (Nova Science Publishers, Hauppauge, NY, 2011).Google Scholar
Potgieter-Vermaak, S., Potgieter, J., and Van Grieken, R.: The application of Raman spectrometry to investigate and characterize cement, Part I: A review. Cem. Concr. Res. 36, 656–662 (2006).Google Scholar
Gallucci, E., Mathur, P., and Scrivener, K.: Microstructural development of early age hydration shells around cement grains. Cem. Concr. Res. 40, 4–13 (2010).Google Scholar
Morse, J. and Luttge, A.: Calcium carbonate formation and dissolution. Chem. Rev. 107, 342–381 (2007).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cebeci, U.: Pore structure of air-entrained hardened cement paste. Cem. Concr. Res. 11, 257 (1981).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cultrone, G., Sebastian, E., and Ortega Huertas, M.: Forced and natural carbonation of lime-based mortars with and without additives: Mineralogical and textural changes. Cem. Concr. Res. 35, 2278 (2005).Google Scholar
Berliner, R., Popovici, M., Herwig, K., Berliner, M., Jennings, H., and Thomas, J.: Quasielastic neutron scattering study of the effect of water-to-cement ratio on the hydration kinetics of tricalcium silicate. Cem. Concr. Res. 28, 231–243 (1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, J., Jennings, H., and Chen, J.: Influence of nucleation seeding on the hydration mechanisms of tricalcium silicate and cement. J. Phys. Chem. C 113, 4327–4334 (2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, J., Biernacki, J., Bullard, J., Bishnoi, S., Dolado, J., Scherer, G., and Luttge, A.: Modeling and simulation of cement hydration kinetics and microstructure development. Cem. Concr. Res. 41, 1257–1278 (2011).Google Scholar
Supplementary material: PDF

Ferralis supplementary material S1

Ferralis supplementary material

Download Ferralis supplementary material S1(PDF)
PDF 3.5 MB