Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T22:45:04.305Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Quantitative comparison between the degree of domain orientation and nonlinear properties of a PZT ceramic during electrical and mechanical loading

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 April 2011

Mie Marsilius ,
Torsten Granzow  and
Jacob L. Jones
Mie Marsilius*
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science, Technische Universität Darmstadt, 64287 Darmstadt, Germany
Torsten Granzow
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science, Technische Universität Darmstadt, 64287 Darmstadt, Germany
Jacob L. Jones
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida 32611-6400
*
a)Address all correspondence to this author. e-mail: [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

The macroscopic electromechanical coupling properties of ferroelectric polycrystals are composed of linear and nonlinear contributions. The nonlinear contribution is typically associated with the extrinsic effects related to the creation and motion of domain walls. To quantitatively compare the macroscopic nonlinear properties of a lead zirconate titanate ceramic and the degree of domain orientation, in-situ neutron and high-energy x-ray diffraction experiments are performed and they provide the domain orientation density as a function of the external electric field and mechanical compression. Furthermore, the macroscopic strain under the application of external electrical and mechanical loads is measured and the nonlinear strain is calculated by means of the linear intrinsic piezoelectric effect and the linear intrinsic elasticity. The domain orientation density and the nonlinear strain show the same dependence on the external load. The scaling factor that relates to the two values is constant and is the same for both electrical and mechanical loadings.

Keywords

Neutron scatteringX-ray diffraction (XRD)Ferroelectricity
Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Materials Research , Volume 26 , Issue 9 , 14 May 2011 , pp. 1126 - 1132
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1.Jaffe, B., Cook, W.R., and Jaffe, H.: Piezoelectric Ceramics (Techbooks, Falls Church, VA, 1989).Google Scholar
2.Merz, W.J.: Domain formation and domain-wall motions in ferroelectric BaTiO3 single crystals. Phys. Rev. 95(3), 690 (1954).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.Lewis, B.: Energy loss processes in ferroelectric ceramics. Proc. Phys. Soc. London 73(469), 17 (1959).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.Berlincourt, D. and Krüger, H.H.: Domain processes in lead titanate zirconate and barium titanate ceramics. J. Appl. Phys. 30(11), 1804 (1959).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5.Schäufele, A.B. and Härdtl, K.H.: Ferroelastic properties of lead zirconate titanate ceramics. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 79(10), 2637 (1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6.Li, J.Y., Rogan, R.C., Üstündag, E., and Bhattacharya, K.: Domain switching in polycrystalline ferroelectric ceramics. Nat. Mater. 4(10), 776 (2005).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7.Hoffmann, M.J., Hammer, M., Endriss, A., and Lupascu, D.C.: Correlation between microstructure, strain behavior, and acoustic emission of soft PZT ceramics. Acta Mater. 49(7), 1301 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8.Randall, C.A., Barber, D.J., and Whatmore, R.W.: Ferroelectric domain configurations in a modified-PZT ceramic. J. Mater. Sci. 22(3), 925 (1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9.Li, S.P., Bhalla, A.S., Newnham, R.E., Cross, L.E., and Huang, C.Y.: 90-degrees domain reversal in Pb(ZrXTi1-X)O3 ceramics. J. Mater. Sci. 29(5), 1290 (1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10.Rogan, R.C., Üstündag, E., Clausen, B., and Daymond, M.R.: Texture and strain analysis of the ferroelastic behavior of Pb(Zr, Ti)O3 by in situ neutron diffraction. J. Appl. Phys. 93(7), 4104 (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11.Jones, J.L., Hoffman, M., and Vogel, S.C.: Orientation-dependent lattice strains in lead zirconate titanate under mechanical compression by in situ neutron diffraction. Physica B 385, 548 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12.Jones, J.L., Hoffman, M., and Vogel, S.C.: Ferroelastic domain switching in lead zirconate titanate measured by in situ neutron diffraction. Mech. Mater. 39(4), 283 (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13.Jones, J.L., Pramanick, A., Nino, J.C., Motahari, S.M., Üstündag, E., Daymond, M.R., and Oliver, E.C.: Time-resolved and orientation-dependent electric-field-induced strains in lead zirconate titanate ceramics. Appl. Phys. Lett. 90(17), 172909 (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14.Pramanick, A., Prewitt, A.D., Cottrell, M.A., Lee, W., Studer, A.J., An, K., Hubbard, C.R., and Jones, J.L.: In situ neutron diffraction studies of a commercial, soft lead zirconate titanate ceramic: Response to electric fields and mechanical stress. Appl. Phys. A Mater. Sci. Process. 99, 557 (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15.Webber, K.G., Aulbach, E., Key, T., Marsilius, M., Granzow, T., and Rödel, J.: Temperature-dependent ferroelastic switching of soft lead zirconate titanate. Acta Mater. 57(15), 4614 (2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16.Zhang, Y., Lupascu, D.C., Aulbach, E., Baturin, I., Bell, A., and Rödel, J.: Heterogeneity of fatigue in bulk lead zirconate titanate. Acta Mater. 53(8), 2203 (2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17.Fett, T., Munz, D., and Thun, G.: Young’s modulus of soft PZT from partial unloading tests. Ferroelectrics 274, 67 (2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18.Brule, A. and Kirstein, O.: Residual stress diffractometer KOWARI at the Australian research reactor OPAL: Status of the project. Physica B 385–386, 1040 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19.Jones, J.L., Iverson, B.J., and Bowman, K.J.: Texture and anisotropy of polycrystalline piezoelectrics. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 90(8), 2297 (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
20.Jones, J.L., Hoffman, M., and Bowman, K.J.: Saturated domain switching textures and strains in ferroelastic ceramics. J. Appl. Phys. 98(2), 24115 (2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
21.Jones, J.L., Slamovich, E.B., and Bowman, K.J.: Domain texture distributions in tetragonal lead zirconate titanate by x-ray and neutron diffraction. J. Appl. Phys. 97, 3 (2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
22.Hall, D.A., Steuwer, A., Cherdhirunkorn, B., Mori, T., and Withers, P.J.: A high energy synchrotron x-ray study of crystallographic texture and lattice strain in soft lead zirconate titanate ceramics. J. Appl. Phys. 96(8), 4245 (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
23.Hall, D.A., Steuwer, A., Cherdhirunkorn, B., Withers, P.J., and Mori, T.: Micromechanics of residual stress and texture development due to poling in polycrystalline ferroelectric ceramics. J. Mech. Phys. Solids 53(2), 249 (2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
24.Guo, R., Cross, L.E., Park, S.E., Noheda, B., Cox, D.E., and Shirane, G.: Origin of the high piezoelectric response in PbZr1-xTixO3. Phys. Rev. Lett. 84(23), 5423 (2000).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed