Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T09:10:07.176Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Twinning and crystal slip in black monoclinic ZnP2

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 March 2011

Michael E. Fleet
Affiliation:
Department of Geology, University of Western Ontario, London, Ontario N6A 5B7, Canada
Joseph C. White
Affiliation:
Department of Geology, University of New Brunswick, P. O. Box 4400, Fredericton, New Brunswick E3B 5A3, Canada
Get access

Abstract

Monoclinic βZnP2 (black ZnP2) single crystals, synthesized in the presence of excess P, contain regions of polysynthetic lamellar-twinned structure, with dislocations and stacking fault-like features. The twin law is a* twin axis, (100) composition plane: (100) is also the slip plane. The twin composition plane migrates across (100) lattice fringes. In the revised βZnP2 crystal structure, Zn(1) and P(4) positions are related across a (100) twin composition plane at x = 0.84 by two twin operations, with axes through is also a possible slip plane, with three partial dislocations, ½[001], ½[001], and ½[001]. A third possible twin operation relates Zn(2) and P(1) positions across a (100) twin plane at x = 0.5, with twin axis through All twin and slip operations result in very little distortion in nearest- and nextnearest-neighbor coordination geometries. Twin and stacking fault mistakes may be facilitated by approach of the monoclinic cell parameter ratio c[α sin(βπ/2)] to 4 (which yields a pseudo-orthorhombic unit cell) and by Zn1-xP2 nonstoichiometry.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1986

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1Aleinikova, K. B., Rabotkina, N. S., Arsenov, A. V., and Zavalishin, E. I., in Proceedings of the 1st International Symposium on Physics and Chemistry of II-V Compounds, edited by Gelten, M. J. and Zdanowicz, L. (Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, The Netherlands, 1980), pp. 39–2.Google Scholar
2Fleet, M. E., Acta Crystallogr. B 30, 122 (1974).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3Fleet, M. E. and Mowles, T. A., Acta Crystallogr. C 40, 1778 (1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4Shevchenko, V. Ya., in Ref. 1, pp. 1532.Google Scholar
5Hegyi, I. J., Loebner, E. E., Poor, E. W. Jr., and White, J. G., J. Phys. Chem. Solids 24, 333 (1963).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6Stackelberg, M. and Paulus, R., Z. Phys. Chem. B 28, 427 (1935).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7Sysoev, B. I., Aleinikova, K. B., Bityutskaya, L. A., Synorov, V. F., and Ugai, Ya. A., in Protessy Rosta I Sinteza Poluprovodn. Kristallov I Plenok, edited by Aleksandrov, L. N. and Kuznetsov, F. A. (Akademii Nauk SSSR, Novosibirsk, 1975), Vol. 2, pp. 252255.Google Scholar
8Olofsson, O., Acta Chem. Scand. 19, 229 (1965).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9Sheleg, A. U. and Zaretzskii, V. V., Fiz. Tverd. Tela (Leningrad) 25, 3174 (1983).Google Scholar
10Senko, M. E., Dunn, H. M., Weidenborner, J., and Cole, H., Acta Crystallogr. 12, 76 (1959).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11Sirota, N. N., Antyukohov, A. M., and Smolyarenko, E. M., Izv. Akad. Nauk SSSR, Neorg. Mater. 13, 358 (1977).Google Scholar
12Mowles, T. A., Ph.D. thesis, University of California at Berkeley, 1981.Google Scholar