Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-mlc7c Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T06:31:36.998Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Thermal stresses in multilevel interconnections: Aluminum lines at different levels

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2011

Y-L. Shen
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering, The University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico 87131
Get access

Abstract

Numerical results on the evolution of thermal stresses in multilevel interconnects are presented. Two levels of aluminum lines with an aspect ratio of unity, aligned vertically or arranged in a staggered manner, are considered by recourse to the finite element analysis. The stresses are found to be significantly higher in the lower-level lines than in the upper-level lines, for both the aligned and staggered arrangements. The stress magnitudes are generally smaller in lines of staggered arrangement, compared to the case of aligned lines. Implications of the present findings are discussed, with directions of future studies highlighted.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1.Flinn, P. A., Mack, A. S., Besser, P. R., and Marieb, T. N., MRS Bull. 18 (12), 26 (1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.Lloyd, J. R., in Materials Reliability in Microelectronics V, edited by Oates, A. S., Filter, W. F., Rosenberg, R., Greer, A. L., and Gadepally, K.(Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 391, Pittsburgh, PA, 1995), p. 231.Google Scholar
3.Sauter, A. I. and Nix, W. D., IEEE Trans. Comp. Hybrids Manufact. Technol. 15, 594 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.Greenebaum, B., Sauter, A. I., Flinn, P. A., and Nix, W. D., Appl. Phys. Lett. 58, 1845 (1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5.Chidambarrao, D., Rodbell, K. P., Thouless, M. D., and DeHaven, P. W., in Materials Reliability in Microelectronics IV, edited by Børgesen, P., Coburn, J. C., Sanchez, J. E., Jr., Rodbell, K. P., and Filter, W. F. (Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 338, Pittsburgh, PA, 1994), p. 261.Google Scholar
6.Flinn, P. A. and Chiang, C., J. Appl. Phys. 67, 2927 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7.Yeo, I-S., Anderson, S. G. H., Ho, P. S., and Hu, C. K., J. Appl. Phys. 78, 953 (1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8.Shen, Y-L., J. Appl. Phys. (in press).Google Scholar
9. ABAQUS, Version 5.4, general purpose finite element program, Hibbit, Karlson and Sorensen, Inc., Pawtucket, RI (1995).Google Scholar
10.Shen, Y-L., Suresh, S., and Blech, I. A., J. Appl. Phys. 80, 1388 (1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11. The Si single crystal has anisotropic elastic properties. In the calculations Si is assumed to be isotropic with the Young modulus and the Poisson ratio taken to be those along the [100] crystallographic direction. The error induced by this isotropy assumption has been found to be negligible (see Ref. 10).Google Scholar
12. The fact that the stress component σzz is affected strongly by the line arrangement can be clearly seen from this study. For instance, in the aligned two-level structure, σzz is significantly greater than σyy in the lower-level lines; in other cases the differences are not as large. In most cases considered in this study, σzz is greater than σyy. This seems to be inconsistent with intuitive expectation. However, it should be noticed that the two transverse components of stress in Al lines depend strongly on factors such as line aspect ratio, line spacing, and passivation thickness. It has, in fact, been shown (e.g., in Ref. 3) that σzz σyy in a passivated Al line under certain geometrical conditions.Google Scholar