Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T10:00:35.687Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Study of the reaction mechanism between electroless Ni–P and Sn and its effect on the crystallization of Ni–P

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2011

Y. C. Sohn*
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology, 373–1 Kusong-dong, Yusong-gu, Taejon, Korea
Jin Yu
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology, 373–1 Kusong-dong, Yusong-gu, Taejon, Korea
S. K. Kang
Affiliation:
IBM T.J. Watson Research Center, P.O. Box 218/Route 134, Yorktown Heights, New York 10598
W. K. Choi
Affiliation:
IBM T.J. Watson Research Center, P.O. Box 218/Route 134, Yorktown Heights, New York 10598
D. Y. Shih
Affiliation:
IBM T.J. Watson Research Center, P.O. Box 218/Route 134, Yorktown Heights, New York 10598
*
Get access

Abstract

The reaction mechanism between electroless Ni–P and Sn was investigated to understand the effects of Sn on solder reaction-assisted crystallization at low temperatures as well as self-crystallization of Ni–P at high temperatures. Ni3Sn4 starts to form in a solid-state reaction well before Sn melts. Heat of reaction for Ni3Sn4 was measured during the Ni–P and Sn reaction (241.2 J/g). It was found that the solder reaction not only promotes crystallization at low temperatures by forming Ni3P in the P-rich layer but also facilitates self-crystallization of Ni–P by reducing the transformation temperature and heat of crystallization. The presence of Sn reduces the self-crystallization temperature of Ni–P by about 10 °C. The heat of crystallization also decreases with an increased Sn thickness.

Type
Rapid Communications
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2003

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1.Brenner, A. and Riddell, G., J. Res. Nat. Bur. Stand. 37, 1 (1946).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.Kreye, H., Müller, F., Lang, K., Isheim, D., Hentschel, T., Z. Metallkd. 86, 184 (1995).Google Scholar
3.Kreye, H., Müller, H-H., and Petzel, T., Galvanotechnik 77, 561 (1986).Google Scholar
4.Dietz, G. and Schneider, H.D., Phys, J., Condens. Matter 2, 2169 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5.Hur, K.H., Jeong, J.H., and Lee, D.N., J. Mater. Sci. 25, 2573 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6.Hentschel, Th., Isheim, D., Kirchheim, R., Müller, F., and Kreye, H., Acta Mater. 48, 933 (2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7.Wiegele, S., Thompson, P., Lee, R., and Ramsland, E., in Proceedings of IEEE Electronic Component and Technology Conference, (1998), p. 861.Google Scholar
8.Jang, J.W., Kim, P.G., Tu, K.N., Frear, D.R., and Thompson, P., J. Appl. Phys. 85, 8456 (1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9.Stepniak, F., Adv. Electron. Packaging 1, 353 (1997).Google Scholar
10.Hung, K.C., Chan, Y.C., Tang, C.W., and Ong, H.C., J. Mater. Res. 15, 2534 (2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11.Liu, P.L., Xu, Z., and Shang, J.K., Metall. Mater. Trans. A 31A, 2857 (2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12.Jang, J.W., Frear, D.R., Lee, T.Y., and Tu, K.N., J. Appl. Phys. 88, 6359 (2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13.Zeng, K. and Tu, K.N., Mater. Sci. Eng. R 38, 55 (2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14.Kang, S.K. and Ramachandran, V., Scipta Metall. 14, 421 (1980).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15.Lee, C.Y. and Lin, K.L., Thin Solid Films 249, 201 (1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16.Barin, I., Knacke, O., and Kubaschewski, O., Thermochemical Properties of Inorganic Substances (Springer, New York, 1977).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17.Park, S.H. and Lee, D.N., J. Mater. Sci. 23, 1643 (1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar