Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-29T15:58:07.501Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Third-order nonlinear optical properties of the Na2S–PbS–GeS2 sulfide glasses and the Na2S–PbO–GeS2 oxysulfide glasses

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2011

Zhong Hua Zhou
Affiliation:
Department of Chemistry for Materials, Faculty of Engineering, Mie University, Kamihama, Tsu, Mie 514, Japan
Hiroyuki Nasu*
Affiliation:
Department of Chemistry for Materials, Faculty of Engineering, Mie University, Kamihama, Tsu, Mie 514, Japan
Tadanori Hashimoto
Affiliation:
Department of Chemistry for Materials, Faculty of Engineering, Mie University, Kamihama, Tsu, Mie 514, Japan
Kanichi Kamiya
Affiliation:
Department of Chemistry for Materials, Faculty of Engineering, Mie University, Kamihama, Tsu, Mie 514, Japan
*
a)Address all correspondence to this author. e-mail: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

The third-order optical nonlinearity of glasses of the Na2S–PbS–GeS2 and Na2S–PbO–GeS2 systems was measured by third-harmonic generation method. The third-order nonlinearities of glasses of both systems increase with the increasing lead content. The maximum value of the third-order optical nonlinearity was 3.00 × 10-12 esu. The addition of PbO basically has little influence on third-order optical nonlinearity, and the largest nonlinearity is 1.49 × 10-12 esu. The minimum appearing at 15 mol% PbO can be explained by the decrease of number density of lead and sulfur. Chemical durability of oxysulfide glasses is superior to that of a pure sulfide system; thus the addition of PbO is important in this sense.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1.Nasu, H., Ibara, Y., and Kubodera, K., J. Non-Cryst. Solids 110, 229 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.Vogel, E. M., Weber, M. J., and Krol, D. M., Phys. Chem. Glasses 32, 231 (1991).Google Scholar
3.Nasu, H., Kubodera, K., Kobayasi, M., Nakamura, M., and Kamiya, K., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 73, 1794 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.Borrelli, N. F., Aitken, B.G., and Newhouse, M.A., J. Non-Cryst. Solids 185, 109 (1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5.Yamamoto, H., Kamiya, K., Matsuoka, J., and Nasu, H., J. Ceram. Soc. Jpn. 101, 974 (1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6.Zhou, Z. H., Nasu, H., Hashimoto, T., and Kamiya, K., J. Non-Cryst. Solids 215, 61 (1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7.Wang, C. C., Phys. Rev. B 2, 2045 (1970).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8.Borrelli, N. F. and Hall, D. W., in Optical Properties of Glass, edited by Uhlmann, D. R. and Kreidl, N. J. (American Ceramic Society, Westerville, OH, 1991), p. 87.Google Scholar
9.Sugimoto, O., Nasu, H., Matsuoka, J., and Kamiya, K., J. Non-Cryst. Solids 162, 118 (1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar