Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T11:59:51.125Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Thermal expansion of nano–boron carbide under constant DC electric field: An in situ energy dispersive X-ray diffraction study using a synchrotron probe

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 January 2020

Hülya Biçer*
Affiliation:
Department of Metallurgy and Materials Engineering, Kütahya Dumlupınar University, Kütahya 43000, Turkey; and Department of Materials Science & Engineering, Rutgers University, Piscataway, New Jersey 08904, USA
Enver Koray Akdoğan
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science & Engineering, Rutgers University, Piscataway, New Jersey 08904, USA
İlyas Şavklıyıldız
Affiliation:
Deparment of Metallurgy and Materials Engineering, Konya Technical University, Konya 42250 Turkey
Christopher Haines
Affiliation:
US Army Research Laboratory, Aberdeen Proving Ground, Adelphi, Maryland 21005, USA
Zhong Zhong
Affiliation:
National Synchrotron Light Source I & II, Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, New York 11973, USA
Thomas Tsakalakos
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science & Engineering, Rutgers University, Piscataway, New Jersey 08904, USA
*
a)Address all correspondence to this author. e-mail: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

The thermal expansion coefficient (TEC) of nano-B4C having 50 nm mean particle size was measured as a function of applied direct current (DC) electric field strength varying from 0 to 12.7 V/mm and over a temperature range from 298 K up to 1273 K. The TEC exhibits a linear variation with temperature despite being measured over a range that is well below 50% of B4C’s normal melting temperature. The zeroth- and first-order TEC coefficients under zero-field condition are 4.8220 ± 0.009 × 10−6 K−1 and 1.462 ± 0.004 × 10−9 K−1, respectively. Both TECs exhibit applied DC electric field dependence. The higher the applied field strength, the steeper the linear thermal expansion response in nano-B4C, which suggests that the applied field affects the curvature of the interatomic potentials at the equilibrium bond length at a given temperature. No anisotropic thermal expansion with and without applied electric field was observed, although nano-B4C has a rhombohedral unit cell symmetry. The rhombohedral unit cell angle was determined as δR= 65.7046° (0.0007), and it remains unaffected by a change in temperature and applied electric field strength, which we attribute to B4C nanoparticle size and its carbon saturation.

Type
Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2020 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Kittel, C.: Introduction to Solid State Physics, 8th ed. (John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY, 2005).Google Scholar
Newnham, R.E.: Properties of Materials (Oxford University Press, Oxford, U.K., 2005).Google Scholar
Domnich, V., Reynaud, S., Haber, R.A., and Chhowalla, M.: Boron carbide: Structure, properties, and stability under stress. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 94, 36053628 (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andrievski, R.A.: Micro- and nanosized boron carbide: Synthesis, structure and properties. Russ. Chem. Rev. 81, 549559 (2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vast, N., Sjakste, J., and Betranhandy, E.: Boron carbides from first principles. J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 176, 012002 (2009).Google Scholar
Suri, A.K., Subramanian, C., Sonber, J.K., and Murthy, T.C.: Synthesis and consolidation of boron carbide: A review. Int. Mater. Rev. 55, 440 (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wood, C. and Emin, D.: Conduction mechanism in boron carbide. Phys. Rev. B 29, 4582 (1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matchen, B.: Applications of ceramics in armor products. Key Eng. Mater. 122, 333344 (1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vargas-Gonzalez, L., Speyer, R.F., and Campbell, J.: Flexural strength, fracture toughness, and hardness of silicon carbide and boron carbide armor ceramics. Int. J. Appl. Ceram. Technol. 7, 643651 (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Emin, D. and Aselage, T.L.: A proposed boron-carbide-based solid-state neutron detector. J. Appl. Phys. 97, 013529 (2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barney, W.K., Sehmel, G.A., and Seymour, W.E.: The use of boron carbide for reactor control. Nucl. Sci. Eng. 4, 439448 (1958).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cullity, B.D.: Elements of X-ray Diffraction, 2nd ed. (Adisson-Wesley Publishing, USA, 1978).Google Scholar
Aselage, T.L. and Tissot, R.G.: Lattice constants of boron carbides. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 75, 22072212 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thevenot, F.: Boron carbide—A comprehensive review. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 6, 205225 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lipp, A.: Boron Carbide: Production, Properties, and Applications, Battelle Northwest Laboratories, NTIS Issue Number 197013, 1970.Google Scholar
Pilladi, T.R., Panneerselvam, G., Anthonysamy, S., and Ganesan, V.: Thermal expansion of nanocrystalline boron carbide. Ceram. Int. 38, 37233728 (2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guillon, O., Gonzalez-Julian, J., Dargatz, B., Kessel, T., Schierning, G., Räthel, J., and Herrmann, M.: Field-assisted sintering technology/spark plasma sintering: Mechanisms, materials, and technology developments. Adv. Eng. Mater. 16, 830849 (2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anselmi-Tamburini, U., Munir, Z.A., Kodera, Y., Imai, T., and Ohyanagi, M.: Influence of synthesis temperature on the defect structure of boron carbide: Experimental and modeling studies. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 88, 13821387 (2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yang, D., Raj, R., and Conrad, H.: Enhanced sintering rate of zirconia (3Y-TZP) through the effect of a weak dc electric field on grain growth. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 93, 29352937 (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Akdoğan, E.K., Şavklıyıldız, İ., Biçer, H., Paxton, W., Toksoy, F., Zhong, Z., and Tsakalakos, T.: Anomalous lattice expansion in yttria stabilized zirconia under simultaneous applied electric and thermal fields: A time-resolved in situ energy dispersive X-ray diffractometry study with an ultrahigh energy synchrotron probe. J. Appl. Phys. 113, 233503 (2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holland, T.J.B. and Redfern, S.A.T.: Unit cell refinement from powder diffraction data: The use of regression diagnostics. Mineral. Mag. 61, 6577 (1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waseda, Y., Matsubara, E., and Shinobada, K.: X-ray Diffraction Crystallography (Springer, New York, 2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nye, J.F.: Physical Properties of Crystals (Oxford University Press, Oxford, U.K., 1985).Google Scholar
Balakrishnarajan, M.M., Pancharatna, P.D., and Hoffmann, R.: Structure and bonding in boron carbide: The invincibility of imperfections. New J. Chem. 31, 473 (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yakel, H.L.: Lattice expansions of two boron carbides between 12 and 940 °C. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 6, 471 (1973).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Born, M. and Huang, K.: Dynamical Theory of Crystal Lattices (Clarendon Press, Wotton-Under-Edge, 1998).Google Scholar
Haines, C., Akdoğan, E.K., and Tsakalakos, T.. Private communication (2019).Google Scholar
Snyder, R.L.: The Rietveld Method, Young, R.A., ed. (Oxford University Press, New York, NY, 1993); pp. 111131.Google Scholar
Jade (Materials Data Inc., Livermore, California, 2019).Google Scholar