Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T07:28:31.407Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Subcritical crack growth along epoxy/glass interfaces

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2011

K.M. Conley ,
J.E. Ritter  and
T.J. Lardner
K.M. Conley
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, Massachusetts 01003
J.E. Ritter
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, Massachusetts 01003
T.J. Lardner
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, Massachusetts 01003
Get access

Abstract

Subcritical crack growth behavior along polymer/glass interfaces was measured for various epoxy adhesives at different relative humidities. A four-point flexure apparatus coupled with an inverted microscope allowed for observation in situ of the subcritical crack growth at the polymer/glass interface. The specimens consisted of soda-lime glass plates bonded together with epoxy acrylate, epoxy (Devcon), or epoxy (Shell) adhesives. Above a threshold strain energy release rate, the subcritical crack velocity was dependent on the strain energy release rate via a power law relationship where the exponent was independent of the adhesive tested and the test humidity (n = 3). However, the multiplicative constant A in the power law relation varied by over three orders of magnitude between the various adhesives with epoxy (Shell) having the smallest value and the epoxy (Devcon) the greatest value; in addition, A was very sensitive to humidity, decreasing by over two orders of magnitude from 80% to 15% relative humidity. At high strain energy release rates, the subcritical crack velocity reached a plateau at approximately 10−6 m/s. The use of this subcritical crack velocity data in predicting thin film delamination is discussed.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Materials Research , Volume 7 , Issue 9 , September 1992 , pp. 2621 - 2629
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Ritter, J. E., Lardner, T. J., Rosenfeld, L., and Lin, M. R., J. Appl. Phys. 66 (8), 3626–3634 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.Lin, M. R., Ritter, J. E., Rosenfeld, L., and Lardner, T. J., J. Mater. Res. 5, 1110–1117 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.Rosenfeld, . G., Ritter, J. E., Lardner, T. J., and Lin, M. R., J. Appl. Phys. 67 (7), 3291–3296 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.Charalambides, P. G., Lund, J., McMeeking, R. M., and Evans, A. G., J. Appl. Mech. 56, 77–82 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5.Coa, H. C. and Evans, A. G., Mech. Mater. 7, 295–305 (1989).Google Scholar
6.Hutchinson, J. W. and Suo, Z., “Mixed Mode Cracking in Layered Materials”, to be published in Advances in Applied Mechanics, edited by Hutchinson, J. W. and Wu, T. Y. (Academic Press, San Diego, CA, 1991), Vol. 28.Google Scholar
7.Kinloch, A. J., Adhesion and Adhesives (Chapman and Hall, London, 1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8.Kinloch, A. J., J. Adhesion 10, 193–219 (1979).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9.Mostovoy, S. and Ripling, E. J., J. of Appl. Polym. Sci. 13, 1083–1111 (1969).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10.Bascom, W. D., J. Adhesion 2, 161–183 (1970).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11.Oh, T. S., Cannon, R. M., and Ritchie, R., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 70 (12), C352–C355 (1987).Google Scholar
12.Ritter, J. E., Conley, K., Steul, D., and Lardner, T. J., in Electronic Packaging Materials Science V, edited by Lillie, E. D., Ho, P. S., Jaccodine, R., and Jackson, K. (Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 203, Pittsburgh, PA, 1990), pp. 47–52.Google Scholar
13.Rockland, L.B., Analytical Chem. 32, 1375–1376 (1960).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14.Williams, J. G. and Marshall, G. P., Proc. R. Soc. London A 342, 55–77 (1975).Google Scholar
15.Thouless, M. D., Thin Solid Films 187, 397–406 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar