Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-ckgrl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-22T22:48:36.135Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Sintering characteristics of Y–Ba–Cu oxide–Agx superconductors under argon atmosphere

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2011

L. C. Pathak
Affiliation:
National Metallurgical Laboratory, Jamshedpur—831 007, India
S. K. Mishra (Pathak)
Affiliation:
National Metallurgical Laboratory, Jamshedpur—831 007, India
S. Srikanth
Affiliation:
NML Centre, CSIR Madras Complex, Taramani, Chennai—600 113, India
Get access

Abstract

Sintering studies on Y–Ba–Cu oxide (YBCO)–Agx (x = 0, 0.6, and 1.0 mol) powder were carried out in argon atmosphere to understand the role of silver addition on the densification behavior of these materials. The increase of sintered densities of the compacts with silver addition in argon atmosphere contradicted our earlier observation on sintering of YBCO–Agx powder compacts in air, where the densities decreased for x > 0.6. Thermogravimetric (TG) studies under argon atmosphere indicate a continuous decrease of mass on heating suggesting an enhanced rate of oxygen removal from the YBCO matrix that facilitated the sintering in argon atmosphere. Sintering studies of YBCO–Agx powder compacts in argon in conjunction with earlier observations in air has substantiated our claim that high-temperature oxygen desorption by the silver from the YBCO matrix to the sintering atmosphere controls the rate of densification for these superconducting composites. However, the apparent activation energies for sintering suggest that the sintering process is controlled by yttrium ion diffusion along bulk and grain boundaries.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1Singh, J.P., Leu, H.J., Poeppel, R.B., Vanvoorhees, E., Goudey, G.T., Winsley, K., and Shi, D., J. Appl. Phys. 66, 3154 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2Ganapathy, L., Kumar, A., and Narayan, J., J. Appl. Phys. Lett. 66, 766 (1989).Google Scholar
3Gangopadhyay, A.K. and Mason, T.O., Physica C 178, 64 (1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4Pathak, L.C., Mishra, S.K., Bhattacharya, D., and Chopra, K.L., J. Mater. Res. 14, 4148 (1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5Bhattacharya, D., Pathak, L.C., Mishra, S.K., Sen, D., and Chopra, K.L., Appl. Phys. Lett. 57, 2145 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6Nakamura, Y., Tachibana, K., Kato, S., Ban, T., Yoo, S.I., and Fujimoto, H., Physica C 294, 302 (1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7MacManus-Driscoll, J.L., Bravman, J.C., and Beyers, R.B, Physica C 241, 401 (1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8German, R.M., Am. Ceram. Soc. Bull. 61, 272 (1978).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9Coble, R.L., J. Appl. Phys. 32, 787 (1961).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10Cho, S.H., Kim, D.Y., and Khim, Z.G., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 72,1516 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11Borphy, J.H., Rose, R.M., and Wulff, J., “Structure and Properties of Materials,” Vol. II, Thermodynamic Properties (Wiley Easter Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi, India, 1971).Google Scholar
12Rothman, S.J., Routbort, J.L., and Baker, J.E., Phys. Rev. B 40,8852 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13Routbort, J.L., Rothman, S.J., Chen, N., and Baker, J.E., Phys. Rev. B 43, 5489 (1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14Chen, N., Rothman, S.J., Routbort, J.L., and Goreta, K.C., J. Mater. Res. 7, 2308 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15Melendo, M.J., Lopez, A.R.D.A., Rodriguez, A.D., Goretta, K.C., and Routbort, J.L., Acta Metall. Mater. 43, 2429 (1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16Pathak, L.C., Mishra, S.K., Mukunda, P.G., Godkhindi, M.M., Bhattacharya, D., and Chopra, K.L., J. Mater. Sci. 29, 5455 (1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar