Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T22:21:42.088Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Structure and chemical characteristics of tin oxide films prepared by reactive-ion-assisted deposition as a function of oxygen ion beam energy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2011

Seok-Kyun Song ,
Daeil Kim ,
Steven Kim ,
Seok-Keun Koh ,
Hyung-Jin Jung ,
Jeong-Young Lee  and
Hong-Koo Baik
Seok-Kyun Song
Affiliation:
Plasmion Co., 50 Harrison Street, Hoboken, New Jersey 07030
Daeil Kim
Affiliation:
Plasmion Co., 50 Harrison Street, Hoboken, New Jersey 07030
Steven Kim
Affiliation:
Plasmion Co., 50 Harrison Street, Hoboken, New Jersey 07030
Seok-Keun Koh
Affiliation:
Thin Film Technology Research Center, Korea Institute of Science and Technology, P.O. Box 131, Cheongryang, Seoul 130–650 Korea
Hyung-Jin Jung
Affiliation:
Thin Film Technology Research Center, Korea Institute of Science and Technology, P.O. Box 131, Cheongryang, Seoul 130–650 Korea
Jeong-Young Lee
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology, Yousung Ku, Kusung Taejeon, Korea
Hong-Koo Baik
Affiliation:
Department of Metallurgical Engineering, Yonsei University, Seodamoon, Shinchon 134, Seoul 120–749, Korea
Get access

Abstract

Tin oxide films were deposited on amorphous SiO2/Si and Si (100) substrates by ion-assisted deposition (IAD) at various ion beam potentials (VI) at room temperature and a working pressure of 8 × 10−5 torr. The structural and chemical properties of the as-grown tin oxide films were investigated to determine the effects of the oxygen ion/atom arrival ratio (Ri). X-ray diffraction patterns indicated that the as-grown films with different average energy per atom (Eave) showed different growth directions. The as-grown films with oxygen/Sn ratio (NO/NSn) of 2.03 and 2.02 had preferred orientation of (101) and (002), respectively. In addition, the as-grown film with low Ri was amorphous. Comparison of the observed d spacings with those for standard SnO2 samples, indicated that the crystalline as-grown films had compressive and tensile stress depending on Eave. In transmission electron microscopy analysis, a buffer layer of amorphous tin oxide was observed at the interface between the substrate and the film, and the crystalline grains were grown on this buffer layer. The crystalline grains were arranged in large spherical clusters, and this shape directly affected surface roughness. Rutherford backscattering spectroscopy spectra showed that the tin oxide thin films were inhomogeneous. The density of films decreased and the porosity and oxygen trapped in the films increased with increasing Ri. The densest film had about 6% porosity.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Materials Research , Volume 15 , Issue 9 , September 2000 , pp. 1911 - 1921
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1.Semancik, S. and Fryberger, T.B., Sens. Actuators, B 1, 97 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.Dazhi, W., Shulin, W., Jun, C., Suyuan, Z., and Fangqing, L., Phys. Rev. B 49, 282 (1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.He, Y.S., Campbell, J.C., Murphy, R.C., Arendt, M.F., and Swinnea, J.S., J. Mater. Res. 8, 3131 (1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.Ghosh, A.K., Fishman, C., and Feng, T., J. Appl. Phys. 49, 3490 (1978).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5.Marifacier, J.S., Szepessy, L., Bresse, J.F., Perotin, M., and Stuck, R., Mater. Res. Bull. 14, 109 (1979).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6.Maudes, J.S. and Rodriguez, T., Thin Solid Films 69, 183 (1980).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7.Giani, E. and Kelly, R., J. Electrochem. Soc. 121, 394 (1974).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8.Bosnell, J.R. and Waghtone, R., Thin Solid Films 15, 141 (1973).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9.Susuki, T., Yamazaki, T., Yoshioka, H., and Hikichi, K., J. Mater. Sci. 23, 145 (1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10.Park, S.S. and Mackenzie, J.D., Thin Solid Films 258, 268 (1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11.Ghostagore, R.N., J. Electrochem. Soc. 125, 110 (1978).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12.Kim, K.H. and Park, T.S., J. Kor. Phys. Soc. 18, 124 (1985).Google Scholar
13.Manifacier, J.C., de Murcia, M., and Fillard, J.P., Thin Solid Films 41, 127 (1977).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14.Lane, D.W., Coath, J.A., and Beldon, H.S., Thin Solid Films 221, 262 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15.Koh, S.K., Song, S.K., Choi, W.K., and Jung, H-J., Rev. Sci. Instrum. 66, 5379 (1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16.Song, S.K., Choi, W.K., Baek, H.K., Jung, H-J., and Koh, S.K., J. Kor. Appl. Phys. 9, 246 (1996).Google Scholar
17.Cuomo, J.J., Rossnagel, S.M., and Kaufman, H.R., Handbook of Ion Beam Processing Technology (Noyes, Park Ridge, NJ, 1989), p. 194.Google Scholar
18.Jarzebski, Z.M., J. Electrochem. Soc. 123, 199 (1976).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19.Shanthi, E., Dutta, V., Baneriee, A., and Chopra, K.L., J. Appl. Phys. 51(12), 6243 (1981).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
20.Advani, G.N., Jordan, A.G., and Weiss, P.K., Mater. Sci. Eng. 4 (1979).Google Scholar
21.Coutts, T.J., Liand, X., and Cessert, T.A., IEEE Electron. Lett. 26, 660 (1990).Google Scholar
22.Melsheimer, J. and Ziegler, D., Thin Solid Films 129, 35 (1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
23.Melsheimer, J. and Ziegler, D., Thin Solid Films 110, 71 (1983).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
24.Zemel, J., Thin Solid Films 163, 189 (1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
25.Choi, W.K., Jung, H.J., and Koh, S.K., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. 14, 359 (1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
26.Song, S-K., Choi, W.K., Cho, J-S., Jung, H-J., Choi, D., Lee, J-Y., Baik, H-K., and Koh, S-K., Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 36, 2281 (1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
27.Kaufman, H.R., Operation of Broad-Beam Source (Commonwealth Scientific, Alexandria, VA, 1987), p. 133.Google Scholar
28.Arzimovich, L.A., Elementary Plasma Physics (Blaisdell, MA, 1965), p. 90.Google Scholar
29.Cullity, B.D., Elements of X-Ray Diffraction, 2nd ed. (Addison-Wesley, Torranu, CA, 1978), p. 284.Google Scholar
30.Edington, J.W., 3 Interpretation of Transmission Electron Micrographs (Philips, Eindhoven, The Netherlands, 1975), p. 80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
31.Cuomo, J.J., Rossnagel, S.M., and Kaufman, H.R., Handbook of Ion Beam Processing Technology (Noyes, Park Ridge, NJ, 1989), p. 262.Google Scholar
32.Grosse, P., Schmitte, F.J., Frank, G., and Kostlin, H., Thin Solid Films 90, 309 (1982).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
33.Krikorian, E. and Sneed, R.J., Astrophys. Space Sci. 65, 129 (1979).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
34.Ansell, R.O., Dickinson, T., Povey, A.F., and Sherwood, P.M.A, J. Electrochem. Soc. 124, 1360 (1977).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
35.Rossnagel, S.M., Cuomo, J.J., and Westwood, W.D., Handbook of Plasma Processing Technology (Noyes, Park Ridge, NJ, 1990), p. 91.Google Scholar
36.Nowotny, J. and Dufour, L-C., Surface and Near-Surface Chemistry of Oxide Materials (Elsevier, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1988), p. 137.Google Scholar
37.Lin, A.W.C, Armstrong, N.R., and Kuwana, T., Anal. Chem. 49, 1228 (1977).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
38.Cuomo, J.J., Rossnagel, S.M., and Kaufman, H.R., Handbook of Ion Beam Processing Technology (Noyes, Park Riege, NJ, 1989), p. 265.Google Scholar