Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-4rdpn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-07T20:16:08.611Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A thermodynamic and kinetic basis for understanding metastable phase formation during ion-beam mixing of nickel-aluminum alloys

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2011

James Eridon ,
Gary S. Was  and
Lynn Rehn
James Eridon
Affiliation:
Department of Nuclear Engineering, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109
Gary S. Was
Affiliation:
Department of Nuclear Engineering, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109
Lynn Rehn
Affiliation:
Argonne National Laboratory, Materials Science and Technology Division, Argonne, Illinois 60439
Get access

Abstract

A quantitative thermodynamic explanation for the formation of metastable phases in the nickel-aluminum alloy system through heavy-ion irradiation is presented. The role of kinetics in the transformation to a metastable state is also investigated. Experiments involved the irradiation of both layered nickel-aluminum samples and ordered intermetallic compounds with 500 keV krypton ions over a range of temperatures and compositions. Samples were formed by alternate evaporation of layers of nickel and aluminum. A portion of these samples was subsequently annealed to form intermetallic compounds. Irradiations were performed at both room temperature and 80 K using the 2 MV ion accelerator at Argonne National Laboratory. Phase transformations were observed during both in situ irradiations in the high-voltage electron microscope at Argonne and also in subsequent electron diffraction analyses of an array of irradiated samples. Metastable phases formed included disordered crystalline structures, an amorphous structure, and a hexagonal-close-packed structure. These phase structures were modeled using the embedded atom method to compute heats of transformation ΔHs–ms from stable to metastablestates. It was found that metastable states that have moderate heats of transformation, ΔHs–ms ≍ 15%–20% of the heat of formation of the stable phase, form under irradiation. Metastable states with high heats of transformation, ΔHs–ms ≍ 50% of the heat of formation of the stable phase, do not form under irradiation. Kinetics also play an important role in determining the effect of temperature and initial structure on the formation of metastable phases.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Materials Research , Volume 3 , Issue 4 , August 1988 , pp. 626 - 639
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1Phase Transformations During Irradiation, edited by Nolfl, F. V. Jr. (Applied Science, New York, 1983).Google Scholar
2Phase Stability During Irradiation, edited by Holland, J. R.Mansur, L. K. and Potter, D. I. (Metallurgical Society of AIME, New York, 1981).Google Scholar
3Machlin, E. S. and Rowland, T. J. in Synthesis and Properties of Meta-stable Phases (American Institute for Mining, Metallurgical, and Petroleum Engineers, New York, 1980).Google Scholar
4Swanson, M. L.Parsons, J. R. and Hoelke, C. W.Radiat. Eff. 9, 249 (1971).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5Brimhall, J. L.Kissinger, H. E. and Chariot, L. A.Radiat. Eff. 77, 237 (1983).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6Hung, L. S.Nastasi, M.Gyulai, J. and Mayer, J. W.Appl. Phys. Lett. 42, 672 (1983).Google Scholar
7Luzzi, D. E.Mori, H.Fujita, H. and Meshii, M.Acta Metall. 34, 629 (1986).Google Scholar
8Naguib, H. M. and Kelly, R.Radiat. Eff. 25, 1 (1975).Google Scholar
9Johnson, W. L.Cheng, Y. T.Rossum, M. van, Nicolet, M. A. and Nicolet, A.Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. B 7/8, 657 (1985).Google Scholar
10Potter, D. I. and Ryding, D. G.J. Nucl. Mater. 71, 14 (1977).Google Scholar
11Potter, D. I. and McCormick, A. W.Acta Metall. 27, 933 (1979).Google Scholar
12Potter, D. I. and Hoff, H. A.Acta Metall. 24, 1155 (1976).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13Kirchner, L. G.Smidt, F. A.Kulcinski, G. L.Sprague, J. A. and Westmoreland, J. E. in Irradiation Effects on the Microstructure and Properties of Metals (American Society for Testing Materials, Philadelphia, PA, 1976), p. 370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14Ro, H. and Mitchell, T. E.Metall. Trans. 9A, 1749 (1978).Google Scholar
15Ahmed, M. and Potter, D. I.Acta Metall. 33, 2221 (1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16Delafond, J.Jaouen, C.Riviere, J. P. and Fayoux, C.Mater. Sci. Eng. 69, 117 (1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17Johnson, E.Sarholt-Kristensen, L., and Johansen, A.Nucl. Instrum. Methods 209/210, 289 (1983).Google Scholar
18Bykov, V. N.Troyan, V. A.Zdorovtseva, G. G. and Khaimo-vich, V. S., Phys. Status Solidi A 32, 53 (1975).Google Scholar
19Wyckoff, R. W. G.Crystal Structures (Wiley, New York, 1963), 2nd ed., Vol. 1, p. 12.Google Scholar
20Nastasi, M.Johnson, H. H. and Mayer, J. W.J. Mater. Res. 1, 268 (1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
21Daw, M. S. and Baskes, M. I.Phys. Rev. B 29, 6443 (1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
22Hultgren, R.Desai, P. D.Hawkins, D. T.Gleiser, M. and Kelley, K. K.Selected Values of the Thermodynamic Properties of Binary Alloys (American Society for Metals, Metals Park, OH, 1973).Google Scholar
23Eridon, J. M. and Was, G. S.Nucl. Instrum. Methods B 12, 505 (1985).Google Scholar
24Faigel, G. and Svab, E. in Rapidly Quenched Metals, edited by Steib, S. and Warlimont, H. (Elsevier, New York, 1985), p. 487.Google Scholar
25Busch, G. and Schade, H.Lectures on Solid State Physics (Pergamon, New York, 1976), p. 77.Google Scholar
26Waseda, Y.Okazaki, H. and Masumoto, T.J. Mater. Sci. 12, 1927 (1977).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
27Chaudhari, P. and Turnbull, D.Science 199, 4324 (1978).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
28Ichikawa, T.Phys. Status Solidi A 29, 293 (1975).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
29Castleman, L. S. and Seigle, L. L.TMS-AIME 212, 589 (1958).Google Scholar
30Janssen, M. M. P.Metall. Trans. 4, 1623 (1973).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
31Hirvonen, J.Appl. Phys. 23, 349 (1980).Google Scholar
32Altounian, Z.Guohua, T., and Strom-Olsen, J. O., J. Appl. Phys. 54, 3111 (1983).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
33Altounian, Z.Strom-Olsen, J. O., and Walter, J. L.J. Appl. Phys. 55, 1566 (1984).Google Scholar
34Ruppersberg, H.Lee, D. and Wagner, C. N. J.J. Phys. F: Met. Phys. 10, 1645 (1980).Google Scholar
35Follstaedt, D. M.Nucl. Instrum. Methods B 7/8, 11 (1985).Google Scholar
36Rose, J. H.Smith, J. R.Guinea, F. and Ferrante, J.Phys. Rev. B 29, 2963 (1984).Google Scholar
37Foiles, S. M.Sandia Report SAND85-8772, Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, New Mexico.Google Scholar
38Clementi, E. and Roetti, C.Atomic and Nuclear Data Tables (Academic, New York, 1974), Vol. 14.Google Scholar
39Baskes, M. I. and Melius, C. F.Phys. Rev. B 20, 3197 (1979).Google Scholar