Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T05:21:22.419Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Surface segregation in a dilute copper–silver alloy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2011

S.W. Bronner
Affiliation:
Department of Metallurgical Engineering and Materials Science, Carnegie–Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213
P. Wynblatt
Affiliation:
Department of Metallurgical Engineering and Materials Science, Carnegie–Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213
Get access

Abstract

The equilibrium surface composition of a Cu-0.83 at. % Ag alloy has been studied over the range from 600°–400°C. Above 450°C the alloy consists of a single phase, whereas below that temperature the material separates into copper-rich and silver-rich phases. The kinetics of equilibration appear to be controlled by grain boundary diffusion, leading to more rapid equilibration than expected on the basis of lattice diffusion-controlled kinetics. In the single-phase regime, silver segregates to the surface with an average enthalpy of segregation of −24 kJ/mol and an entropy of segregation of 0.94 J/mol K, and displays a trend of increasing equilibrium silver surface concentration with decreasing temperature. Theoretical estimates of the enthalpy of segregation yield the somewhat more negative values of −60 and −47 kJ/mol, respectively. In the two-phase regime, the surface continues to be enriched in silver, but the silver surface concentration decreases with decreasing temperature as a result of the rapidly decreasing equilibrium solubility of silver in copper.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1986

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1Gibbs, J. W., The Scientific Papers of J. Williard Gibbs (Dover, New York, 1961), Vol. 1, p. 219.Google Scholar
2Wynblatt, P. and Steigerwald, D. A., Surface Modifications and Coatings, edited by Sisson, R. D. (American Society of Metals, Metals Park, OH, 1986), p. 327.Google Scholar
3Wynblatt, P. and Ku, R. C., Surf. Sci. 65, 511 (1977).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4Wynblatt, P. and Ku, R. C., Interfacial Segregation, edited by Johnson, W. C. and Blakely, J. M. (American Society of Metals, Metals Park, OH, 1979), p. 115.Google Scholar
5Kumar, V., Phys. Rev. B 23, 3756 (1981).Google Scholar
6Shelton, J. C., Patil, H. R., and Blakely, J. M., Surf. Sci. 43, 493 (1979).Google Scholar
7Seah, M. P., Practical Surface Analysis, edited by Briggs, D. and Seah, M. P. (Wiley, New York, 1983), p. 181.Google Scholar
8Ichimura, S. and Shimizu, R., Surf. Sci. 112, 386 (1981).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9Lea, C. and Seah, M. P., Philos. Mag. 35, 213 (1977).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10Mervyn, D. A., Baird, R. J., and Wynblatt, P., Surf. Sci. 82, 79 (1979).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11Butrymowicz, D. B., Manning, J. R., and Read, M. E., J. Phys. Chem. Ref. Data 3, 2544 (1974).Google Scholar
12Hondros, E. D., Precipitation Processes, edited by Russell, K. C. and Aaronson, H. I. (AIME, New York, 1978), p. 1.Google Scholar
13Hultgren, R., Desai, P. A., Hawkins, D. T., Gleiser, M., and Kelly, K. K., Selected Values of the Thermodynamic Properties of Binary Alloys (American Scoeity of Metals, Metals Park, OH, 1973).Google Scholar
14Geschneidner, K. A., Solid State Physics, edited by Seitz, F. and Turnbull, D. (Academic, New York, 1964), Vol. 16, p. 275.Google Scholar
15Foiles, S. M., Baskes, M. I., and Daw, M. S., Phys. Rev. B 33, 7983 (1986).Google Scholar
16Daw, M. S. and Baskes, M. I., Phys. Rev. Lett. 50, 1285 (1983)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daw, M. S. and Baskes, M. I.Phys. Rev. B 29, 6443 (1984).Google Scholar
17Metals Handbook, edited by Lyman, T. (American Society of Metals, Metals Park, OH, 1973), 8th ed., Vol. 8, p. 253.Google Scholar