Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-pfhbr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-08T12:56:03.789Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Synthesis and properties of strontium-doped yttrium manganite

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 March 2011

Bo Fu ,
Wayne Huebner ,
Mladen F. Trubelja  and
Vladimir S. Stubican
Bo Fu
Affiliation:
Department of Ceramic Engineering, The University of Missouri at Rolla, Rolla, Missouri 65401-0249
Wayne Huebner
Affiliation:
Department of Ceramic Engineering, The University of Missouri at Rolla, Rolla, Missouri 65401-0249
Mladen F. Trubelja
Affiliation:
Center for Advanced Materials, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania 16802
Vladimir S. Stubican
Affiliation:
Center for Advanced Materials, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, Pennsylvania 16802
Get access

Abstract

The system Y1−xSrxMnO3 (x = 0.000, 0.005, 0.010, 0.050, and 0.100) was studied as a potential cathode material for solid oxide fuel cells. Powders were prepared using an organometallic precursor; however, achieving homogeneous compositions was complicated due to the presence of intermediate, metastable phases. The desired hexagonal Y1−xSrxMnO3 phase formed from the precursor at 800 °C, while small amounts of a metastable orthorhombic (Y,Sr)MnO3 phase formed in the temperature range between 850°and 960 °C, and another orthorhombic YMn2O5 phase between 840°and 1200 °C. The metastable (Y, Sr)MnO3 phase readily transformed into the stable hexagonal phase at about 960 °C. The other metastable intermediate phase, YMn2O5, was formed as a decomposition product of a portion of the major hexagonal YMnO3 at 840 °C, and subsequently reacted with Y2O3 back to the hexagonal YMnO3 at 1200 °C. For the studied compositions, densities higher than 95% theoretical could be obtained by sintering in air at temperatures above 1400 °C for 2 h. The investigated system was comparable in electrical conductivity with the current cathode material La1−xSrxMnO3, and had an average apparent thermal expansion coefficient between 5 and 7 ppm/°C in the temperature range between 200°and 1000 °C. Unfortunately microcracking was observed in all sintered specimens, possibly caused by a high-temperature phase transition between the hexagonal and cubic polymorphs of Y1−xSrxMnO3. The microcracking presents a major obstacle to the use of this material as a cathode in solid oxide fuel cells.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Materials Research , Volume 9 , Issue 10 , October 1994 , pp. 2645 - 2653
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1Minh, N. Q., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 73 (3), 563–588 (1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2Kendall, K., Am. Ceram. Soc. Bull. 70 (7), 1159–1160 (1991).Google Scholar
3Kuo, J. H., Anderson, H. U., and Sparlin, D. M., J. Solid State Chem. 87, 55–63 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4Tedmon, C. S., Spacil, H. S., and Mitoff, S. P., J. Electrochem. Soc. 116, 1170–1175 (1969).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5Yokokawa, H., Sakai, N., Kawada, T., and Dokiya, M., Solid State Ionics 40/41, 398–401 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6Yamamoto, O., Takeda, Y., Kanno, R., and Noda, M., Solid State Ionics 22, 241–246 (1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7Stubican, V. S., Corman, G. S., Hellmann, J. R., and Senft, G., in Advances in Ceramics, Vol. 12, Science and Technology of Zirconia II, edited by Claussen, N., Rühle, M., and Heuer, A. H. (The American Ceramic Society, Inc., Westerville, OH, 1984), pp. 96–106.Google Scholar
8Yakel, H. L., Koehler, W. C., Bertaut, E. F., and Forrat, E. F., Acta Crystallogr. 16, 957–962 (1963).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9Bertaut, E. F., Z. Angew. Phys. 21 (4), 259–268 (1966) (in German).Google Scholar
10Numerical Data and Functional Relationships in Science and Technology, Landolt–Börnstein New Series, edited by Kellwege, K. H., Group III/3, Ferro- and Antiferroelectric Substances (Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1969), pp. 94–95.Google Scholar
11Roginskaya, Y. E., Venevtsev, Y. N., and Zhdanov, G. S., Sov. Phys. JETP 21 (5), 817–822 (1964).Google Scholar
12Peuzin, J. C., Solid State Commun. 5, 13–16 (1967) (in French).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13Bokov, V. A., Smolenskii, G. A., Kizhaev, S. S., and Mylnikova, I. E., Sov. Phys.–Solid State 5 (12), 2646–2647 (1964).Google Scholar
14Bertaut, E. F., Pauthenet, R., and Mercier, M., Phys. Lett. 7 (2), 110–111 (1963) (in French).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15Tamura, H., Sawaguchi, E., and Kikuchi, A., Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 4, 621–622 (1965).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16Kizhaev, S. A., Bokov, V. A., and Kachalov, O. V., Sov. Phys.–Solid State 8 (1), 215–216 (1966).Google Scholar
17Evans, B. J. and Peacor, D. R., J. Solid State Chem. 7, 36–39 (1973).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18Pechini, M. P., U.S. Patent No. 3330 697 (1967).Google Scholar
19McCarthy, G.J., Gallagher, P. V., and Sipe, C., Mater. Res. Bull. VIII, 1277–1284 (1973).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
20Prokudina, S. A., Rubinichik, Y. S., and Pavlyuchenko, M. M., Izv. Acad. Nauk SSSR, Neorg. Mater. 12 (4), 698–703 (1976).Google Scholar
21Szabo, G. and Parisl, R. A., C.R. Acad. Sci. 268C, 513–516 (1969) (in French).Google Scholar
22Waltnal, A. and Chenavas, H., C.R. Acad. Sci. 264B, 168–170 (1967) (in French).Google Scholar
23Pollert, E., Krupicka, S., and Kuzmicova, E., J. Phys. Chem. Solids 43 (12), 1137–1145 (1982).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
24Ismailzade, I. G. and Kizhaev, S. A., Sov. Phys.–Solid State 7 (1), 236–238 (1965).Google Scholar
25Bukaszewicz, K. and Kalicinska, J. K., Ferroelectrics 7, 81–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar