Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T04:09:28.818Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A technique for determining coefficients of the “stress–strain” diagram by nanoscratch test results

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 August 2014

Sergey V. Smirnov  and
Evgeniya O. Smirnova
Sergey V. Smirnov*
Affiliation:
Institute of Engineering Science, Russian Academy of Science (Ural Branch), Ekaterinburg 620049, Russia
Evgeniya O. Smirnova
Affiliation:
Institute of Engineering Science, Russian Academy of Science (Ural Branch), Ekaterinburg 620049, Russia
*
a)Address all correspondence to this author. e-mail: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

A technique has been developed for determining coefficients in the power approximation of the “stress–strain” diagram by results of scratch testing with a Berkovich indenter under a normal load of 5 mN on the indenter. The procedure is based on a comparison of experimental results with the finite element simulation of the test process. The technique is intended for application on nanomechanical testing equipment enabling one to perform tests with recording of loading diagrams in terms of the “normal force – indenter displacement” coordinates. To obtain correct results, one must observe the following restrictions: indenter penetration depth > 150 nm under a loading of 5 mN with the indenter tip curvature radius R < 50 nm; indenter penetration depth > 250 nm with 50 < R < 100 nm; the tested metal must be ductile enough, for a scratch to be formed by the mechanism of plastic deformation rather than fracture.

Keywords

nanoindentationalloystress/strain relationship
Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Materials Research , Volume 29 , Issue 16 , 28 August 2014 , pp. 1730 - 1736
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Cheng, Y-T. and Cheng, C-M.: Can stress–strain relationships be obtained from indentation curves using conical and pyramidal indenters?. J. Mater. Res. 14(09), 3493 (2011).Google Scholar
Gouldstone, A., Chollacoop, N., Dao, M., Li, J., Minor, A., and Shen, Y.: Indentation across size scales and disciplines: Recent developments in experimentation and modeling. Acta Mater. 55(12), 4015 (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dao, M., Chollacoop, N., Van Vliet, K.J., Venkatesh, T.A., and Suresh, S.: Computational modeling of the forward and reverse problems in instrumented sharp indentation. Acta Mater. 49(19), 3899 (2001).Google Scholar
Farrissey, L.M. and McHugh, P.E.: Determination of elastic and plastic material properties using indentation: Development of method and application to a thin surface coating. Mater. Sci. Eng., A 399(1–2), 254 (2005).Google Scholar
Giannakopoulos, A.E. and Suresh, S.: Determination of elastoplastic properties by instrumented sharp indentation. Scr. Mater. 40(10), 1191 (1999).Google Scholar
Harsono, E., Swaddiwudhipong, S., and Liu, Z.S.: Material characterization based on simulated spherical-Berkovich indentation tests. Scr. Mater. 60(11), 972 (2009).Google Scholar
Li, M., Chen, W.M., Liang, N.G., and Wang, L.D.: A numerical study of indentation using indenters of different geometry. J. Mater. Res. 19(1), 73 (2004).Google Scholar
Ogasawara, N., Chiba, N., and Chen, X.: Measuring the plastic properties of bulk materials by single indentation test. Scr. Mater. 54(1), 65 (2006).Google Scholar
Smirnov, S.V. and Shveikin, V.P.: Evaluation of strain-hardening diagrams for individual structure constituents in multicomponent systems. Phys. Met. Metallogr. 80, 98 (1995).Google Scholar
Tabor, D.: The Hardness of Metals (Clarendon Press, Oxford, UK, 1951).Google Scholar
Venkatesh, T.A., Van Vliet, K.J., Giannakopoulos, A.E., and Suresh, S.: Determination of elasto-plastic properties by instrumented sharp indentation: Guidelines for property extraction. Scr. Mater. 42(9), 833 (2000).Google Scholar
Bouzakis, K.D., Michailidis, N., Hadjiyiannis, S., Skordaris, G., and Erkens, G.: The effect of specimen roughness and indenter tip geometry on the determination accuracy of thin hard coatings stress–strain laws by nanoindentation. Mater. Charact. 49(2), 149 (2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gouldstone, A., Koh, H.J., Zeng, K.Y., Giannakopoulos, A.E., and Suresh, S.: Discrete and continuous deformation during nanoindentation of thin films. Acta Mater. 48(9), 2277 (2000).Google Scholar
Pelletier, H., Krier, J., Cornet, A., and Mille, P.: Limits of using bilinear stress-strain curve for finite element modeling of nanoindentation response on bulk materials. Thin Solid Films 379(1–2), 147 (2000).Google Scholar
Fedosov, S.A. and Pešek, L.: Determining Mechanical Properties of Materials by Microindentation: Modern Foreign Methods (Faculty of Physics of MSU, Moscow, Russia, 2004).Google Scholar
Johnson, K.L.: Contact Mechanics (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 1985), p. 456.Google Scholar
Milman, Y.V., Galanov, B.A., and Chugunova, S.I.: Plasticity characteristic obtained through hardness measurement. Acta Metall. Mater. 41(9), 2523 (1993).Google Scholar