Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T11:50:50.905Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Rate Dependence of Serrated Flow During Nanoindentation of a Bulk Metallic Glass

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2011

C. A. Schuh
Affiliation:
Materials Science and Technology Division, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, California 94550
T. G. Nieh
Affiliation:
Materials Science and Technology Division, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, California 94550
Y. Kawamura
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering and Materials Science, Faculty of Engineering, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, 860, Japan
Get access

Abstract

Plastic deformation of Pd–40Ni–20P bulk metallic glass (BMG) was investigated by instrumented nanoindentation experiments over a broad range of indentation strain rates. At low rates, the load–displacement curves during indentation exhibited numerous serrations or pop-ins, but these serrations became less prominent as the indentation rate was increased. Using the tip velocity during pop-in as a gauge of serration activity, we found that serrated flow is only significant at indentation strain rates below about 1–10/s. This result suggests a transition in plastic flow behavior at high strain rates, in agreement with prior studies of BMGs under different modes of loading.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Mukai, T., Nieh, T.G., Kawamura, Y., Inoue, A., and Higashi, K., Scr. Mater. 46, 43 (2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wright, W.J., Saha, R., and Nix, W.D., Mater. Trans. Jpn. Inst. Mater. 42, 642 (2001).Google Scholar
Wright, W.J., Schwarz, R.B., and Nix, W.D., Mater. Sci. Eng. A 319–321, 229 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kimura, H. and Masumoto, T., Acta Metall. 31, 231 (1983).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pampillo, C.A. and Chen, H.S., Mater. Sci. Eng. 13, 181 (1974).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donovan, P.E., Acta Metall. 37, 445 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Szuecs, F., Kim, C.P., and Johnson, W.L., Acta Mater. 49, 1507 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hays, C.C., Kim, C.P., and Johnson, W.L., Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 2901 (2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pekarskaya, E., Kim, C.P., and Johnson, W.L., J. Mater. Res. 16, 2513 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kimura, H. and Masumoto, T., Acta Metall. 28, 1663 (1980).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kimura, H. and Masumoto, T., Acta Metall. 28, 1677 (1980).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kimura, H. and Masumoto, T., Philos. Mag. 44A, 1005 (1981).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kimura, H. and Masumoto, T., Philos. Mag. 44A, 1021 (1981).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Golovin, Y.I., Ivolgin, V.I., Khonik, V.A., Kitagawa, K., and Tyurin, A.I., Scr. Mater. 45, 947 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vaidyanathan, R., Dao, M., Ravichandran, G., and Suresh, S., Acta Mater. 49, 3781 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kato, H., Kawamura, Y., Inoue, A., and Chen, H-S., Mater. Sci. Eng. A 304–306, 758 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Suresh, S., Nieh, T-G., and Choi, B.W., Scr. Mater. 41, 951 (1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pang, M. and Bahr, D.F., J. Mater. Res. 16, 2634 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corcoran, S.G., Colton, R.J., Lilleodden, E.T., and Gerberich, W.W., Phys. Rev. B55, R16057 (1997).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gouldstone, A., Van-Vliet, K.J., and Suresh, S., Nature 411, 656 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bahr, D.F., Kramer, D.E., and Gerberich, W.W., Acta Mater. 46, 3605 (1998).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poisl, W.H., Oliver, W.C., and Fabes, B.D., J. Mater. Res. 8, 2024 (1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tymiak, N.I., Kramer, D.E., Bahr, D.F., Wyrobek, T.J., and Gerberich, W.W., Acta Mater. 49, 1021 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar