Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-4rdpn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-18T01:24:05.788Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Tungsten wire for incandescent lamps

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2011

John L. Walter  and
Clyde L. Briant
John L. Walter
Affiliation:
General Electric Corporate Research and Development, Schenectady, New York 12301
Clyde L. Briant
Affiliation:
General Electric Corporate Research and Development, Schenectady, New York 12301
Get access

Abstract

Tungsten wire for incandescent lamp filaments must operate at high temperatures and for long times. To meet these requirements, the grain morphology of the wire must be controlled to reduce the propensity for grain boundary sliding. The morphology is a function of the distribution of very small pockets of potassium in the wire and the mechanical processing from ingot to wire. The behavior of the filament is directly related to the grain morphology. This paper describes the mechanism by which the potassium is incorporated into and distributed in the ingot. The elongation and spheroidization of the bubbles during hot rolling and swaging are also examined and related to the grain morphology of wire. Some indications of the relationship between grain morphology and filament behavior are also given.

Type
Commentaries and Reviews
Information
Journal of Materials Research , Volume 5 , Issue 9 , September 1990 , pp. 2004 - 2022
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1Walter, J. L. and Lou, K. A., J. Mater. Sci. 24, 3577 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2Haubner, R., Schubert, W. D., Hellmer, H., Lassner, E., and Lux, B., Proc. 11th Plansee Seminar 2, 161 (1985).Google Scholar
3Haubner, R., Schubert, W. D., Lassner, E., and Lux, B., ibid., p. 69.Google Scholar
4Walter, J. L., Lou, K. A., and Vukcevich, M. R., Proc. 12th Plansee Seminar 1, 493 (1989).Google Scholar
5Walter, J. L., Rao, P., and Russell, R. R., Metall. Trans. A 6A, 1775 (1975).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6Briant, C. L. and Walter, J. L., Proc. 12th Plansee Seminar 1, 151 (1989).Google Scholar
7Rayleigh, Lord, Proc. London Math. Soc. 10, 4 (1878).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8Moon, D. M., Stickler, R., and Wolfe, A. L., Proc. 6th Plansee Seminar, 67 (1968).Google Scholar
9Snow, D. B., Metall. Trans. A 7A, 783 (1976).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10Walter, J. L., Trans. TMS-AIME 239, 272 (1967).Google Scholar
11Briant, C. L. and Walter, J. L., Acta Metall. 36, 2503 (1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12Walter, J. L., Briant, C. L., and Koch, E. F., Metall. Trans. A 13A, 1501 (1982).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13Walter, J. L., J. Applied Phys. 60, 3343 (1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14Walter, J. L. and Koch, E. F., to be published in J. Mater. Sci.Google Scholar
15Kehman, L. R., Wilkinson, W. D., and Yagge, F. L., Argonne Nat. Lab. Report ANL-4417 (1950).Google Scholar
16Raj, R. and Ashby, M. F., Metall. Trans. 2, 1113 (1971).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17Adam, P. and Wever, H., Surf. Sci. 21, 307 (1970).CrossRefGoogle Scholar