Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T13:23:54.313Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Synchrotron x-ray microbeam diffraction from abalone shell

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 March 2011

E. DiMasi  and
M. Sarikaya
E. DiMasi*
Affiliation:
Physics Department, Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, New York 11975
M. Sarikaya
Affiliation:
Materials Science and Engineering, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98195
*
a) Address all correspondence to this author. e-mail: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

Microstructured biomaterials such as mollusk shells receive much attention at present, due to the promise that advanced materials can be designed and synthesized with biomimetic techniques that take advantage of self-assembly and aqueous, ambient processing conditions. A satisfactory understanding of this process requires characterization of the microstructure not only in the mature biomaterial, but at the growth fronts where the control over crystal morphology and orientation is enacted. In this paper, we present synchrotron microbeam x-ray diffraction (XRD) and electron microscopy observations near the nacre–prismatic interface of red abalone shell. The relative orientations of calcite and aragonite grains exhibit some differences from the idealizations reported previously. Long calcite grains impinge the nacre–prismatic boundary at 45° angles, suggestive of nucleation on (104) planes followed by growth along the c axis. In the region within 100 μm of the boundary, calcite and aragonite crystals lose their bulk orientational order, but we found no evidence for qualitative changes in long-range order such as ideal powder texture or an amorphous structure factor. XRD rocking curves determined the mosaic of calcite crystals in the prismatic region to be no broader than the 0.3° resolution limit of the beamline’s capillary optics, comparable to what can be measured on geological calcite single crystals.

Keywords

BiomimeticMicrostructureX-ray diffraction (XRD)
Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Materials Research , Volume 19 , Issue 5 , May 2004 , pp. 1471 - 1476
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1Jackson, A.P., Vincent, J.F.V. and Turner, R.M., The mechanical design of nacre. Proc. R. Soc. London B 234,415 (1988).Google Scholar
2Sarikaya, M. and Aksay, I.A. Biomimetics: materials fabrication through biology, Biomimetics (American Institute of Physics, New York, 1992), pp. 34–85.Google Scholar
3Manne, S., Zaremba, C.M., Giles, R., Huggins, L., Walters, D.A., Belcher, A., Morse, D.E., Stucky, G.D., Didymus, J.M., Mann, S. and Hansma, P.K., Atomic force microscopy of the nacreous layer in mollusc shells. Proc. R. Soc. London B 256, 17 (1994).Google Scholar
4Schäffer, T.E., Ionescu-Zanetti, C., Proksch, R., Fritz, M., Walters, D.A., Almqvist, N., Zaremba, C.M., Belcher, A.M., Smith, B.L., Stucky, G.D., Morse, D.E. and Hansma, P.K., Does abalone nacre form by heteroepitaxial nucleation or by growth through mineral bridges? Chem. Mater. 9, 1731 (1997).Google Scholar
5Feng, Q.L., Cui, F.Z., Pu, G., Wang, R.Z. and Li, H.D., Crystal orientation, toughening mechanisms and a mimic of nacre. Mater. Sci. Eng., C 11, 19 (2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6Graham, T. and Sarikaya, M., Growth dynamics of red abalone shell: a biomimetic model. Mater. Sci. Eng., C 11, 145 (2000).Google Scholar
7Zolotoyabko, E. and Quintana, J.P., Non-destructive microstructural analysis with depth resolution: Application to seashells. J. Appl. Crystallogr. 35, 594 (2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8Fritz, M., Belcher, A.M., Radmacher, M., Walters, D.A., Hansma, P.K., Stucky, G.D., Morse, D.E. and Mann, S., Flat pearls from biofabrication of organized composites on inorganic substrates. Nature 371, 49 (1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9Zaremba, C.M., Belcher, A.M., Fritz, M., Li, Y., Mann, S., Hansma, P.K., Morse, D.E., Speck, J.S. and Stucky, G.D., Critical transitions in the biofabrication of abalone shells and flat pearls. Chem. Mater. 8, 679 (1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10Belcher, A.M., Wu, X.H., Christensen, R.J., Hansma, P.K., Stucky, G.D. and Morse, D.E., Control of crystal-phase switching and orientation by soluble mollusc-shell proteins. Nature 381, 56 (1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11Sarikaya, M. and Aksay, I.A. in Results and Problems in Cell Differentiation in Biopolymers, edited by Case, S.T., Nacre of abalone shell: a natural multifunctional nanolaminated ceramic-polymer composite material. (Springer, Amsterdam, 1992), pp. 1–25.Google Scholar
12Noyan, I.C., Kaldor, S.K., Wang, P-C. and Jordan-Sweet, J., A cost-effective method for minimizing the sphere-of-confusion error of x-ray microdiffractometers. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 70, 1300 (1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar