Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T07:44:43.307Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Reciprocating wear mechanisms in a Zr-based bulk metallic glass

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 March 2011

H.W. Jin ,
R. Ayer ,
J.Y. Koo ,
R. Raghavan  and
U. Ramamurty
H.W. Jin
Affiliation:
Advanced Structural Materials Section, ExxonMobil Research & Engineering Company, Annandale, New Jersey 08801
R. Ayer
Affiliation:
Advanced Structural Materials Section, ExxonMobil Research & Engineering Company, Annandale, New Jersey 08801
J.Y. Koo
Affiliation:
Advanced Structural Materials Section, ExxonMobil Research & Engineering Company, Annandale, New Jersey 08801
R. Raghavan
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Engineering, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore-560012, India
U. Ramamurty*
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Engineering, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore-560012, India
*
a) Address all correspondence to this author. e-mail: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

The dry sliding friction coefficient μ and the wear volume loss W, in a zirconium-based bulk metallic glass (BMG) under high-frequency (50 Hz) reciprocating conditions, were investigated with the objective of assessing the influence of free volume and crystallization on the wear behavior of amorphous metals. The BMG samples were annealed either below the glass transition temperature Tg to induce structural relaxation and hence reduce the free volume that controls plasticity through shear-band formation or above Tg to crystallize the amorphous BMG prior to wear testing. Results show that the wear behavior of both the as-cast and relaxed glasses was dominated by the oxidation of the surface layers. A sharp transition in the contact electrical resistance complemented by a marked increase in μ was noted. This was attributed to the formation of a thick tribo film with high oxygen concentration and its subsequent delamination. The μ values, before as well as after the transition, in the relaxed glasses were similar to those for the as-cast alloy. However, a gradual decrease in W with annealing temperature was observed. A good correlation between W and nanohardness was noted, implying that the intrinsic hardness in the BMGs controlled the wear rate.

Keywords

AmorphousHardnessOxidation
Type
Reviews
Information
Journal of Materials Research , Volume 22 , Issue 2 , September 2006 , pp. 264 - 273
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1Klement, W., Willens, R.H., and Duwez, P.: Noncrystalline structure in solidified gold-silicon alloys. Nature 187, 869 (1960).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2Inoue, A.: Bulk amorphous and nanocrystalline alloys with high functional properties. Mater. Sci. Eng., A 304–306, 1 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3Schneider, S.: Bulk metallic glasses. J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 13, 7723 (2001).Google Scholar
4Wang, W.H., Dong, C., and Shek, C.H.: Bulk metallic glasses. Mater. Sci. Eng., R 44, 45 (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5Spaepen, F.: A microscopic mechanism for steady state in homogeneous flow in metallic glasses. Acta Metall. 25, 407 (1977).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6Anis, M., Rainforth, W.M., and Davies, H.A.: Wear behavior of rapidly solidified Fe68Cr18Mo2B12. Wear 172, 135 (1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7Gloriant, T.: Microhardness and abrasive wear resistance of metallic glasses and nanostructured composite materials. J. Non-Cryst. Solids 316, 96 (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8Li, G., Wang, Y.Q., Wang, L.M., Gao, Y.P., Zhang, R.J., Zhan, Z.J., Sun, L.L., Zhang, J., and Wang, W.K.: Wear behavior of bulk Zr41Ti14Cu12.5Ni10Be22.5 metallic glass. J. Mater. Res. 17, 1877 (2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9Blau, P.J.: Friction and wear of a Zr-based amorphous alloy under dry and lubricated conditions. Wear 250, 431 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10Fu, X., Kasai, T., Falk, M.L., and Rigney, D.A.: Sliding behavior of metallic glass: Part I. Experimental investigations. Wear 250, 409 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11Murali, P. and Ramamurty, U.: Embrittlement of a bulk metallic glass due to sub-Tg annealing. Acta Mater. 53, 1467 (2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12Ramamurty, U., Lee, I.M.L., Basu, J., and Li, Y.: Embrittlement of a bulk metallic glass due to low temperature annealing. Scripta Mater. 47, 107 (2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13Nagendra, N., Ramamurty, U., Goh, T.T., and Li, Y.: Effect of crystallinity on the impact toughness of a La-based bulk metallic glass. Acta Mater. 48, 2603 (2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14Basu, J., Nagendra, N., Li, Y., and Ramamurty, U.: Microstructure and mechanical properties of partially-crystallized la-based bulk metallic glass. Philos. Mag. 83, 1747 (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15Oliver, W.C. and Pharr, G.M.: An improved technique for determining hardness and elastic modulus using load and displacement sensing indentation experiments. J. Mater. Res. 7, 1564 (1992).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16Schuh, C.A., Neih, T.G., and Kawamura, Y.: Rate dependence of serrated flow during nanoindentation of a bulk metallic glass. J. Mater. Res. 17, 1651 (2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17Schuh, C.A., Lund, A.C., and Nieh, T.G.: New regime of homogeneous flow in the deformation map of metallic glasses: Elevated temperature nanoindentation experiments and mechanistic modeling. Acta Mater. 52, 5879 (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18Greer, A.L., Castellero, A., Madge, S.V., Walker, I.T., and Wilde, J.R.: Nanoindentation studies of shear banding in fully amorphous and partially devitrified metallic alloys. Mater. Sci. Eng., A 375–377, 1182 (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19Van Den Beukel, A. and Sietsma, J.: The glass transition as a free volume related kinetic phenomenon. Acta Metall. Mater. 38, 383 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
20Slipenyuk, A. and Eckert, J.: Correlation between enthalpy change and free volume reduction during structural relaxation of Zr55Cu30Al10Ni5 metallic glass. Scripta Mater. 50, 39 (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
21Patnaik, M.N.M., Narasimhan, R., and Ramamurty, U.: Spherical indentation response of metallic glasses. Acta Mater. 52, 3335 (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
22Ramamurty, U., Jana, S., Kawamura, Y., and Chattopadhyay, K.: Hardness and plastic deformation in a bulk metallic glass. Acta Mater. 53, 705 (2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
23Bhowmick, R., Raghavan, R., Chattopadhyay, K., and Ramamurty, U.: Plastic flow softening in a bulk metallic glass. Acta Mater. 54, 4221 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
24Fu, X., Falk, M.L., and Rigney, D.A.: Sliding behavior of metallic glass: Part II. Computer simulations. Wear 250, 420 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
25Schuh, C.A. and Neih, T.G.: A survey of instrumented indentation studies on metallic glasses. J. Mater. Res. 19, 46 (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
26Sharmal, S.K., Strunskus, T., Ladebusch, H., and Faupel, F.: Surface oxidation of amorphous Zr65Cu17.5Ni10Al7.5 and Zr46.75Ti8.25Cu7.5Ni10Be27.5. Mater. Sci. Eng., A 304–306, 747 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
27Wu, Y., Nagase, T., and Umakoshi, Y.: Effect of crystallization behavior on the oxidation resistance of a Zr–Al–Cu metallic glass below the crystallization temperature. J. Non-Cryst. Solids 352, 3015 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
28Paljevia, M.: High-temperature oxidation behaviour in the Zr-Al system. J. Alloys Compd. 204, 119 (1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
29Kai, W., Hsieh, H.H., Nieh, T.G., and Kawamura, Y.: Oxidation behavior of a Zr–Cu–Al–Ni amorphous alloy in air at 300–425 °C. Intermetallics 10, 1260 (2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar